a.c.a.c.i.a(反对控制引进金合欢的案例)19年后

P. Pieterse, C. Boucher
{"title":"a.c.a.c.i.a(反对控制引进金合欢的案例)19年后","authors":"P. Pieterse, C. Boucher","doi":"10.1080/10295925.1997.9631166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SYNOPSIS In 1977, Stubbings presented a paper titled “A.C.A.C.I.A. (A Case Against Controlling Introduced Acacias)” at the Second National Weeds Conference. The paper dealt with the merits of introducing biological control agents against introduced acacias, but concentrated mainly on Acacia mearnsii and the conflict of interest caused by the intended release of biological control agents against it. In the same year Luckhoff commented on the paper and challenged some of the statements made by Stubbings. In this paper the arguments of both Stubbings and Luckhoff are reviewed in the context of developments in this field since 1977. Points that are considered include classification of plants as weeds, luxurious water consumption by invaders, necessary actions to be executed before introducing biological control agents, effectiveness of seed-eating insects and integrated control including alternative control measures. Acacia mearnsii and A. saligna are used as case studies to illustrate some of the points made...","PeriodicalId":228456,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African Forestry Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A.C.A.C.I.A. (A Case Against Controlling Introduced Acacias)—19 years later\",\"authors\":\"P. Pieterse, C. Boucher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10295925.1997.9631166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SYNOPSIS In 1977, Stubbings presented a paper titled “A.C.A.C.I.A. (A Case Against Controlling Introduced Acacias)” at the Second National Weeds Conference. The paper dealt with the merits of introducing biological control agents against introduced acacias, but concentrated mainly on Acacia mearnsii and the conflict of interest caused by the intended release of biological control agents against it. In the same year Luckhoff commented on the paper and challenged some of the statements made by Stubbings. In this paper the arguments of both Stubbings and Luckhoff are reviewed in the context of developments in this field since 1977. Points that are considered include classification of plants as weeds, luxurious water consumption by invaders, necessary actions to be executed before introducing biological control agents, effectiveness of seed-eating insects and integrated control including alternative control measures. Acacia mearnsii and A. saligna are used as case studies to illustrate some of the points made...\",\"PeriodicalId\":228456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African Forestry Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African Forestry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10295925.1997.9631166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10295925.1997.9631166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

1977年,斯塔宾斯发表了一篇题为《a.c.a.c.i.a》的论文(反引进金合欢控制案例),在第二届全国杂草会议上。本文论述了引进生物防治剂防治外来金合欢的优点,但主要集中在金合欢及其生物防治剂预定释放所引起的利益冲突。同年,卢克霍夫评论了这篇论文,并对斯塔宾斯的一些言论提出了质疑。本文在1977年以来这一领域的发展背景下,回顾了斯塔宾斯和卢克霍夫的论点。考虑的要点包括植物分类为杂草、入侵者大量耗水、引入生物防治剂前必须采取的行动、食籽昆虫的有效性以及包括替代防治措施在内的综合防治。以金合欢(Acacia mearnsii)和沙林草(a.s aligna)为例,说明所提出的一些观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A.C.A.C.I.A. (A Case Against Controlling Introduced Acacias)—19 years later
SYNOPSIS In 1977, Stubbings presented a paper titled “A.C.A.C.I.A. (A Case Against Controlling Introduced Acacias)” at the Second National Weeds Conference. The paper dealt with the merits of introducing biological control agents against introduced acacias, but concentrated mainly on Acacia mearnsii and the conflict of interest caused by the intended release of biological control agents against it. In the same year Luckhoff commented on the paper and challenged some of the statements made by Stubbings. In this paper the arguments of both Stubbings and Luckhoff are reviewed in the context of developments in this field since 1977. Points that are considered include classification of plants as weeds, luxurious water consumption by invaders, necessary actions to be executed before introducing biological control agents, effectiveness of seed-eating insects and integrated control including alternative control measures. Acacia mearnsii and A. saligna are used as case studies to illustrate some of the points made...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comment to Editor Better utilisation of the skidder winch can decrease the overrun on the logging site Pinus patula establishment problem associated with poor ectomycorrhizal development in previously cultivated soils Prices of charcoal at various distances from Kampala and Dar es Salaam 1994–1999 A non-destructive sampling method for dendrochronology in hardwood species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1