聚氯乙烯胶粘剂和纳米改性聚氯乙烯胶粘剂的装订强度质量评价

G. Petković, Suzana Pasanec Preprotić, Marina Vukoje
{"title":"聚氯乙烯胶粘剂和纳米改性聚氯乙烯胶粘剂的装订强度质量评价","authors":"G. Petković, Suzana Pasanec Preprotić, Marina Vukoje","doi":"10.24867/GRID-2018-P13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most common and cost-effective book binding method is adhesive binding method suitable for medium volume books (50-250 pages). Depending on run volume and printing technology, different adhesive binding techniques can be used. In this research, for short run book production, doublefan binding was used, because it can achieve up to 20% higher binding strength compared to perfect binding technique. In addition, for adhesive binding book production, polyvinyl acetate dispersions (PVAc), hot-melts (HM) and polyurethane adhesives (PUR) can be used. Today, water-based PVAc adhesives are more environmentally acceptable and numerous studies dealing with modification of PVAc adhesives have been carried out, in order to achieve the comparable or higher quality of adhesive joints for selected application. The aim of this research is to improve the binding performance of PVAc adhesive by adding 1% of nanoparticles, specifically hydrophobic fumed silica (SiO2) or hydrophilic fumed titanium dioxide (TiO2) powder. ISO specifies a test method (ISO 19594) for the quality assessment of adhesive binding by pulling out a single sheet from a book block, page-pull test. Pulled sheets have to be evaluated visually and in a consistent manner, since during the procedure the sheet can be pulled out completely without significant damage, raptured roughly parallel to the binding edge, raptured not parallel to the binding edge or show significant adhesive penetration. In this research, the binding strength of 8 specimens, at 4 different test positions (10%, 25%, 50% and 90% of the total number of pages), for 5 different groups of book blocks and 3 different types of PVAc adhesive (neat PVAc, PVAc + 1% SiO2, PVAc + 1% TiO2) was evaluated. All the measurements were performed under the same conditions (volume, trimmed size, binding technique and conditions, drying and pressing time). For the evaluation of quality assessment of bookbinding strength, different paper types were used for each group woodfree uncoated, woodfree coated, containing wood – bulky, woodfree office and office paper containing recycled fibres. According to ISO 19594 standard, quality levels for the binding strength of adhesive bound products are not enough. It is also necessary to calculate the coefficient of variation in order to evaluate the consistency of binding quality. According to obtained results, visual evaluation of test sheets and book blocks opening behaviour, the best quality was achieved for book blocks with PVAc + 1% SiO2 adhesive. Compared to a neat PVAc, the binding strength for all groups of book blocks was 10 26% higher while coefficient of variation was 43 – 71% lower. Results for PVAc + 1% TiO2 adhesive did not show any significant improvement or deterioration of the binding strength while coefficient of variation was notably lower, 4% 58%, compared to neat PVAc.","PeriodicalId":371126,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF BOOKBINDING STRENGTH FOR POLYVINYL ACETATE ADHESIVE (PVAc) AND NANO-MODIFIED PVAc ADHESIVES\",\"authors\":\"G. Petković, Suzana Pasanec Preprotić, Marina Vukoje\",\"doi\":\"10.24867/GRID-2018-P13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most common and cost-effective book binding method is adhesive binding method suitable for medium volume books (50-250 pages). Depending on run volume and printing technology, different adhesive binding techniques can be used. In this research, for short run book production, doublefan binding was used, because it can achieve up to 20% higher binding strength compared to perfect binding technique. In addition, for adhesive binding book production, polyvinyl acetate dispersions (PVAc), hot-melts (HM) and polyurethane adhesives (PUR) can be used. Today, water-based PVAc adhesives are more environmentally acceptable and numerous studies dealing with modification of PVAc adhesives have been carried out, in order to achieve the comparable or higher quality of adhesive joints for selected application. The aim of this research is to improve the binding performance of PVAc adhesive by adding 1% of nanoparticles, specifically hydrophobic fumed silica (SiO2) or hydrophilic fumed titanium dioxide (TiO2) powder. ISO specifies a test method (ISO 19594) for the quality assessment of adhesive binding by pulling out a single sheet from a book block, page-pull test. Pulled sheets have to be evaluated visually and in a consistent manner, since during the procedure the sheet can be pulled out completely without significant damage, raptured roughly parallel to the binding edge, raptured not parallel to the binding edge or show significant adhesive penetration. In this research, the binding strength of 8 specimens, at 4 different test positions (10%, 25%, 50% and 90% of the total number of pages), for 5 different groups of book blocks and 3 different types of PVAc adhesive (neat PVAc, PVAc + 1% SiO2, PVAc + 1% TiO2) was evaluated. All the measurements were performed under the same conditions (volume, trimmed size, binding technique and conditions, drying and pressing time). For the evaluation of quality assessment of bookbinding strength, different paper types were used for each group woodfree uncoated, woodfree coated, containing wood – bulky, woodfree office and office paper containing recycled fibres. According to ISO 19594 standard, quality levels for the binding strength of adhesive bound products are not enough. It is also necessary to calculate the coefficient of variation in order to evaluate the consistency of binding quality. According to obtained results, visual evaluation of test sheets and book blocks opening behaviour, the best quality was achieved for book blocks with PVAc + 1% SiO2 adhesive. Compared to a neat PVAc, the binding strength for all groups of book blocks was 10 26% higher while coefficient of variation was 43 – 71% lower. Results for PVAc + 1% TiO2 adhesive did not show any significant improvement or deterioration of the binding strength while coefficient of variation was notably lower, 4% 58%, compared to neat PVAc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24867/GRID-2018-P13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24867/GRID-2018-P13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

适用于中等体积(50-250页)书籍的胶订法是一种最常见和最具成本效益的书籍装订方法。根据印量和印刷技术的不同,可以使用不同的粘合剂装订技术。在本研究中,对于短版书籍的生产,采用双扇装订,因为它可以达到比完美的装订技术高出20%的装订强度。此外,对于粘合剂装订书的生产,可以使用聚氯乙烯分散体(PVAc),热熔胶(HM)和聚氨酯粘合剂(PUR)。如今,水性聚乙烯醇胶粘剂是更环保的接受和许多研究处理改性聚乙烯醇胶粘剂已经进行,以达到相当或更高的质量粘合接头选定的应用。本研究的目的是通过添加1%的纳米颗粒,特别是疏水气相二氧化硅(SiO2)或亲水性气相二氧化钛(TiO2)粉末,来改善PVAc胶粘剂的结合性能。ISO规定了一种测试方法(ISO 19594),通过从书块中抽出一张纸来评估粘合剂装订的质量,即页拉测试。必须以一致的方式对拉出的纸张进行视觉评估,因为在此过程中,纸张可以完全拉出而没有重大损坏,可以与装订边缘大致平行,也可以与装订边缘不平行,或者显示出明显的粘合剂渗透。在本研究中,对8个样品在4个不同的测试位置(占总页数的10%、25%、50%和90%)下,对5组不同的书块和3种不同类型的PVAc粘合剂(纯PVAc、PVAc + 1% SiO2、PVAc + 1% TiO2)进行粘接强度评价。所有的测量都是在相同的条件下进行的(体积,裁剪尺寸,装订技术和条件,干燥和压制时间)。为了评价装订强度的质量评价,对每一组无涂布木、无涂布木、含厚木、无涂布木办公用纸和含再生纤维办公用纸采用了不同的纸张类型。根据ISO 19594标准,胶粘剂装订产品的结合强度质量等级不够。为了评价粘接质量的一致性,还需要计算变异系数。根据实验结果、测试纸的视觉评价和书块的开启性能,使用PVAc + 1% SiO2胶粘剂的书块质量最好。与纯聚乙烯醇相比,本品的装订强度提高了10 26%,变异系数降低了43 ~ 71%。结果表明,与纯PVAc相比,PVAc + 1% TiO2胶粘剂的结合强度没有明显提高或下降,变异系数明显降低,为4% ~ 58%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF BOOKBINDING STRENGTH FOR POLYVINYL ACETATE ADHESIVE (PVAc) AND NANO-MODIFIED PVAc ADHESIVES
One of the most common and cost-effective book binding method is adhesive binding method suitable for medium volume books (50-250 pages). Depending on run volume and printing technology, different adhesive binding techniques can be used. In this research, for short run book production, doublefan binding was used, because it can achieve up to 20% higher binding strength compared to perfect binding technique. In addition, for adhesive binding book production, polyvinyl acetate dispersions (PVAc), hot-melts (HM) and polyurethane adhesives (PUR) can be used. Today, water-based PVAc adhesives are more environmentally acceptable and numerous studies dealing with modification of PVAc adhesives have been carried out, in order to achieve the comparable or higher quality of adhesive joints for selected application. The aim of this research is to improve the binding performance of PVAc adhesive by adding 1% of nanoparticles, specifically hydrophobic fumed silica (SiO2) or hydrophilic fumed titanium dioxide (TiO2) powder. ISO specifies a test method (ISO 19594) for the quality assessment of adhesive binding by pulling out a single sheet from a book block, page-pull test. Pulled sheets have to be evaluated visually and in a consistent manner, since during the procedure the sheet can be pulled out completely without significant damage, raptured roughly parallel to the binding edge, raptured not parallel to the binding edge or show significant adhesive penetration. In this research, the binding strength of 8 specimens, at 4 different test positions (10%, 25%, 50% and 90% of the total number of pages), for 5 different groups of book blocks and 3 different types of PVAc adhesive (neat PVAc, PVAc + 1% SiO2, PVAc + 1% TiO2) was evaluated. All the measurements were performed under the same conditions (volume, trimmed size, binding technique and conditions, drying and pressing time). For the evaluation of quality assessment of bookbinding strength, different paper types were used for each group woodfree uncoated, woodfree coated, containing wood – bulky, woodfree office and office paper containing recycled fibres. According to ISO 19594 standard, quality levels for the binding strength of adhesive bound products are not enough. It is also necessary to calculate the coefficient of variation in order to evaluate the consistency of binding quality. According to obtained results, visual evaluation of test sheets and book blocks opening behaviour, the best quality was achieved for book blocks with PVAc + 1% SiO2 adhesive. Compared to a neat PVAc, the binding strength for all groups of book blocks was 10 26% higher while coefficient of variation was 43 – 71% lower. Results for PVAc + 1% TiO2 adhesive did not show any significant improvement or deterioration of the binding strength while coefficient of variation was notably lower, 4% 58%, compared to neat PVAc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
QUALITY PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR BASE PAPER OF CORRUGATED PAPERBOARD BY DSC METHOD GRADATION, COLOUR RANGE AND COLORIMETRIC ACCURACY OF DIGITAL PROJECTOR JVC DLA-RS 15 THE INVESTIGATION OF USING ZIRCONIUM OXIDE MICROSPHERES IN PAPER COATING PRINTABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF PAPER MADE FROM A JAPANESE KNOTWEED DIFFERENCE BETWEEN USING COLOURIMETRIC VALUES (L*a*b*) OR OPTICAL DENSITY FOR RANDOM PRINT NONUNIFORMITY QUANTIFICATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1