马来西亚政策制定的动态:新经济政策与国家发展政策的制定

H. Leong
{"title":"马来西亚政策制定的动态:新经济政策与国家发展政策的制定","authors":"H. Leong","doi":"10.1080/02598272.1992.10800269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy formulation in Malaysia, like in many Third World countries, is essentially a centrally directed exercise. While the formulation process is somewhat open to public opinion and interest group influence, it is nonetheless a relatively autonomous administrative act. The comment by a longtime observer of Malaysian politics on the policy-making process is indicative: \"Increasingly, the processes of public policy-making and evaluation have been centralized and cloaked in secrecy.\" Such an attribute is prevalent in the formulation of most policies in Malaysia. It suggests that most policy inputs and outputs are systematically determined by the government bureaucracy before proposals are made available to the public for debate and discussion. While the general bearings of policy outcome are relatively predictable, the political process of input and interest articulation is not. The relationship between public policy input and social variables such as ethnic and class interests are important in the Malaysian context. Both factors have exerted pressures on the building process of political agenda inside as well as outside the government. On the whole, ethnicity and class as the determining motifs of major policy issues have made the Malaysian political process both volatile and impetuous. This is especially the case in the late 1980s and early 1990s when the Malaysian polity seems to be more fragmented than before.","PeriodicalId":333221,"journal":{"name":"The Asian Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamics of Policy-Making in Malaysia: The Formulation of the New Economic Policy and the National Development Policy\",\"authors\":\"H. Leong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02598272.1992.10800269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policy formulation in Malaysia, like in many Third World countries, is essentially a centrally directed exercise. While the formulation process is somewhat open to public opinion and interest group influence, it is nonetheless a relatively autonomous administrative act. The comment by a longtime observer of Malaysian politics on the policy-making process is indicative: \\\"Increasingly, the processes of public policy-making and evaluation have been centralized and cloaked in secrecy.\\\" Such an attribute is prevalent in the formulation of most policies in Malaysia. It suggests that most policy inputs and outputs are systematically determined by the government bureaucracy before proposals are made available to the public for debate and discussion. While the general bearings of policy outcome are relatively predictable, the political process of input and interest articulation is not. The relationship between public policy input and social variables such as ethnic and class interests are important in the Malaysian context. Both factors have exerted pressures on the building process of political agenda inside as well as outside the government. On the whole, ethnicity and class as the determining motifs of major policy issues have made the Malaysian political process both volatile and impetuous. This is especially the case in the late 1980s and early 1990s when the Malaysian polity seems to be more fragmented than before.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.1992.10800269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.1992.10800269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

像许多第三世界国家一样,马来西亚的政策制定基本上是一项中央指导的工作。虽然制定过程在一定程度上受到舆论和利益集团的影响,但它仍然是一种相对自主的行政行为。一位长期观察马来西亚政治的人士对政策制定过程的评论具有指示性:“公共政策制定和评估的过程越来越集中,而且隐藏在秘密之中。”这种属性在马来西亚大多数政策的制定中都很普遍。报告指出,大多数政策投入和产出都是由政府官僚机构系统地决定的,然后才向公众提供提案以供辩论和讨论。虽然政策结果的总体影响是相对可预测的,但投入和利益表达的政治过程却不可预测。在马来西亚的背景下,公共政策投入与种族和阶级利益等社会变量之间的关系很重要。这两个因素都对政府内外政治议程的构建过程施加了压力。总的来说,种族和阶级作为重大政策问题的决定性主题,使马来西亚的政治进程既不稳定又冲动。上世纪80年代末和90年代初尤其如此,当时马来西亚的政体似乎比以前更加分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamics of Policy-Making in Malaysia: The Formulation of the New Economic Policy and the National Development Policy
Policy formulation in Malaysia, like in many Third World countries, is essentially a centrally directed exercise. While the formulation process is somewhat open to public opinion and interest group influence, it is nonetheless a relatively autonomous administrative act. The comment by a longtime observer of Malaysian politics on the policy-making process is indicative: "Increasingly, the processes of public policy-making and evaluation have been centralized and cloaked in secrecy." Such an attribute is prevalent in the formulation of most policies in Malaysia. It suggests that most policy inputs and outputs are systematically determined by the government bureaucracy before proposals are made available to the public for debate and discussion. While the general bearings of policy outcome are relatively predictable, the political process of input and interest articulation is not. The relationship between public policy input and social variables such as ethnic and class interests are important in the Malaysian context. Both factors have exerted pressures on the building process of political agenda inside as well as outside the government. On the whole, ethnicity and class as the determining motifs of major policy issues have made the Malaysian political process both volatile and impetuous. This is especially the case in the late 1980s and early 1990s when the Malaysian polity seems to be more fragmented than before.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economy and the Re-invention of the Mexican State Public Enterprises in Saudi Arabia: An Introduction to their Development, Management and Change The State as Retainer: A Basis of Public Partnerships with Civil Institutions Selling Elk Hills: The Political Economy of US Federal Divestment Emerging Patterns of Governance: Synergy, Partnerships and the Public-Private Mix
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1