Fratila和其他v SSWP [2021] UKSC 53

Judicial Review Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10854681.2022.2063661

Georgina Fenton

{"title":"Fratila和其他v SSWP [2021] UKSC 53","authors":"Georgina Fenton","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2063661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. In Fratila, the claimants – two Romanian nationals living in the UK with pre-settled status (PSS) granted under the EU Settlement Scheme – had their applications for Universal Credit (UC) refused on the basis that they did not have a qualifying right to reside. This is because the amendment the 2019 Regulations made to the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (‘the 2013 Regulations’) – specifically the addition of reg 9 (3)(d)(i) – prevents leave to remain in the UK arising from PSS from constituting a qualifying right of residence for the purposes of UC applications.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fratila and another v SSWP [2021] UKSC 53\",\"authors\":\"Georgina Fenton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2063661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2. In Fratila, the claimants – two Romanian nationals living in the UK with pre-settled status (PSS) granted under the EU Settlement Scheme – had their applications for Universal Credit (UC) refused on the basis that they did not have a qualifying right to reside. This is because the amendment the 2019 Regulations made to the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (‘the 2013 Regulations’) – specifically the addition of reg 9 (3)(d)(i) – prevents leave to remain in the UK arising from PSS from constituting a qualifying right of residence for the purposes of UC applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2063661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2063661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2. 在Fratila，索赔人——两名居住在英国的罗马尼亚国民，根据欧盟定居计划获得了预先定居身份(PSS)——他们的通用信贷(UC)申请被拒绝，理由是他们没有资格居住。这是因为2019年《条例》对《2013年通用信贷条例》(“2013年条例”)进行了修订，特别是增加了第9 (3)(d)(i)条，禁止PSS引起的英国居留许可构成UC申请的合格居留权。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Fratila and another v SSWP [2021] UKSC 53

2. In Fratila, the claimants – two Romanian nationals living in the UK with pre-settled status (PSS) granted under the EU Settlement Scheme – had their applications for Universal Credit (UC) refused on the basis that they did not have a qualifying right to reside. This is because the amendment the 2019 Regulations made to the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (‘the 2013 Regulations’) – specifically the addition of reg 9 (3)(d)(i) – prevents leave to remain in the UK arising from PSS from constituting a qualifying right of residence for the purposes of UC applications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Judicial Review

自引率

0.00%

发文量