{"title":"心灵胜过肉体?污名、凝视与自我","authors":"A. Spafford","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2023.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"novelty is fragile and staring volatile because the longer we look, the more accustomed a once surprising sight becomes . . . seeing disability reminds us of what Bryan s. Turner (2006) calls “ontological contingency,” the truth of our body’s vulnerability to the randomness of fate. Each one of us ineluctably acquires one or more disabilities—naming them variably as illness, disease, injury, old age, failure, dysfunction, or dependence.1","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind over Body? Stigma, Staring, and the Self\",\"authors\":\"A. Spafford\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/gyr.2023.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"novelty is fragile and staring volatile because the longer we look, the more accustomed a once surprising sight becomes . . . seeing disability reminds us of what Bryan s. Turner (2006) calls “ontological contingency,” the truth of our body’s vulnerability to the randomness of fate. Each one of us ineluctably acquires one or more disabilities—naming them variably as illness, disease, injury, old age, failure, dysfunction, or dependence.1\",\"PeriodicalId\":385309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2023.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goethe Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2023.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
新奇是脆弱的,凝视是不稳定的,因为我们看的时间越长,对曾经令人惊讶的景象就变得越习惯……看到残疾让我们想起Bryan s. Turner(2006)所说的“本体论偶然性”,即我们的身体在命运的随机性面前是脆弱的事实。我们每个人都不可避免地会有一种或多种残疾——我们把它们命名为疾病、疾病、损伤、衰老、失败、功能障碍或依赖
novelty is fragile and staring volatile because the longer we look, the more accustomed a once surprising sight becomes . . . seeing disability reminds us of what Bryan s. Turner (2006) calls “ontological contingency,” the truth of our body’s vulnerability to the randomness of fate. Each one of us ineluctably acquires one or more disabilities—naming them variably as illness, disease, injury, old age, failure, dysfunction, or dependence.1