光学BPSK和QPSK外差光波系统的比较

M. Boukli-Hacene, L. Kurz
{"title":"光学BPSK和QPSK外差光波系统的比较","authors":"M. Boukli-Hacene, L. Kurz","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.1994.474017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative study of the coherent optical binary phase shift keying (BPSK) and quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) heterodyne communication receivers is presented. First, both receivers are analyzed assuming two systems with a 0.5 dB and 2.5 dB power penalty. The analysis is performed in terms of laser linewidth, bit rate signal power and phase error for the same bit error rate 10/sup -10/. The sensitivities of the two types of receivers are compared. Second, calculations of the signal to noise ratio (SNR) optimum, probability of bit error with cycle slippage and non-cycle slippage for both systems are presented. Finally, the comparison in terms of BER versus number of photons/bit (E/sub pb/) for different laser linewidth/bit rates and bit error rate 10/sup -3/ and 10/sup -1/ are presented. It is shown that the QPSK receiver requires a larger amount of power than the BPSK receiver to achieve the same performance. At the power penalty of 0.5 dB, the QPSK systems are impractical while the BPSK system performs well.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":337873,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of MILCOM '94","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of optical BPSK and QPSK heterodyne lightwave systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Boukli-Hacene, L. Kurz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MILCOM.1994.474017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative study of the coherent optical binary phase shift keying (BPSK) and quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) heterodyne communication receivers is presented. First, both receivers are analyzed assuming two systems with a 0.5 dB and 2.5 dB power penalty. The analysis is performed in terms of laser linewidth, bit rate signal power and phase error for the same bit error rate 10/sup -10/. The sensitivities of the two types of receivers are compared. Second, calculations of the signal to noise ratio (SNR) optimum, probability of bit error with cycle slippage and non-cycle slippage for both systems are presented. Finally, the comparison in terms of BER versus number of photons/bit (E/sub pb/) for different laser linewidth/bit rates and bit error rate 10/sup -3/ and 10/sup -1/ are presented. It is shown that the QPSK receiver requires a larger amount of power than the BPSK receiver to achieve the same performance. At the power penalty of 0.5 dB, the QPSK systems are impractical while the BPSK system performs well.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":337873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of MILCOM '94\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of MILCOM '94\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.1994.474017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of MILCOM '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.1994.474017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对相干光学二相移键控(BPSK)和正交相移键控(QPSK)外差通信接收机进行了比较研究。首先,假设两个系统分别具有0.5 dB和2.5 dB的功率损失,对两个接收器进行分析。在相同误码率为10/sup -10/的情况下,对激光线宽、比特率、信号功率和相位误差进行了分析。比较了两种接收机的灵敏度。其次,给出了两种系统的信噪比优化、周期滑移和非周期滑移误码概率的计算。最后,比较了不同激光线宽/比特率和误码率(10/sup -3/和10/sup -1/)下的误码率与光子数/比特(E/sub pb/)的关系。结果表明,为了达到相同的性能,QPSK接收机需要比BPSK接收机更大的功率。在0.5 dB的功率损失下,QPSK系统是不切实际的,而BPSK系统表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of optical BPSK and QPSK heterodyne lightwave systems
A comparative study of the coherent optical binary phase shift keying (BPSK) and quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) heterodyne communication receivers is presented. First, both receivers are analyzed assuming two systems with a 0.5 dB and 2.5 dB power penalty. The analysis is performed in terms of laser linewidth, bit rate signal power and phase error for the same bit error rate 10/sup -10/. The sensitivities of the two types of receivers are compared. Second, calculations of the signal to noise ratio (SNR) optimum, probability of bit error with cycle slippage and non-cycle slippage for both systems are presented. Finally, the comparison in terms of BER versus number of photons/bit (E/sub pb/) for different laser linewidth/bit rates and bit error rate 10/sup -3/ and 10/sup -1/ are presented. It is shown that the QPSK receiver requires a larger amount of power than the BPSK receiver to achieve the same performance. At the power penalty of 0.5 dB, the QPSK systems are impractical while the BPSK system performs well.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive blind equalization and tracking of fading channels using antenna arrays 10 Gb/s transmission field experiment over 360 km conventional fiber Modeling and simulation of ATM/BISDN enterprise networks Frequency-hop signaling and multiple packets per transmission for store and forward packet radio networks Digital interference on binary-phase-shift-keyed signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1