{"title":"预测TCQ的改进Viterbi算法","authors":"T. Ji, W. Stark","doi":"10.1109/DCC.1999.785689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. A hybrid trellis-tree search algorithm, the H-PTCQ, which has the same storage requirement as PTCQ and, is presented. We assume 2 survivor paths are kept at each state. It is straightforward to extend the algorithm to the cases where n/spl ges/2. Simulation is conducted over 20-second speech samples using DPCM, PTCQ and H-PTCQ. The data sequence is truncated into blocks of 1024 samples. The optimal codebooks for a memoryless Laplacian source are used. Predictor coefficients for the 1st-order and 2nd-order predictors are {0.8456} and {1.3435, -0.5888}, respectively. Simulation results indicate that both PTCQ and H-PTCQ have about 3 dB gain over DPCM. H-PTCQ with 8-state convolutional code has about 0.2 to 0.3 db gain over PTCQ for the same trellis size; H-PTCQ with 256-state convolutional code has 0.05 to 0.1 dB gain over the PTCQ counterpart. Compared with a 2M-state PTCQ, the M-state H-PTCQ has the same computational complexity and uses half of the path memory. Since the performance improvement of an an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ is about 0.4 dB for a similar set of data, the 0.2 to 0.3 dB gain obtained by using H-PTCQ is quite remarkable. Notice that H-PTQ enables a transmitter to adapt performance according to the resource constraints without changing PTCQ receivers. It is also interesting to observe that the 0.1 dB gain of an 8-state TCQ against a 4-state TCQ plus the 0.3 dB gain of H-PTCQ is about the gain of an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ. The results for 256-state quantization also agree with this observation. Therefore, we conclude that most of the gain of a 2M- over M-state PTCQ comes from the better internal TCQ quantizer, and mostly from the better prediction by keeping more paths.","PeriodicalId":103598,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings DCC'99 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No. PR00096)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Viterbi algorithm for predictive TCQ\",\"authors\":\"T. Ji, W. Stark\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DCC.1999.785689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. A hybrid trellis-tree search algorithm, the H-PTCQ, which has the same storage requirement as PTCQ and, is presented. We assume 2 survivor paths are kept at each state. It is straightforward to extend the algorithm to the cases where n/spl ges/2. Simulation is conducted over 20-second speech samples using DPCM, PTCQ and H-PTCQ. The data sequence is truncated into blocks of 1024 samples. The optimal codebooks for a memoryless Laplacian source are used. Predictor coefficients for the 1st-order and 2nd-order predictors are {0.8456} and {1.3435, -0.5888}, respectively. Simulation results indicate that both PTCQ and H-PTCQ have about 3 dB gain over DPCM. H-PTCQ with 8-state convolutional code has about 0.2 to 0.3 db gain over PTCQ for the same trellis size; H-PTCQ with 256-state convolutional code has 0.05 to 0.1 dB gain over the PTCQ counterpart. Compared with a 2M-state PTCQ, the M-state H-PTCQ has the same computational complexity and uses half of the path memory. Since the performance improvement of an an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ is about 0.4 dB for a similar set of data, the 0.2 to 0.3 dB gain obtained by using H-PTCQ is quite remarkable. Notice that H-PTQ enables a transmitter to adapt performance according to the resource constraints without changing PTCQ receivers. It is also interesting to observe that the 0.1 dB gain of an 8-state TCQ against a 4-state TCQ plus the 0.3 dB gain of H-PTCQ is about the gain of an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ. The results for 256-state quantization also agree with this observation. Therefore, we conclude that most of the gain of a 2M- over M-state PTCQ comes from the better internal TCQ quantizer, and mostly from the better prediction by keeping more paths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings DCC'99 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No. PR00096)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings DCC'99 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No. PR00096)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DCC.1999.785689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings DCC'99 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No. PR00096)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DCC.1999.785689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary form only given. A hybrid trellis-tree search algorithm, the H-PTCQ, which has the same storage requirement as PTCQ and, is presented. We assume 2 survivor paths are kept at each state. It is straightforward to extend the algorithm to the cases where n/spl ges/2. Simulation is conducted over 20-second speech samples using DPCM, PTCQ and H-PTCQ. The data sequence is truncated into blocks of 1024 samples. The optimal codebooks for a memoryless Laplacian source are used. Predictor coefficients for the 1st-order and 2nd-order predictors are {0.8456} and {1.3435, -0.5888}, respectively. Simulation results indicate that both PTCQ and H-PTCQ have about 3 dB gain over DPCM. H-PTCQ with 8-state convolutional code has about 0.2 to 0.3 db gain over PTCQ for the same trellis size; H-PTCQ with 256-state convolutional code has 0.05 to 0.1 dB gain over the PTCQ counterpart. Compared with a 2M-state PTCQ, the M-state H-PTCQ has the same computational complexity and uses half of the path memory. Since the performance improvement of an an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ is about 0.4 dB for a similar set of data, the 0.2 to 0.3 dB gain obtained by using H-PTCQ is quite remarkable. Notice that H-PTQ enables a transmitter to adapt performance according to the resource constraints without changing PTCQ receivers. It is also interesting to observe that the 0.1 dB gain of an 8-state TCQ against a 4-state TCQ plus the 0.3 dB gain of H-PTCQ is about the gain of an 8-state PTCQ over a 4-state PTCQ. The results for 256-state quantization also agree with this observation. Therefore, we conclude that most of the gain of a 2M- over M-state PTCQ comes from the better internal TCQ quantizer, and mostly from the better prediction by keeping more paths.