战国时期百家争鸣与君主专制理论的发展

Liu Zehua
{"title":"战国时期百家争鸣与君主专制理论的发展","authors":"Liu Zehua","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467220158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, the phenomenon of the momentary emergence of many schools of thought and philosophies at about the same time and the contention and debate among them, creating a great deal of \"noise\"—the phenomenon often referred to in Chinese history and culture as Baijia zhengming (The contention among a hundred schools)—is considered to be something that promotes freedom of thought and social democracy and, in turn, is promoted by them. However, if we were to turn the pages of history to the section on the Warring States period in Chinese history, we would discover a stunning phenomenon that would cause us to gape in astonishment: There, we find, the result of the contention of the many schools was not the growth of a political democracy (or democratic politics) or the enlivening and activating of democratic ideas; on the contrary, the contention greatly promoted the development and \"perfection\" of the theory of monarchical autocracy, or despotism. In reality, too, the development of politics was in confor...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contending among the Hundred Schools of Thought during the Warring States Period and the Development of the Theory of Monarchical Autocracy\",\"authors\":\"Liu Zehua\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/CSP1097-1467220158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In general, the phenomenon of the momentary emergence of many schools of thought and philosophies at about the same time and the contention and debate among them, creating a great deal of \\\"noise\\\"—the phenomenon often referred to in Chinese history and culture as Baijia zhengming (The contention among a hundred schools)—is considered to be something that promotes freedom of thought and social democracy and, in turn, is promoted by them. However, if we were to turn the pages of history to the section on the Warring States period in Chinese history, we would discover a stunning phenomenon that would cause us to gape in astonishment: There, we find, the result of the contention of the many schools was not the growth of a political democracy (or democratic politics) or the enlivening and activating of democratic ideas; on the contrary, the contention greatly promoted the development and \\\"perfection\\\" of the theory of monarchical autocracy, or despotism. In reality, too, the development of politics was in confor...\",\"PeriodicalId\":162534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Studies in Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Studies in Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467220158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467220158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一般来说,许多学派和哲学在大约同一时间短暂出现,并在它们之间争论和辩论,产生大量“噪音”的现象-在中国历史和文化中经常被称为百家争鸣(百家争鸣)的现象-被认为是促进思想自由和社会民主的事情,反过来又被它们所促进。然而,如果我们把历史的书页翻到中国历史上的战国时期,我们会发现一个惊人的现象,让我们目瞪口呆:在那里,我们发现,许多学派争论的结果并不是政治民主(或民主政治)的成长,也不是民主思想的活跃和激活;相反,这种争论极大地促进了君主专制或专制理论的发展和“完善”。实际上,政治的发展也处于停滞状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Contending among the Hundred Schools of Thought during the Warring States Period and the Development of the Theory of Monarchical Autocracy
In general, the phenomenon of the momentary emergence of many schools of thought and philosophies at about the same time and the contention and debate among them, creating a great deal of "noise"—the phenomenon often referred to in Chinese history and culture as Baijia zhengming (The contention among a hundred schools)—is considered to be something that promotes freedom of thought and social democracy and, in turn, is promoted by them. However, if we were to turn the pages of history to the section on the Warring States period in Chinese history, we would discover a stunning phenomenon that would cause us to gape in astonishment: There, we find, the result of the contention of the many schools was not the growth of a political democracy (or democratic politics) or the enlivening and activating of democratic ideas; on the contrary, the contention greatly promoted the development and "perfection" of the theory of monarchical autocracy, or despotism. In reality, too, the development of politics was in confor...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adhering to the Criterion of Practice, Regaining an Understanding of Socialism The Law of Sufficlent Reason is an Important Law of Formal Logic Uphold Theories of Development and Oppose Theories of Stagnation The Structure of Color Language Comrade, Master/Teacher, Mister, and Boss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1