在Citarasa分析系统的人为因素评估验证中应用场景

H. Khalid
{"title":"在Citarasa分析系统的人为因素评估验证中应用场景","authors":"H. Khalid","doi":"10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports a human factors assessment validation (HFAV) study of the Citarasa analysis system involving the use of scenarios. The scenarios were use descriptions of the system, with embedded Citarasa descriptors, and involved a sequence of actions and events by actors. It is a web-based tool for elicitation and analysis of affective needs developed. Task oriented scenarios were created for two groups of actors: car designers and truck designers. Thirteen OEM vehicle designers validated the system. Each was given two scenarios to perform. To measure usability they completed a 40-item questionnaire. The factor analysis confirmed several important aspects of usability: usefulness, aesthetics satisfaction, perceived control, and task appropriateness. Content validity of items was confirmed with Pearson correlation coefficients. The planners preferred utility of the tool over aesthetics. The scenarios facilitated effective user interaction through enactment of the scenarios during use.","PeriodicalId":111259,"journal":{"name":"2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES)","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making use of scenarios in human factors assessment validation of Citarasa analysis system\",\"authors\":\"H. Khalid\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports a human factors assessment validation (HFAV) study of the Citarasa analysis system involving the use of scenarios. The scenarios were use descriptions of the system, with embedded Citarasa descriptors, and involved a sequence of actions and events by actors. It is a web-based tool for elicitation and analysis of affective needs developed. Task oriented scenarios were created for two groups of actors: car designers and truck designers. Thirteen OEM vehicle designers validated the system. Each was given two scenarios to perform. To measure usability they completed a 40-item questionnaire. The factor analysis confirmed several important aspects of usability: usefulness, aesthetics satisfaction, perceived control, and task appropriateness. Content validity of items was confirmed with Pearson correlation coefficients. The planners preferred utility of the tool over aesthetics. The scenarios facilitated effective user interaction through enactment of the scenarios during use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES)\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文报道了一项涉及场景使用的Citarasa分析系统的人为因素评估验证(HFAV)研究。场景是使用系统的描述,带有嵌入式Citarasa描述符,并涉及参与者的一系列动作和事件。它是一个基于网络的工具,用于开发情感需求的启发和分析。面向任务的场景是为两组参与者创建的:汽车设计师和卡车设计师。13个OEM车辆设计师验证了该系统。每个人都有两个场景要执行。为了测量可用性,他们完成了一份包含40个项目的问卷。因子分析确定了可用性的几个重要方面:有用性、美学满意度、感知控制和任务适当性。采用Pearson相关系数验证项目的内容效度。规划者更喜欢工具的实用性而不是美观性。通过在使用过程中制定场景,这些场景促进了有效的用户交互。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making use of scenarios in human factors assessment validation of Citarasa analysis system
This paper reports a human factors assessment validation (HFAV) study of the Citarasa analysis system involving the use of scenarios. The scenarios were use descriptions of the system, with embedded Citarasa descriptors, and involved a sequence of actions and events by actors. It is a web-based tool for elicitation and analysis of affective needs developed. Task oriented scenarios were created for two groups of actors: car designers and truck designers. Thirteen OEM vehicle designers validated the system. Each was given two scenarios to perform. To measure usability they completed a 40-item questionnaire. The factor analysis confirmed several important aspects of usability: usefulness, aesthetics satisfaction, perceived control, and task appropriateness. Content validity of items was confirmed with Pearson correlation coefficients. The planners preferred utility of the tool over aesthetics. The scenarios facilitated effective user interaction through enactment of the scenarios during use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity of heart rate variability as indicator of driver sleepiness Design of lobster fishing equipment and its contribution to fishery industrial cluster performance: Case study: East Java, Indonesia A simple, general and robust trust agent to help elderly select online services Occupant movement tracking in high-rise building evacuation planning using RFID technology and SMS gateway Effects of guided arrows on head-up display towards the vehicle windshield
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1