社区问题审查:鼓励公民参与的知识结晶

Feng Sun, Guoray Cai
{"title":"社区问题审查:鼓励公民参与的知识结晶","authors":"Feng Sun, Guoray Cai","doi":"10.1145/3085228.3085293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civic engagement in public decision-making requires that people form opinions or judgments based on the insights and knowledge around a public issue. Such knowledge is often not easily accessible by citizens because information about a policy issue tends to be scattered and buried in large and complex sources of potentially diluted and messy data. This creates information barriers that prevent ordinary citizens from effectively participating in government issues. We present an approach to addressing this problem that involves crystallizing the bits and pieces of knowledge scattered in the data into a form of knowledge that is well-framed, compact, and trustworthy to the citizens. This approach is articulated as a knowledge crystallization framework that specify the goals and processes of crystallizing policy knowledge. Following this framework, we present a concrete process, community issue review (CIR), that can be practiced as public decision analysis tools in a variety of community contexts. We implemented and used CIR in evaluating a real community proposal and observed the positive impact on the level of engagement. In the same time, we received feedback on how the CIR process and the supporting technology can be improved or be made more flexible to support best practices.","PeriodicalId":416111,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community Issue Review: Crystallizing Knowledge for Encouraging Civic Engagement\",\"authors\":\"Feng Sun, Guoray Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3085228.3085293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Civic engagement in public decision-making requires that people form opinions or judgments based on the insights and knowledge around a public issue. Such knowledge is often not easily accessible by citizens because information about a policy issue tends to be scattered and buried in large and complex sources of potentially diluted and messy data. This creates information barriers that prevent ordinary citizens from effectively participating in government issues. We present an approach to addressing this problem that involves crystallizing the bits and pieces of knowledge scattered in the data into a form of knowledge that is well-framed, compact, and trustworthy to the citizens. This approach is articulated as a knowledge crystallization framework that specify the goals and processes of crystallizing policy knowledge. Following this framework, we present a concrete process, community issue review (CIR), that can be practiced as public decision analysis tools in a variety of community contexts. We implemented and used CIR in evaluating a real community proposal and observed the positive impact on the level of engagement. In the same time, we received feedback on how the CIR process and the supporting technology can be improved or be made more flexible to support best practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公民参与公共决策要求人们根据对公共问题的见解和知识形成意见或判断。这类知识通常不容易被公民获取,因为有关政策问题的信息往往是分散的,并隐藏在可能被稀释和混乱的庞大而复杂的数据来源中。这造成了信息障碍,使普通公民无法有效参与政府事务。我们提出了一种解决这一问题的方法,将分散在数据中的知识碎片结晶为一种框架良好、紧凑且值得公民信赖的知识形式。这种方法是作为一个知识结晶框架来阐述的,该框架指定了政策知识结晶化的目标和过程。在这个框架下,我们提出了一个具体的过程,社区问题审查(CIR),它可以作为各种社区背景下的公共决策分析工具来实践。我们在评估一个真实的社区提案时实施并使用了CIR,并观察到其对参与水平的积极影响。同时,我们收到了关于如何改进CIR流程和支持技术或使其更灵活以支持最佳实践的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community Issue Review: Crystallizing Knowledge for Encouraging Civic Engagement
Civic engagement in public decision-making requires that people form opinions or judgments based on the insights and knowledge around a public issue. Such knowledge is often not easily accessible by citizens because information about a policy issue tends to be scattered and buried in large and complex sources of potentially diluted and messy data. This creates information barriers that prevent ordinary citizens from effectively participating in government issues. We present an approach to addressing this problem that involves crystallizing the bits and pieces of knowledge scattered in the data into a form of knowledge that is well-framed, compact, and trustworthy to the citizens. This approach is articulated as a knowledge crystallization framework that specify the goals and processes of crystallizing policy knowledge. Following this framework, we present a concrete process, community issue review (CIR), that can be practiced as public decision analysis tools in a variety of community contexts. We implemented and used CIR in evaluating a real community proposal and observed the positive impact on the level of engagement. In the same time, we received feedback on how the CIR process and the supporting technology can be improved or be made more flexible to support best practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Citizens' Use of Microblogging During Emergency: A Case Study on Water Contamination in Shanghai Session details: Cyber Security Understanding the Potential of Mobile Government in Developing Countries: The Case of Short Message Service (SMS) Use by a Brazilian State Government Session details: Beyond Bureaucracy Session details: Open Government Data Policies and Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1