工业系统中硬件在环测试中持续集成故障的普遍性

H. Fu, Sigrid Eldh, Kristian Wiklund, Andreas Ermedahl, Cyrille Artho
{"title":"工业系统中硬件在环测试中持续集成故障的普遍性","authors":"H. Fu, Sigrid Eldh, Kristian Wiklund, Andreas Ermedahl, Cyrille Artho","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faults in the automated continuous integration (CI) process can seriously impact the development of industrial code. To reduce manual intervention in automated CI processes, we want to understand better the CI systems' failure distribution to improve efficiency, reliability, and maintainability. This paper investigates failures in CI in four large industrial projects. We gather 11 731 builds over six months, identifying 1 414 failing builds. We also identify the distribution of different types of build failures in each of the four CI projects. Our results show that compilation is the most significant individual cause of failure with 47 %, followed by testing at 36 %. The checkout step with associated checks also incurs a non-negligible portion of failures with 12 %. Furthermore, we identify 14 distinct types of failures in the testing step. We conclude that configuration problems are a significant issue, as pipeline scripting and dependency errors make up a large number of failures.","PeriodicalId":178302,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of continuous integration failures in industrial systems with hardware-in-the-loop testing\",\"authors\":\"H. Fu, Sigrid Eldh, Kristian Wiklund, Andreas Ermedahl, Cyrille Artho\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Faults in the automated continuous integration (CI) process can seriously impact the development of industrial code. To reduce manual intervention in automated CI processes, we want to understand better the CI systems' failure distribution to improve efficiency, reliability, and maintainability. This paper investigates failures in CI in four large industrial projects. We gather 11 731 builds over six months, identifying 1 414 failing builds. We also identify the distribution of different types of build failures in each of the four CI projects. Our results show that compilation is the most significant individual cause of failure with 47 %, followed by testing at 36 %. The checkout step with associated checks also incurs a non-negligible portion of failures with 12 %. Furthermore, we identify 14 distinct types of failures in the testing step. We conclude that configuration problems are a significant issue, as pipeline scripting and dependency errors make up a large number of failures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动化持续集成(CI)过程中的错误会严重影响工业代码的开发。为了减少自动化CI过程中的人工干预,我们希望更好地理解CI系统的故障分布,以提高效率、可靠性和可维护性。本文调查了四个大型工业项目中持续集成的失败。我们在六个月内收集了11 731个构建,确定了1 414个失败的构建。我们还确定了四个CI项目中不同类型的构建失败的分布。我们的结果显示,编译是导致失败的最重要的单个原因,占47%,其次是测试,占36%。带有相关检查的签出步骤也会导致不可忽略的12%的失败。此外,我们在测试步骤中确定了14种不同类型的故障。我们得出结论,配置问题是一个重要的问题,因为管道脚本和依赖错误构成了大量的失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of continuous integration failures in industrial systems with hardware-in-the-loop testing
Faults in the automated continuous integration (CI) process can seriously impact the development of industrial code. To reduce manual intervention in automated CI processes, we want to understand better the CI systems' failure distribution to improve efficiency, reliability, and maintainability. This paper investigates failures in CI in four large industrial projects. We gather 11 731 builds over six months, identifying 1 414 failing builds. We also identify the distribution of different types of build failures in each of the four CI projects. Our results show that compilation is the most significant individual cause of failure with 47 %, followed by testing at 36 %. The checkout step with associated checks also incurs a non-negligible portion of failures with 12 %. Furthermore, we identify 14 distinct types of failures in the testing step. We conclude that configuration problems are a significant issue, as pipeline scripting and dependency errors make up a large number of failures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Complexity Metrics with Hotspot Analysis to Support Software Sustainability Evaluating Human Locomotion Safety in Mobile Robots Populated Environments Performance Bottleneck Analysis of Drone Computation Offloading to a Shared Fog Node Early Software Defect Prediction: Right-Shifting Software Effort Data into a Defect Curve A Survey on Autonomous Driving System Simulators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1