{"title":"宫颈后角和宫颈长度对无产妇女成功引产的预测作用","authors":"Karam M. Bayoumy, A. Yehia, M. Salman, N. Alkady","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17770.1037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:To assess the value of pre-induction sonographic assessment of the posterior cervical angle (PCA) and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor (IOL).Patients and Methods:The present prospective observational study included IOL candidates who had their PCA and cervical length assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain-Shams Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, from 1st November 2018 to 31st May 2019. The accuracy of these tests in predicting successful IOL (defined as vaginal delivery) was compared.Results: The analysis included 41 women with successful IOL and 29 women with unsuccessful IOL. The suggested cutoffs for the prediction of successful IOL were a PCA of more than 100°, a cervical length of less than 31 mm, and a Bishop score of more than four. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for these three measures were not significantly different. However, a PCA of more than 100° had the best sensitivity (87.80%), specificity (86.21), positive predictive value (90%), negative predictive value (83.3%) compared with the other two predictors.Conclusion: Posterior cervical angle had the best accuracy in predicting successful induction of labor compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posterior cervical angle and cervical length in predicting the successful induction of labour in nulliparous woman\",\"authors\":\"Karam M. Bayoumy, A. Yehia, M. Salman, N. Alkady\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17770.1037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective:To assess the value of pre-induction sonographic assessment of the posterior cervical angle (PCA) and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor (IOL).Patients and Methods:The present prospective observational study included IOL candidates who had their PCA and cervical length assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain-Shams Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, from 1st November 2018 to 31st May 2019. The accuracy of these tests in predicting successful IOL (defined as vaginal delivery) was compared.Results: The analysis included 41 women with successful IOL and 29 women with unsuccessful IOL. The suggested cutoffs for the prediction of successful IOL were a PCA of more than 100°, a cervical length of less than 31 mm, and a Bishop score of more than four. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for these three measures were not significantly different. However, a PCA of more than 100° had the best sensitivity (87.80%), specificity (86.21), positive predictive value (90%), negative predictive value (83.3%) compared with the other two predictors.Conclusion: Posterior cervical angle had the best accuracy in predicting successful induction of labor compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score\",\"PeriodicalId\":224226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17770.1037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17770.1037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:探讨引产前超声评估宫颈后角(PCA)和宫颈长度对人工智能(IOL)成功的预测价值。患者和方法:本前瞻性观察性研究包括2018年11月1日至2019年5月31日在埃及开罗Ain-Shams妇产医院妇产科接受经阴道超声检查和Bishop评分评估PCA和宫颈长度的IOL患者。比较了这些测试在预测成功人工晶状体(定义为阴道分娩)方面的准确性。结果:41例人工晶状体手术成功,29例人工晶状体手术失败。预测人工晶状体成功的临界值是PCA大于100°,宫颈长度小于31 mm, Bishop评分大于4分。三种测量方法的受试者工作特征曲线下面积无显著差异。然而,与其他两种预测因子相比,大于100°的PCA具有最佳的敏感性(87.80%),特异性(86.21),阳性预测值(90%),阴性预测值(83.3%)。结论:与宫颈长度和Bishop评分相比,颈后角预测引产成功的准确性最高
Posterior cervical angle and cervical length in predicting the successful induction of labour in nulliparous woman
Objective:To assess the value of pre-induction sonographic assessment of the posterior cervical angle (PCA) and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor (IOL).Patients and Methods:The present prospective observational study included IOL candidates who had their PCA and cervical length assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain-Shams Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, from 1st November 2018 to 31st May 2019. The accuracy of these tests in predicting successful IOL (defined as vaginal delivery) was compared.Results: The analysis included 41 women with successful IOL and 29 women with unsuccessful IOL. The suggested cutoffs for the prediction of successful IOL were a PCA of more than 100°, a cervical length of less than 31 mm, and a Bishop score of more than four. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for these three measures were not significantly different. However, a PCA of more than 100° had the best sensitivity (87.80%), specificity (86.21), positive predictive value (90%), negative predictive value (83.3%) compared with the other two predictors.Conclusion: Posterior cervical angle had the best accuracy in predicting successful induction of labor compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score