Soon-Deok Park, Y. Uh, I. Jang, K. Yoon, Jong‐Hee Shin
{"title":"血培养念珠菌ATB FUNGUS 2与VITEK-2抗真菌药敏试验(AST-YS01)的比较","authors":"Soon-Deok Park, Y. Uh, I. Jang, K. Yoon, Jong‐Hee Shin","doi":"10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.3.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The VITEK-2 yeast susceptibility test (AST-YS01; bioMerieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA) has recently been introduced as a fully automated, commercial antifungal susceptibility test system that determines MIC endpoints spectrophotometrically, thereby eliminating subjective errors. We compared the ATB FUNGUS 2 (bioMe rieux) and VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) systems to the CLSI M27 method for susceptibility testing of Candida isolates. Methods: We tested 59 Candida species that were isolated from blood cultures at Wonju Christian Hospital between September 2008 and August 2009. We compared MIC results for amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole and voriconazole using the ATB FUNGUS 2 and VITEK-2 (AST-YS01) tests to those obtained by the CLSI M27 broth microdilution method. Results: Within two-fold dilutions of MICs, the agreement of the ATB FUNGUS 2 and VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) tests with the CLSI method according to antifungal agents were: amphotericin B, 100% vs. 100% flucytosine, 100% vs. 100% fluconazole, 83.6% vs. 98.3% and voriconazole, 83.6% vs. 96.7%, respectively. The categorical discrepancies for fluconazole and voriconazole were 20.4% and 18.6% for ATB FUNGUS 2, and 6.8% and 0% for VITEK-2 (ASTYS01). There were no major errors for fluconazole and voriconazole in either ATB FUNGUS 2 or VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) tests. Conclusion: The VITEK-2 system (AST-YS01) appears to be rapid and highly correlative with the CLSI method, suggesting that it is effective for antifungal susceptibility testing for Candida species in clinical settings. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13: 114-120)","PeriodicalId":143093,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of ATB FUNGUS 2 and VITEK-2 Antifungal Susceptibility (AST-YS01) Tests for Candida Species Isolated from Blood Culture\",\"authors\":\"Soon-Deok Park, Y. Uh, I. Jang, K. Yoon, Jong‐Hee Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.3.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The VITEK-2 yeast susceptibility test (AST-YS01; bioMerieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA) has recently been introduced as a fully automated, commercial antifungal susceptibility test system that determines MIC endpoints spectrophotometrically, thereby eliminating subjective errors. We compared the ATB FUNGUS 2 (bioMe rieux) and VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) systems to the CLSI M27 method for susceptibility testing of Candida isolates. Methods: We tested 59 Candida species that were isolated from blood cultures at Wonju Christian Hospital between September 2008 and August 2009. We compared MIC results for amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole and voriconazole using the ATB FUNGUS 2 and VITEK-2 (AST-YS01) tests to those obtained by the CLSI M27 broth microdilution method. Results: Within two-fold dilutions of MICs, the agreement of the ATB FUNGUS 2 and VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) tests with the CLSI method according to antifungal agents were: amphotericin B, 100% vs. 100% flucytosine, 100% vs. 100% fluconazole, 83.6% vs. 98.3% and voriconazole, 83.6% vs. 96.7%, respectively. The categorical discrepancies for fluconazole and voriconazole were 20.4% and 18.6% for ATB FUNGUS 2, and 6.8% and 0% for VITEK-2 (ASTYS01). There were no major errors for fluconazole and voriconazole in either ATB FUNGUS 2 or VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) tests. Conclusion: The VITEK-2 system (AST-YS01) appears to be rapid and highly correlative with the CLSI method, suggesting that it is effective for antifungal susceptibility testing for Candida species in clinical settings. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13: 114-120)\",\"PeriodicalId\":143093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.3.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.3.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
背景:VITEK-2酵母药敏试验(AST-YS01;bioMerieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA)最近推出了一种全自动商用抗真菌药敏测试系统,可以分光光度法确定MIC端点,从而消除主观误差。我们比较了ATB FUNGUS 2 (bioMe rieux)和VITEK-2 (ASTYS01)系统与CLSI M27方法对念珠菌分离株的药敏试验。方法:对2008年9月~ 2009年8月元州基督教医院血培养分离的59种念珠菌进行检测。我们比较了ATB FUNGUS 2和VITEK-2 (AST-YS01)试验对两性霉素B、氟胞嘧啶、氟康唑和伏立康唑的MIC结果与CLSI M27肉汤微量稀释法获得的结果。结果:在mic的2倍稀释度范围内,ATB FUNGUS 2和VITEK-2 (ASTYS01)的CLSI法检测抗真菌药物的一致性分别为两性霉素B, 100% vs 100%氟胞嘧啶,100% vs 100%氟康唑,83.6% vs 98.3%,伏立康唑,83.6% vs 96.7%。氟康唑和伏立康唑对ATB FUNGUS 2的分类差异分别为20.4%和18.6%,对VITEK-2 (ASTYS01)的分类差异分别为6.8%和0%。氟康唑和伏立康唑在ATB FUNGUS 2和VITEK-2 (ASTYS01)试验中均无重大错误。结论:VITEK-2系统(AST-YS01)快速且与CLSI法高度相关,可用于临床假丝酵母菌的药敏检测。(中华临床微生物学杂志2010;13:114-120)
Comparison of ATB FUNGUS 2 and VITEK-2 Antifungal Susceptibility (AST-YS01) Tests for Candida Species Isolated from Blood Culture
Background: The VITEK-2 yeast susceptibility test (AST-YS01; bioMerieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA) has recently been introduced as a fully automated, commercial antifungal susceptibility test system that determines MIC endpoints spectrophotometrically, thereby eliminating subjective errors. We compared the ATB FUNGUS 2 (bioMe rieux) and VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) systems to the CLSI M27 method for susceptibility testing of Candida isolates. Methods: We tested 59 Candida species that were isolated from blood cultures at Wonju Christian Hospital between September 2008 and August 2009. We compared MIC results for amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole and voriconazole using the ATB FUNGUS 2 and VITEK-2 (AST-YS01) tests to those obtained by the CLSI M27 broth microdilution method. Results: Within two-fold dilutions of MICs, the agreement of the ATB FUNGUS 2 and VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) tests with the CLSI method according to antifungal agents were: amphotericin B, 100% vs. 100% flucytosine, 100% vs. 100% fluconazole, 83.6% vs. 98.3% and voriconazole, 83.6% vs. 96.7%, respectively. The categorical discrepancies for fluconazole and voriconazole were 20.4% and 18.6% for ATB FUNGUS 2, and 6.8% and 0% for VITEK-2 (ASTYS01). There were no major errors for fluconazole and voriconazole in either ATB FUNGUS 2 or VITEK-2 (ASTYS01) tests. Conclusion: The VITEK-2 system (AST-YS01) appears to be rapid and highly correlative with the CLSI method, suggesting that it is effective for antifungal susceptibility testing for Candida species in clinical settings. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13: 114-120)