规范小说创作与小说世界

IF 1 2区 艺术学 0 ART JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM Pub Date : 2019-08-04 DOI:10.1111/jaac.12660
MANUEL GARCÍA-CARPINTERO
{"title":"规范小说创作与小说世界","authors":"MANUEL GARCÍA-CARPINTERO","doi":"10.1111/jaac.12660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In recent work, Kendall Walton has abandoned his very influential account of the fictionality of <i>p</i> in a fictional work in terms of prescriptions to imagine emanating from it. He offers examples allegedly showing that a prescription to imagine <i>p</i> in a given work of fiction is not sufficient for the fictionality of <i>p</i> in that work. In this article, both in support and further elaboration of a constitutive-norms speech-act variation on Walton's account that I have defended previously, I critically discuss his objections. In addition to answering his concerns and developing the account further, I provide additional abductive support for its explanatory virtues vis-à-vis institutional accounts like Walton's and Gricean speech-act proposals.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51571,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM","volume":"77 3","pages":"267-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jaac.12660","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative Fiction-Making and the World of the Fiction\",\"authors\":\"MANUEL GARCÍA-CARPINTERO\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jaac.12660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In recent work, Kendall Walton has abandoned his very influential account of the fictionality of <i>p</i> in a fictional work in terms of prescriptions to imagine emanating from it. He offers examples allegedly showing that a prescription to imagine <i>p</i> in a given work of fiction is not sufficient for the fictionality of <i>p</i> in that work. In this article, both in support and further elaboration of a constitutive-norms speech-act variation on Walton's account that I have defended previously, I critically discuss his objections. In addition to answering his concerns and developing the account further, I provide additional abductive support for its explanatory virtues vis-à-vis institutional accounts like Walton's and Gricean speech-act proposals.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM\",\"volume\":\"77 3\",\"pages\":\"267-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jaac.12660\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jaac.12660\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jaac.12660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

在最近的研究中,肯德尔·沃尔顿(Kendall Walton)放弃了他对虚构作品中p的虚构性的非常有影响力的描述,即从p衍生出的想象处方。他举了一些例子来证明在一部给定的小说中想象p的规定并不足以证明小说中p的虚构性。在这篇文章中,为了支持和进一步阐述我之前为沃尔顿辩护的构成规范的言论行为变体,我批判性地讨论了他的反对意见。除了回答他的担忧并进一步发展该理论,我还为其解释性优点提供了额外的溯因性支持,与-à-vis沃尔顿和格赖斯的语言行为建议等机构理论相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Normative Fiction-Making and the World of the Fiction

In recent work, Kendall Walton has abandoned his very influential account of the fictionality of p in a fictional work in terms of prescriptions to imagine emanating from it. He offers examples allegedly showing that a prescription to imagine p in a given work of fiction is not sufficient for the fictionality of p in that work. In this article, both in support and further elaboration of a constitutive-norms speech-act variation on Walton's account that I have defended previously, I critically discuss his objections. In addition to answering his concerns and developing the account further, I provide additional abductive support for its explanatory virtues vis-à-vis institutional accounts like Walton's and Gricean speech-act proposals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism publishes current research articles, symposia, special issues, and timely book reviews in aesthetics and the arts. The term aesthetics, in this connection, is understood to include all studies of the arts and related types of experience from a philosophic, scientific, or other theoretical standpoint. The arts are taken to include not only the traditional forms such as music, literature, landscape architecture, dance, painting, architecture, sculpture, and other visual arts, but also more recent additions such as photography, film, earthworks, performance and conceptual art, the crafts and decorative arts, contemporary digital innovations, and other cultural practices, including work and activities in the field of popular culture.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Comic in the Midst of Tragedy's Grief with Tig Notaro, Hannah Gadsby, and Others Winning Over the Audience: Trust and Humor in Stand-Up Comedy What Could It Mean to Say That Today's Stand-Up Audiences Are Too Sensitive? Comic Impossibilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1