等离子体放电产生臭氧:活化空气和活化燃料/空气混合物的比较

Ghazanfar Mehdi, M. D. Giorgi, D. Fontanarosa, S. Bonuso, A. Ficarella
{"title":"等离子体放电产生臭氧:活化空气和活化燃料/空气混合物的比较","authors":"Ghazanfar Mehdi, M. D. Giorgi, D. Fontanarosa, S. Bonuso, A. Ficarella","doi":"10.1115/gt2021-60167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study focused on the comparative analysis about the production of ozone and active radicals in presence of nanopulsed plasma discharge on air and on fuel/air mixture to investigate its effect on combustion enhancement. This analysis is based on numerical modeling of air and methane/air plasma discharge with different repetition rates (100 Hz, 1000 Hz and 10000 Hz). To this purpose, a two-step approach has been proposed based on two different chemistry solvers: a 0-D plasma chemistry solver (ZDPlasKin toolbox) and a combustion chemistry solver (CHEMKIN software suite). Consequently, a comprehensive chemical kinetic scheme was generated including both plasma excitation reactions and gas phase reactions. Validation of air and methane/air mechanisms was performed with experimental data. Kinetic models of both air and methane/air provides good fitting with experimental data of O atom generation and decay process. ZDPlasKin results were introduced in CHEMKIN in order to analyze combustion enhancement. It was found that the concentrations of O3 and O atom in air are higher than the methane/air activation. However, during the air activation peak concentration of ozone was significantly increased with repetition rates and maximum was observed at 10000 Hz. Furthermore, ignition timings and flammability limits were also improved with air and methane/air activation but the impact of methane/air activation was comparatively higher.","PeriodicalId":395231,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3B: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ozone Production With Plasma Discharge: Comparisons Between Activated Air and Activated Fuel/Air Mixture\",\"authors\":\"Ghazanfar Mehdi, M. D. Giorgi, D. Fontanarosa, S. Bonuso, A. Ficarella\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/gt2021-60167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study focused on the comparative analysis about the production of ozone and active radicals in presence of nanopulsed plasma discharge on air and on fuel/air mixture to investigate its effect on combustion enhancement. This analysis is based on numerical modeling of air and methane/air plasma discharge with different repetition rates (100 Hz, 1000 Hz and 10000 Hz). To this purpose, a two-step approach has been proposed based on two different chemistry solvers: a 0-D plasma chemistry solver (ZDPlasKin toolbox) and a combustion chemistry solver (CHEMKIN software suite). Consequently, a comprehensive chemical kinetic scheme was generated including both plasma excitation reactions and gas phase reactions. Validation of air and methane/air mechanisms was performed with experimental data. Kinetic models of both air and methane/air provides good fitting with experimental data of O atom generation and decay process. ZDPlasKin results were introduced in CHEMKIN in order to analyze combustion enhancement. It was found that the concentrations of O3 and O atom in air are higher than the methane/air activation. However, during the air activation peak concentration of ozone was significantly increased with repetition rates and maximum was observed at 10000 Hz. Furthermore, ignition timings and flammability limits were also improved with air and methane/air activation but the impact of methane/air activation was comparatively higher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3B: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3B: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-60167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3B: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-60167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究通过对比分析纳米脉冲等离子体放电对空气和燃料/空气混合物中臭氧和活性自由基的产生,探讨纳米脉冲等离子体放电对燃烧增强的影响。该分析基于不同重复频率(100hz, 1000hz和10000hz)的空气和甲烷/空气等离子体放电的数值模拟。为此,提出了一种基于两种不同化学求解器的两步方法:0-D等离子体化学求解器(ZDPlasKin工具箱)和燃烧化学求解器(CHEMKIN软件套件)。因此,生成了一个包括等离子体激发反应和气相反应的综合化学动力学方案。用实验数据验证了空气和甲烷/空气机理。空气和甲烷/空气的动力学模型与氧原子生成和衰变过程的实验数据拟合较好。在CHEMKIN中引入了ZDPlasKin结果,以分析燃烧增强。结果表明,空气中O3和O原子的浓度高于甲烷/空气活化。然而,在空气活化过程中,臭氧峰值浓度随着重复频率的增加而显著增加,并在10000 Hz处观察到最大值。此外,空气和甲烷/空气活化也改善了点火时间和可燃性极限,但甲烷/空气活化的影响相对较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ozone Production With Plasma Discharge: Comparisons Between Activated Air and Activated Fuel/Air Mixture
This study focused on the comparative analysis about the production of ozone and active radicals in presence of nanopulsed plasma discharge on air and on fuel/air mixture to investigate its effect on combustion enhancement. This analysis is based on numerical modeling of air and methane/air plasma discharge with different repetition rates (100 Hz, 1000 Hz and 10000 Hz). To this purpose, a two-step approach has been proposed based on two different chemistry solvers: a 0-D plasma chemistry solver (ZDPlasKin toolbox) and a combustion chemistry solver (CHEMKIN software suite). Consequently, a comprehensive chemical kinetic scheme was generated including both plasma excitation reactions and gas phase reactions. Validation of air and methane/air mechanisms was performed with experimental data. Kinetic models of both air and methane/air provides good fitting with experimental data of O atom generation and decay process. ZDPlasKin results were introduced in CHEMKIN in order to analyze combustion enhancement. It was found that the concentrations of O3 and O atom in air are higher than the methane/air activation. However, during the air activation peak concentration of ozone was significantly increased with repetition rates and maximum was observed at 10000 Hz. Furthermore, ignition timings and flammability limits were also improved with air and methane/air activation but the impact of methane/air activation was comparatively higher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling of Flashback With Different Blends of CH4 and H2 by Using Finite Rate Chemistry With Large Eddy Simulation Experimental and Numerical Advancement of the MGT Combustor Towards Higher Hydrogen Capabilities Flame Response of a Lean Premixed Swirl Flame to High Frequency Azimuthal Forcing FGM Applied to Grid Plate Flame Stabilisers for NOx Prediction in Non-Premixed Gas Turbine Combustion Characterization of Flame Behavior and Blowout Limits at Different Air Preheating Temperatures in Plasma Assisted Stabilized Combustor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1