{"title":"基于需求的BPMN扩展开发:临床路径的案例","authors":"Richard Braun, H. Schlieter","doi":"10.1109/REBPM.2014.6890734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) has evolved to one of the most applied modelling General Purpose Languages in the Business Process Management discipline. Due to its application in different domains, it becomes frequently necessary to extend the BPMN by domain-specific concepts. Extending the BPMN fosters an adequate communication between system engineers and domain experts and enhances the semantically correct representation of the domain. Therefore, the BPMN meta-model provides an extension mechanism. However, there is a remarkable lack in procedure models for the design of such extensions. This research article outlines an extension method that focuses on domain analysis, extension requirements and the derivation of domain-specific extension concepts within BPMN. Therefore, the method of STROPPI ET AL. (2011) is extended in regard to domain analysis. The approach is motivated and demonstrated by the case of Clinical Pathways (CPs).","PeriodicalId":134982,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on the Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requirements-based development of BPMN extensions: The case of clinical pathways\",\"authors\":\"Richard Braun, H. Schlieter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REBPM.2014.6890734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) has evolved to one of the most applied modelling General Purpose Languages in the Business Process Management discipline. Due to its application in different domains, it becomes frequently necessary to extend the BPMN by domain-specific concepts. Extending the BPMN fosters an adequate communication between system engineers and domain experts and enhances the semantically correct representation of the domain. Therefore, the BPMN meta-model provides an extension mechanism. However, there is a remarkable lack in procedure models for the design of such extensions. This research article outlines an extension method that focuses on domain analysis, extension requirements and the derivation of domain-specific extension concepts within BPMN. Therefore, the method of STROPPI ET AL. (2011) is extended in regard to domain analysis. The approach is motivated and demonstrated by the case of Clinical Pathways (CPs).\",\"PeriodicalId\":134982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on the Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on the Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REBPM.2014.6890734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on the Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REBPM.2014.6890734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

近年来,业务流程模型和符号(BPMN)已经发展成为业务流程管理规程中应用最广泛的建模通用语言之一。由于BPMN在不同领域的应用,经常需要通过特定于领域的概念来扩展BPMN。扩展BPMN促进了系统工程师和领域专家之间的充分沟通,并增强了领域的语义正确表示。因此,BPMN元模型提供了一种扩展机制。然而,设计这类扩展的过程模型明显缺乏。这篇研究文章概述了一种扩展方法,该方法侧重于BPMN中的领域分析、扩展需求和特定于领域的扩展概念的派生。因此,对STROPPI ET AL.(2011)的方法在域分析方面进行了扩展。该方法是由临床途径(CPs)的案例激发和证明的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Requirements-based development of BPMN extensions: The case of clinical pathways
In recent years, the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) has evolved to one of the most applied modelling General Purpose Languages in the Business Process Management discipline. Due to its application in different domains, it becomes frequently necessary to extend the BPMN by domain-specific concepts. Extending the BPMN fosters an adequate communication between system engineers and domain experts and enhances the semantically correct representation of the domain. Therefore, the BPMN meta-model provides an extension mechanism. However, there is a remarkable lack in procedure models for the design of such extensions. This research article outlines an extension method that focuses on domain analysis, extension requirements and the derivation of domain-specific extension concepts within BPMN. Therefore, the method of STROPPI ET AL. (2011) is extended in regard to domain analysis. The approach is motivated and demonstrated by the case of Clinical Pathways (CPs).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Requirements engineering process improvement: Analyzing the organizational culture impact and implementing an empirical study to evaluate the benefits of improvement Requirements-based development of BPMN extensions: The case of clinical pathways An IT-driven business model design methodology and its evaluation Deriving user requirements from business process models for automation: A case study Towards business alignment of IT services in universities: Challenges in elicitations of requirements for IT services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1