注意我们的礼仪:会计作为社会规范

S. Sunder
{"title":"注意我们的礼仪:会计作为社会规范","authors":"S. Sunder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.733743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accounting standardization project, kicked off by the passage of U.S. securities laws in the 1930s, has steadily gained momentum over seven decades. Today, written standards dominate accounting thought, practice, regulation, instruction, even research. Generally accepted accounting principles - originally a mere description in its plain English meaning - have since been capitalized into a proper name - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - and now describes rules and regulations issued by authorities with power to inflict punishment on those who do not to accept them. How and why did financial reporting get caught in the standardization project, replacing norms of corporate and professional behaviour by written rules and standards? What are the consequences of this transformation? What alternative courses are available to accounting and corporate governance? I argue that heavy reliance on the codification of financial reporting has been a wrong path. A shift from rules towards norms of behaviour may yet help accounting and corporate governance recover a better balance.","PeriodicalId":221915,"journal":{"name":"CGA: Regulations & Standards for Corporate Reporting & Governance (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"91","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minding Our Manners: Accounting as Social Norms\",\"authors\":\"S. Sunder\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.733743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The accounting standardization project, kicked off by the passage of U.S. securities laws in the 1930s, has steadily gained momentum over seven decades. Today, written standards dominate accounting thought, practice, regulation, instruction, even research. Generally accepted accounting principles - originally a mere description in its plain English meaning - have since been capitalized into a proper name - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - and now describes rules and regulations issued by authorities with power to inflict punishment on those who do not to accept them. How and why did financial reporting get caught in the standardization project, replacing norms of corporate and professional behaviour by written rules and standards? What are the consequences of this transformation? What alternative courses are available to accounting and corporate governance? I argue that heavy reliance on the codification of financial reporting has been a wrong path. A shift from rules towards norms of behaviour may yet help accounting and corporate governance recover a better balance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGA: Regulations & Standards for Corporate Reporting & Governance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"91\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGA: Regulations & Standards for Corporate Reporting & Governance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.733743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGA: Regulations & Standards for Corporate Reporting & Governance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.733743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

摘要

会计标准化项目始于上世纪30年代美国证券法的通过,70年来一直稳步发展。今天,书面准则主导着会计思想、实践、监管、指导,甚至研究。公认会计原则——最初只是一个简单的英文描述——后来被大写成一个合适的名字——公认会计原则——现在用来描述那些有权对不接受这些原则的人施加惩罚的当局颁布的规章制度。财务报告是如何以及为什么陷入标准化项目,用书面规则和标准取代企业和专业行为规范?这种转变的后果是什么?会计和公司治理有哪些替代课程?我认为,严重依赖财务报告的法典化是一条错误的道路。从规则向行为规范的转变可能有助于会计和公司治理更好地恢复平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minding Our Manners: Accounting as Social Norms
The accounting standardization project, kicked off by the passage of U.S. securities laws in the 1930s, has steadily gained momentum over seven decades. Today, written standards dominate accounting thought, practice, regulation, instruction, even research. Generally accepted accounting principles - originally a mere description in its plain English meaning - have since been capitalized into a proper name - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - and now describes rules and regulations issued by authorities with power to inflict punishment on those who do not to accept them. How and why did financial reporting get caught in the standardization project, replacing norms of corporate and professional behaviour by written rules and standards? What are the consequences of this transformation? What alternative courses are available to accounting and corporate governance? I argue that heavy reliance on the codification of financial reporting has been a wrong path. A shift from rules towards norms of behaviour may yet help accounting and corporate governance recover a better balance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minding Our Manners: Accounting as Social Norms Executive Compensation at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Regulation of UK Corporate Governance: Lessons from Accounting, Audit and Financial Services A New Way to Govern: Because 'World Best Practices' are the Problem Not the Solution Corporate Governance in Italy after the 1998 Reform: What Role for Institutional Investors?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1