语言影响银行流动性创造吗?:全球跨国分析

J. Soula, Sara Yasar
{"title":"语言影响银行流动性创造吗?:全球跨国分析","authors":"J. Soula, Sara Yasar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3894270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Languages that grammatically mark the future influence the speakers’ intertemporal preferences, and thereby induce less future-oriented behavior. We predict that banks in countries with future tense marking reduce the perception of risk, and therefore they are more likely to engage in risky banking activities, leading to an increase in bank liquidity creation. We use data from 60 countries for testing such a linguistic hypothesis, and we find that banks in countries with future tense marking create higher liquidity than those in countries where speakers grammatically associate the future and the present. This is robust to using alternative measures of a country’s culture, alternative future tense reference, and several robustness checks. Our finding provides a new explanation for cross-country heterogeneity in bank output and contributes to the debate about the effect of language on economic behavior.","PeriodicalId":331807,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Language Affect Bank Liquidity Creation?: A Global Cross-Country Analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Soula, Sara Yasar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3894270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Languages that grammatically mark the future influence the speakers’ intertemporal preferences, and thereby induce less future-oriented behavior. We predict that banks in countries with future tense marking reduce the perception of risk, and therefore they are more likely to engage in risky banking activities, leading to an increase in bank liquidity creation. We use data from 60 countries for testing such a linguistic hypothesis, and we find that banks in countries with future tense marking create higher liquidity than those in countries where speakers grammatically associate the future and the present. This is robust to using alternative measures of a country’s culture, alternative future tense reference, and several robustness checks. Our finding provides a new explanation for cross-country heterogeneity in bank output and contributes to the debate about the effect of language on economic behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3894270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3894270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语法上标记未来的语言会影响说话者的跨时间偏好,从而导致较少的面向未来的行为。我们预测,在使用将来时态标记的国家,银行降低了对风险的感知,因此它们更有可能从事高风险的银行活动,从而导致银行流动性创造的增加。我们使用来自60个国家的数据来测试这样的语言学假设,我们发现,使用将来时标记的国家的银行比那些说话者在语法上将将来和现在联系起来的国家的银行创造了更高的流动性。这对于使用一个国家文化的替代度量、替代将来时参考和几个稳健性检查是稳健的。我们的发现为银行产出的跨国异质性提供了新的解释,并有助于讨论语言对经济行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Language Affect Bank Liquidity Creation?: A Global Cross-Country Analysis
Languages that grammatically mark the future influence the speakers’ intertemporal preferences, and thereby induce less future-oriented behavior. We predict that banks in countries with future tense marking reduce the perception of risk, and therefore they are more likely to engage in risky banking activities, leading to an increase in bank liquidity creation. We use data from 60 countries for testing such a linguistic hypothesis, and we find that banks in countries with future tense marking create higher liquidity than those in countries where speakers grammatically associate the future and the present. This is robust to using alternative measures of a country’s culture, alternative future tense reference, and several robustness checks. Our finding provides a new explanation for cross-country heterogeneity in bank output and contributes to the debate about the effect of language on economic behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wealth Management Products, Banking Competition, and Stability: Evidence from China Mirco-level Prediction of Outstanding Claim Counts using Neural Networks Lending Competition, Regulation and Non-Traditional Mortgages PE for the Public: The Rise of SPACs Lawmaking Without Law: How Overreliance on Economics Fails Financial Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1