基于灵敏度分析的简单加性加权法的学生奖学金获得者决策支持系统

Fata Nidaul Khasanah, Rahmadya Trias Handayanto, Herlawati Herlawati, Djuni Thamrin, Prasojo Prasojo, E. S. Hutahaean
{"title":"基于灵敏度分析的简单加性加权法的学生奖学金获得者决策支持系统","authors":"Fata Nidaul Khasanah, Rahmadya Trias Handayanto, Herlawati Herlawati, Djuni Thamrin, Prasojo Prasojo, E. S. Hutahaean","doi":"10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scholarship recipients should ideally be given to the appropriate students. Many methods have been widely used to assist the school management in deciding the scholarship recipients. However, such methods do not give additional information and other methods of comparison. The purpose of this research is to provide a systematic and objective scholarship selection recommendation system and using sensitivity analysis to compare the two decision support methods used, i.e. the Simple Additive Weighting and the Weighted Product methods. The Simple Additive Weighting method provides the highest assessment results, namely alternatives with a preference value of 13.27. The Weighted Product method provides the highest assessment results, namely alternatives with a preference value of 0.046. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the total change value of the Simple Additive Weighting method was 6%, while in the Weighted Product method the total change value was 0.2%. Therefore, the sensitivity analysis showed that the Simple Additive Weighting method better than Weighted Product in determining the scholarship recipient recommendation because it has a greater total change value.","PeriodicalId":413610,"journal":{"name":"2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Support System For Student Scholarship Recipients Using Simple Additive Weighting Method with Sensitivity Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Fata Nidaul Khasanah, Rahmadya Trias Handayanto, Herlawati Herlawati, Djuni Thamrin, Prasojo Prasojo, E. S. Hutahaean\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scholarship recipients should ideally be given to the appropriate students. Many methods have been widely used to assist the school management in deciding the scholarship recipients. However, such methods do not give additional information and other methods of comparison. The purpose of this research is to provide a systematic and objective scholarship selection recommendation system and using sensitivity analysis to compare the two decision support methods used, i.e. the Simple Additive Weighting and the Weighted Product methods. The Simple Additive Weighting method provides the highest assessment results, namely alternatives with a preference value of 13.27. The Weighted Product method provides the highest assessment results, namely alternatives with a preference value of 0.046. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the total change value of the Simple Additive Weighting method was 6%, while in the Weighted Product method the total change value was 0.2%. Therefore, the sensitivity analysis showed that the Simple Additive Weighting method better than Weighted Product in determining the scholarship recipient recommendation because it has a greater total change value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

奖学金获得者最好是分配给合适的学生。许多方法被广泛用于协助学校管理部门决定奖学金获得者。然而,这种方法不能提供额外的信息和其他比较方法。本研究的目的是提供一个系统、客观的奖学金选择推荐系统,并利用敏感性分析对所使用的两种决策支持方法,即简单加性加权法和加权乘积法进行比较。简单加性加权法的评价结果最高,即优选值为13.27的备选方案。加权乘积法的评价结果最高,即优选值为0.046的备选方案。敏感性分析结果表明,简单加性加权法的总变化值为6%,加权积法的总变化值为0.2%。因此,敏感性分析表明,简单加性加权法具有更大的总变化值,在确定奖学金获得者推荐方面优于加权乘积法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision Support System For Student Scholarship Recipients Using Simple Additive Weighting Method with Sensitivity Analysis
The scholarship recipients should ideally be given to the appropriate students. Many methods have been widely used to assist the school management in deciding the scholarship recipients. However, such methods do not give additional information and other methods of comparison. The purpose of this research is to provide a systematic and objective scholarship selection recommendation system and using sensitivity analysis to compare the two decision support methods used, i.e. the Simple Additive Weighting and the Weighted Product methods. The Simple Additive Weighting method provides the highest assessment results, namely alternatives with a preference value of 13.27. The Weighted Product method provides the highest assessment results, namely alternatives with a preference value of 0.046. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the total change value of the Simple Additive Weighting method was 6%, while in the Weighted Product method the total change value was 0.2%. Therefore, the sensitivity analysis showed that the Simple Additive Weighting method better than Weighted Product in determining the scholarship recipient recommendation because it has a greater total change value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Task Design for Indonesian Cultural Heritage Data Collection with Crowdsourcing PenalViz: A Web-Based Visualization Tool for the Indonesian Penal Code Examining GOJEK Drivers' Loyalty: The Influence of GOJEK's Partnership Mechanism and Service Quality Modeling and Analysis of Three-Phase Active Power Filter Integrated Photovoltaic as a Reactive Power Compensator Using the Simulink Matlab Tool An Evaluation of Internet Addiction Test (IAT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1