{"title":"稀疏扳手、仿真器和减径快捷键的下限","authors":"Shang-En Huang, S. Pettie","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove better lower bounds on additive spanners and emulators, which are lossy compression schemes for undirected graphs, as well as lower bounds on shortcut sets, which reduce the diameter of directed graphs. We show that any $O(n)$-size shortcut set cannot bring the diameter below $\\Omega(n^{1/6})$, and that any $O(m)$-size shortcut set cannot bring it below $\\Omega(n^{1/11})$. These improve Hesse's [Hesse03] lower bound of $\\Omega(n^{1/17})$. By combining these constructions with Abboud and Bodwin's [AbboudB17] edge-splitting technique, we get additive stretch lower bounds of $+\\Omega(n^{1/13})$ for $O(n)$-size spanners and $+\\Omega(n^{1/18})$ for $O(n)$-size emulators. These improve Abboud and Bodwin's $+\\Omega(n^{1/22})$ lower bounds.","PeriodicalId":447445,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower Bounds on Sparse Spanners, Emulators, and Diameter-reducing shortcuts\",\"authors\":\"Shang-En Huang, S. Pettie\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We prove better lower bounds on additive spanners and emulators, which are lossy compression schemes for undirected graphs, as well as lower bounds on shortcut sets, which reduce the diameter of directed graphs. We show that any $O(n)$-size shortcut set cannot bring the diameter below $\\\\Omega(n^{1/6})$, and that any $O(m)$-size shortcut set cannot bring it below $\\\\Omega(n^{1/11})$. These improve Hesse's [Hesse03] lower bound of $\\\\Omega(n^{1/17})$. By combining these constructions with Abboud and Bodwin's [AbboudB17] edge-splitting technique, we get additive stretch lower bounds of $+\\\\Omega(n^{1/13})$ for $O(n)$-size spanners and $+\\\\Omega(n^{1/18})$ for $O(n)$-size emulators. These improve Abboud and Bodwin's $+\\\\Omega(n^{1/22})$ lower bounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lower Bounds on Sparse Spanners, Emulators, and Diameter-reducing shortcuts
We prove better lower bounds on additive spanners and emulators, which are lossy compression schemes for undirected graphs, as well as lower bounds on shortcut sets, which reduce the diameter of directed graphs. We show that any $O(n)$-size shortcut set cannot bring the diameter below $\Omega(n^{1/6})$, and that any $O(m)$-size shortcut set cannot bring it below $\Omega(n^{1/11})$. These improve Hesse's [Hesse03] lower bound of $\Omega(n^{1/17})$. By combining these constructions with Abboud and Bodwin's [AbboudB17] edge-splitting technique, we get additive stretch lower bounds of $+\Omega(n^{1/13})$ for $O(n)$-size spanners and $+\Omega(n^{1/18})$ for $O(n)$-size emulators. These improve Abboud and Bodwin's $+\Omega(n^{1/22})$ lower bounds.