多重PCR的应用是否有助于儿科急诊医师对2岁以下急性呼吸道感染患儿的管理?

O. Aydın, Bengu Baydur, I. Baba, A. Alp, O. Teksam
{"title":"多重PCR的应用是否有助于儿科急诊医师对2岁以下急性呼吸道感染患儿的管理?","authors":"O. Aydın, Bengu Baydur, I. Baba, A. Alp, O. Teksam","doi":"10.4274/jpea.2023.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used to detect respiratory viruses in pediatric emergency departments, but its indications and interpretation of results must still be clear. In the present study, we examined the effect of detecting a viral agent with multiplex PCR on patient management. Infants and toddlers, aged between 1-24 months, who presented to the pediatric emergency department with respiratory tract infection complaints and underwent multiplex-PCR between 1 January 2014 and 28 February 2020 were included in the study. Patients with at least one agent detected were considered as the study group, and patients without detection were considered as the control group. The same design was implemented only for patients with chronic diseases. A total of 1106 patients were recruited [median age: 6.7 months (range: 2.9-13.0 months)]. Seven hundred and eighty-nine in the study group and 317 in the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in hospital admissions (study group: 271 admissions; control group: 89 admissions; p=0.055), length of hospital stay duration [mean ± standard deviation: 3.09±7.87 days (study group) and 2.6±7.79 days (control group); p=0.045], or antibiotic use [234 patients (study group) and 77 patients (control group); p=0.078]. When these variables were examined only for those with chronic diseases, there was no difference again. Although multiplex PCR is an ideal method with high sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness, the limits of its clinical application need to be clarified. We did not observe significant differences in the treatment of patients with detected viral agents.","PeriodicalId":118905,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pediatric Academy","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Use of Multiplex PCR Contribute to the Management of Paediatric Emergency Physicians in <2-Year-old Children with Acute Respiratory Infections?\",\"authors\":\"O. Aydın, Bengu Baydur, I. Baba, A. Alp, O. Teksam\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/jpea.2023.207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used to detect respiratory viruses in pediatric emergency departments, but its indications and interpretation of results must still be clear. In the present study, we examined the effect of detecting a viral agent with multiplex PCR on patient management. Infants and toddlers, aged between 1-24 months, who presented to the pediatric emergency department with respiratory tract infection complaints and underwent multiplex-PCR between 1 January 2014 and 28 February 2020 were included in the study. Patients with at least one agent detected were considered as the study group, and patients without detection were considered as the control group. The same design was implemented only for patients with chronic diseases. A total of 1106 patients were recruited [median age: 6.7 months (range: 2.9-13.0 months)]. Seven hundred and eighty-nine in the study group and 317 in the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in hospital admissions (study group: 271 admissions; control group: 89 admissions; p=0.055), length of hospital stay duration [mean ± standard deviation: 3.09±7.87 days (study group) and 2.6±7.79 days (control group); p=0.045], or antibiotic use [234 patients (study group) and 77 patients (control group); p=0.078]. When these variables were examined only for those with chronic diseases, there was no difference again. Although multiplex PCR is an ideal method with high sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness, the limits of its clinical application need to be clarified. We did not observe significant differences in the treatment of patients with detected viral agents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Pediatric Academy\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Pediatric Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/jpea.2023.207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pediatric Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jpea.2023.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)用于儿科急诊科检测呼吸道病毒,但其适应症和结果的解释仍然必须明确。在本研究中,我们研究了多重PCR检测病毒因子对患者管理的影响。在2014年1月1日至2020年2月28日期间,因呼吸道感染主诉到儿科急诊科就诊并接受多重pcr检查的1-24个月的婴幼儿被纳入研究。检测到至少一种药物的患者被视为研究组,未检测到的患者被视为对照组。同样的设计只适用于慢性病患者。共招募了1106例患者[中位年龄:6.7个月(范围:2.9-13.0个月)]。研究组有789人对照组有317人。两组住院人数无显著差异(研究组:271人;对照组89人;P =0.055)、住院时间[平均±标准差:研究组3.09±7.87天,对照组2.6±7.79天;P =0.045],或抗生素使用[研究组234例,对照组77例];p = 0.078)。当这些变量仅针对慢性病患者进行检查时,再次没有差异。虽然多重PCR是一种理想的方法,具有较高的灵敏度、特异性和成本效益,但其临床应用的局限性需要明确。我们没有观察到对检测到病毒制剂的患者的治疗有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does the Use of Multiplex PCR Contribute to the Management of Paediatric Emergency Physicians in <2-Year-old Children with Acute Respiratory Infections?
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used to detect respiratory viruses in pediatric emergency departments, but its indications and interpretation of results must still be clear. In the present study, we examined the effect of detecting a viral agent with multiplex PCR on patient management. Infants and toddlers, aged between 1-24 months, who presented to the pediatric emergency department with respiratory tract infection complaints and underwent multiplex-PCR between 1 January 2014 and 28 February 2020 were included in the study. Patients with at least one agent detected were considered as the study group, and patients without detection were considered as the control group. The same design was implemented only for patients with chronic diseases. A total of 1106 patients were recruited [median age: 6.7 months (range: 2.9-13.0 months)]. Seven hundred and eighty-nine in the study group and 317 in the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in hospital admissions (study group: 271 admissions; control group: 89 admissions; p=0.055), length of hospital stay duration [mean ± standard deviation: 3.09±7.87 days (study group) and 2.6±7.79 days (control group); p=0.045], or antibiotic use [234 patients (study group) and 77 patients (control group); p=0.078]. When these variables were examined only for those with chronic diseases, there was no difference again. Although multiplex PCR is an ideal method with high sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness, the limits of its clinical application need to be clarified. We did not observe significant differences in the treatment of patients with detected viral agents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome Involving a Celio-Mesenteric Trunk-a Lesson Learnt Effects of Treatment Model on Bone Metabolism in Patients with Severe Hemophilia A Vitamin D Levels in Growth-Paining Children Clinical Profile, Laboratory Characteristics and Treatment of Wilson’s Disease in Children from Western India A Narrative Review: Transforming Pediatric Oncology Care Through Virtual Reality - Pain Management and Enhanced Patient Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1