基于机器学习方法的乳腺癌准确检测与分类

D. Sandeep, G. Bethel
{"title":"基于机器学习方法的乳腺癌准确检测与分类","authors":"D. Sandeep, G. Bethel","doi":"10.1109/I-SMAC52330.2021.9640710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper there is comparison of four different machine learning algorithms such as Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Fuzzy logic and Genetic algorithm on Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnosis (WBCD) dataset for the detection of breast cancer in women. The test accuracies are compared to show the efficient algorithm for the detection of breast cancer using those algorithms. The dataset is partitioned to 70% training data and 30% testing data. The results for the applied algorithms are CNN acquired 96.49% accuracy, RNN acquired 63.15% accuracy, fuzzy logic acquired 88.81% accuracy, and genetic algorithm acquired 80.399% accuracy.","PeriodicalId":178783,"journal":{"name":"2021 Fifth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC)","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate Breast Cancer Detection and Classification by Machine Learning Approach\",\"authors\":\"D. Sandeep, G. Bethel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/I-SMAC52330.2021.9640710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper there is comparison of four different machine learning algorithms such as Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Fuzzy logic and Genetic algorithm on Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnosis (WBCD) dataset for the detection of breast cancer in women. The test accuracies are compared to show the efficient algorithm for the detection of breast cancer using those algorithms. The dataset is partitioned to 70% training data and 30% testing data. The results for the applied algorithms are CNN acquired 96.49% accuracy, RNN acquired 63.15% accuracy, fuzzy logic acquired 88.81% accuracy, and genetic algorithm acquired 80.399% accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Fifth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC)\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Fifth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC52330.2021.9640710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Fifth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC52330.2021.9640710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了卷积神经网络(CNN)、递归神经网络(RNN)、模糊逻辑和遗传算法等四种不同的机器学习算法在威斯康星乳腺癌诊断(WBCD)数据集上对女性乳腺癌的检测。将测试的准确性进行比较,以显示使用这些算法检测乳腺癌的有效算法。数据集被划分为70%的训练数据和30%的测试数据。应用算法的结果是:CNN准确率为96.49%,RNN准确率为63.15%,模糊逻辑准确率为88.81%,遗传算法准确率为80.399%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accurate Breast Cancer Detection and Classification by Machine Learning Approach
In this paper there is comparison of four different machine learning algorithms such as Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Fuzzy logic and Genetic algorithm on Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnosis (WBCD) dataset for the detection of breast cancer in women. The test accuracies are compared to show the efficient algorithm for the detection of breast cancer using those algorithms. The dataset is partitioned to 70% training data and 30% testing data. The results for the applied algorithms are CNN acquired 96.49% accuracy, RNN acquired 63.15% accuracy, fuzzy logic acquired 88.81% accuracy, and genetic algorithm acquired 80.399% accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on the Modeling of Fast Face Recognition Against Age Disturbance under Deep Learning Design of IoT Network using Deep Learning-based Model for Anomaly Detection Analysis of the Impact of Blockchain and Net Technology on the Financial Governance of Internet Enterprises Affective Music Player for Multiple Emotion Recognition Using Facial Expressions with SVM A Deep Learning technology based covid-19 prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1