{"title":"日本公司治理的逐步转型","authors":"L. Nottage, L. Wolff, K. Anderson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1121510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan has recovered from a ‘lost decade’ of economic stagnation over the 1990s. Anyway, it \nhas been a ‘found decade’ for civil and criminal justice law reform, especially in corporate and \nsecurities law. Yet, have liberalisation and globalisation in those fields led to major changes in the ‘law \nin action’? Does this represent ‘Americanisation’ of Japan’s corporate governance system, focusing on \nshareholders rather than other key stakeholders such as ‘main banks’, core employees, and partners \nwithin diffuse corporate groups (keiretsu)? This version of our introductory chapter explains how our \nforthcoming book argues for a more complex ‘gradual transformation’. Such shifts are also found in \nmany other post-industrial economies, but Japan appears to give greater emphasis given to certain \nmodes of achieving change. The book brings together contributions from academics and practitioners \nfrom Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. An early chapter introduces \nmethodology for effective cross-country comparisons and for evaluating the burgeoning but divergent \nliterature on Japanese corporate governance. The concluding chapter compares continuities and \nchanges in Japan’s largest companies now and two decades ago. Other chapters cover ‘lifelong \nemployment’, main banks, the untold story of closely-held companies, the limited uptake of the \nCommittee-based governance form, and the procedural, substantive and FDI policy dimensions of \ntakeovers law and practice.","PeriodicalId":423843,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Japan's Gradual Transformation in Corporate Governance\",\"authors\":\"L. Nottage, L. Wolff, K. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1121510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Japan has recovered from a ‘lost decade’ of economic stagnation over the 1990s. Anyway, it \\nhas been a ‘found decade’ for civil and criminal justice law reform, especially in corporate and \\nsecurities law. Yet, have liberalisation and globalisation in those fields led to major changes in the ‘law \\nin action’? Does this represent ‘Americanisation’ of Japan’s corporate governance system, focusing on \\nshareholders rather than other key stakeholders such as ‘main banks’, core employees, and partners \\nwithin diffuse corporate groups (keiretsu)? This version of our introductory chapter explains how our \\nforthcoming book argues for a more complex ‘gradual transformation’. Such shifts are also found in \\nmany other post-industrial economies, but Japan appears to give greater emphasis given to certain \\nmodes of achieving change. The book brings together contributions from academics and practitioners \\nfrom Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. An early chapter introduces \\nmethodology for effective cross-country comparisons and for evaluating the burgeoning but divergent \\nliterature on Japanese corporate governance. The concluding chapter compares continuities and \\nchanges in Japan’s largest companies now and two decades ago. Other chapters cover ‘lifelong \\nemployment’, main banks, the untold story of closely-held companies, the limited uptake of the \\nCommittee-based governance form, and the procedural, substantive and FDI policy dimensions of \\ntakeovers law and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1121510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1121510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Japan's Gradual Transformation in Corporate Governance
Japan has recovered from a ‘lost decade’ of economic stagnation over the 1990s. Anyway, it
has been a ‘found decade’ for civil and criminal justice law reform, especially in corporate and
securities law. Yet, have liberalisation and globalisation in those fields led to major changes in the ‘law
in action’? Does this represent ‘Americanisation’ of Japan’s corporate governance system, focusing on
shareholders rather than other key stakeholders such as ‘main banks’, core employees, and partners
within diffuse corporate groups (keiretsu)? This version of our introductory chapter explains how our
forthcoming book argues for a more complex ‘gradual transformation’. Such shifts are also found in
many other post-industrial economies, but Japan appears to give greater emphasis given to certain
modes of achieving change. The book brings together contributions from academics and practitioners
from Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. An early chapter introduces
methodology for effective cross-country comparisons and for evaluating the burgeoning but divergent
literature on Japanese corporate governance. The concluding chapter compares continuities and
changes in Japan’s largest companies now and two decades ago. Other chapters cover ‘lifelong
employment’, main banks, the untold story of closely-held companies, the limited uptake of the
Committee-based governance form, and the procedural, substantive and FDI policy dimensions of
takeovers law and practice.