A. Gołda, A. Kamińska, Ł. Wyciślik
{"title":"Modele publikacyjne w nauce o kulturze","authors":"A. Gołda, A. Kamińska, Ł. Wyciślik","doi":"10.4467/20843860pk.21.007.13461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Publication Models in the Science of Culture\n\nThis article examines quantitatively the patterns of research phenomena being observed during last years in the field of cultural studies basing on the data acquired from Scopus – one of the biggest scientific bibliographic databases. The authors of the article were inspired to undertake such research from the recent amendment of Polish legislation called the Constitution for Science, which promotes inter-institutional and international research. Therefore, the results of the investigation were prepared for all countries publishing in Scopus indexed literature, but with particular emphasis on Polish participation. The conducted research allowed to identify the dominant publication languages in the studied field, the quantitative publication share of individual countries, the average number of authors per one publication from a given country, but also made it possible to identify countries willing to cooperate with each other, which was visualized on the so-called cooperation maps. In addition, Polish and global scientific productivity measured by the number of articles was embedded in the so-called Polish “ministerial list” of journals, which may give Polish scientists of the field of cultural studies hints on the choice of a journal dealing with relevant topics and being indexed in the Scopus database.","PeriodicalId":187788,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Kulturoznawczy","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Kulturoznawczy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860pk.21.007.13461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文化科学的出版模式本文根据从最大的科学书目数据库之一Scopus获得的数据,定量地考察了过去几年在文化研究领域观察到的研究现象的模式。这篇文章的作者受到波兰最近修订的一项名为《科学宪法》的立法的启发,进行了这样的研究,这项立法促进了机构间和国际间的研究。因此,调查结果是为所有在Scopus索引文献中发表的国家准备的,但特别强调波兰的参与。所进行的研究可以确定所研究领域的主要出版语言、个别国家的数量出版物份额、某一国家每份出版物的平均作者人数,但也可以确定愿意相互合作的国家,这在所谓的合作地图上是可视化的。此外,以文章数量衡量的波兰和全球科学生产力被列入所谓的波兰“部长级”期刊清单,这可能会给文化研究领域的波兰科学家提供选择涉及相关主题的期刊并在Scopus数据库中索引的提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modele publikacyjne w nauce o kulturze
Publication Models in the Science of Culture This article examines quantitatively the patterns of research phenomena being observed during last years in the field of cultural studies basing on the data acquired from Scopus – one of the biggest scientific bibliographic databases. The authors of the article were inspired to undertake such research from the recent amendment of Polish legislation called the Constitution for Science, which promotes inter-institutional and international research. Therefore, the results of the investigation were prepared for all countries publishing in Scopus indexed literature, but with particular emphasis on Polish participation. The conducted research allowed to identify the dominant publication languages in the studied field, the quantitative publication share of individual countries, the average number of authors per one publication from a given country, but also made it possible to identify countries willing to cooperate with each other, which was visualized on the so-called cooperation maps. In addition, Polish and global scientific productivity measured by the number of articles was embedded in the so-called Polish “ministerial list” of journals, which may give Polish scientists of the field of cultural studies hints on the choice of a journal dealing with relevant topics and being indexed in the Scopus database.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nasze postludzkie pragnienia i pożądania (Recenzja książki Jana Stasieńki Media Technologies and Posthuman Intimacy) Fotografia wobec krzyku pamięci zagłady spod betonu masowego turyzmu Feministyczna hałda pamięci Po przemyśle. Humanistyka wobec bioruin i biogruzów Rzeczy getta warszawskiego - rozmowa o sprawczości, materialności i witalności zabytków archeologicznych jako muzealiów
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1