{"title":"金融研究评论中的共同作者偏袒?","authors":"Emre Kuvvet","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3695634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether the coauthors of executive editors of the Review of Financial Studies published more papers during the editor’ tenure. The paper finds that not all executive editors are created equal concerning their impartiality toward their coauthors. The results show that George Andrew Karolyi’s coauthors published more articles during his tenure relative to the control period and that, proxied by the number of citations, the quality of those articles were lower.","PeriodicalId":208149,"journal":{"name":"Finance Educator: Courses","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coauthor Favoritism in the Review of Financial Studies?\",\"authors\":\"Emre Kuvvet\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3695634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines whether the coauthors of executive editors of the Review of Financial Studies published more papers during the editor’ tenure. The paper finds that not all executive editors are created equal concerning their impartiality toward their coauthors. The results show that George Andrew Karolyi’s coauthors published more articles during his tenure relative to the control period and that, proxied by the number of citations, the quality of those articles were lower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Educator: Courses\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Educator: Courses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3695634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Educator: Courses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3695634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究考察了《金融研究评论》执行编辑的合著者是否在编辑任期内发表了更多的论文。本文发现,并不是所有的执行编辑在对待共同作者的公正性上都是平等的。结果表明,在George Andrew Karolyi任职期间,其合著者发表的文章数量相对于对照期有所增加,但从被引次数来看,这些文章的质量较低。
Coauthor Favoritism in the Review of Financial Studies?
This study examines whether the coauthors of executive editors of the Review of Financial Studies published more papers during the editor’ tenure. The paper finds that not all executive editors are created equal concerning their impartiality toward their coauthors. The results show that George Andrew Karolyi’s coauthors published more articles during his tenure relative to the control period and that, proxied by the number of citations, the quality of those articles were lower.