菲涅耳透镜太阳能聚光器不同几何聚光比下锥形腔体接收器蒸汽产生性能的研究

Asrori Asrori, S. Suparman, S. Wahyudi, D. Widhiyanuriyawan
{"title":"菲涅耳透镜太阳能聚光器不同几何聚光比下锥形腔体接收器蒸汽产生性能的研究","authors":"Asrori Asrori, S. Suparman, S. Wahyudi, D. Widhiyanuriyawan","doi":"10.15587/1729-4061.2020.209778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the comparison of the performance of steam generators in large and small receivers, using a Fresnel lens concentrator. The goal is to get the best value from the efficiency of a steam generator between large and small receivers, with the following task details: a) design a conical cavity receiver that has the most efficient geometric concentration ratio; b) compare the thermal efficiency of conical cavity receivers that have different geometric concentration ratios; c) analyze the potential of the steam energy from the conical cavity receiver produced by the PMMA Fresnel lens concentrator based on the amount of average radiation directly at the study site. The study uses an experimental field research method, which is conducted outdoors. This research was conducted in the energy conversion laboratory, Universitas Brawijaya (Latitude: 7.9553° S and Longitude: 112.6145° W), in September 2019. The PMMA Fresnel lens is used for the solar thermal concentrators. The two receivers with a conical cavity that were compared were made of copper with a volume of 2 litres and 0.25 litres, respectively. They are coated with a glass wool insulator with a thickness of 10 mm. Direct Normal Irradiance (I b ) is measured by a solar power meter. The cup anemometer is used to measure wind speed (v w ) around the receiver. Digi-Sense 12 Channel Scanning Benchtop Thermometer connected to the laptop is used to measure temperature. The positions of the four K-type thermocouples are as follows: 1) ambient temperature (T a ); 2) focal point temperature (T f ); 3) receiver wall temperature (T r ); 4) steam/water temperature (T w ). A pressure gauge to measure the pressure of the steam that goes to the measuring cup was used. After saturation pressure (P sat ) has been reached, it will be known from the condensation process through the copper coil, which functions as a condenser. From the results of the study, the large receivers have specifications CR g =8 and a volume of 2 litres of water. Whereas, the small receiver is CR g =30 and 0.25 L. The large receivers can produce steam latent heat energy Q s =1.37 MJ per cycle with useful efficiency (utilization efficiency) η Th =31.81 %. Whereas the small receiver can produce steam energy, Q s =579.17 kJ per cycle with useful efficiency, η Th =33.31 %. Hence, from the two types of conical cavity receivers, small receivers have that higher effectiveness than large ones can be recommended","PeriodicalId":301695,"journal":{"name":"EnergyRN: Concentrating Solar Power (Topic)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Steam Generation Performance on Conical Cavity Receiver by Different Geometric Concentration Ratios for Fresnel Lens Solar Concentrator\",\"authors\":\"Asrori Asrori, S. Suparman, S. Wahyudi, D. Widhiyanuriyawan\",\"doi\":\"10.15587/1729-4061.2020.209778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses the comparison of the performance of steam generators in large and small receivers, using a Fresnel lens concentrator. The goal is to get the best value from the efficiency of a steam generator between large and small receivers, with the following task details: a) design a conical cavity receiver that has the most efficient geometric concentration ratio; b) compare the thermal efficiency of conical cavity receivers that have different geometric concentration ratios; c) analyze the potential of the steam energy from the conical cavity receiver produced by the PMMA Fresnel lens concentrator based on the amount of average radiation directly at the study site. The study uses an experimental field research method, which is conducted outdoors. This research was conducted in the energy conversion laboratory, Universitas Brawijaya (Latitude: 7.9553° S and Longitude: 112.6145° W), in September 2019. The PMMA Fresnel lens is used for the solar thermal concentrators. The two receivers with a conical cavity that were compared were made of copper with a volume of 2 litres and 0.25 litres, respectively. They are coated with a glass wool insulator with a thickness of 10 mm. Direct Normal Irradiance (I b ) is measured by a solar power meter. The cup anemometer is used to measure wind speed (v w ) around the receiver. Digi-Sense 12 Channel Scanning Benchtop Thermometer connected to the laptop is used to measure temperature. The positions of the four K-type thermocouples are as follows: 1) ambient temperature (T a ); 2) focal point temperature (T f ); 3) receiver wall temperature (T r ); 4) steam/water temperature (T w ). A pressure gauge to measure the pressure of the steam that goes to the measuring cup was used. After saturation pressure (P sat ) has been reached, it will be known from the condensation process through the copper coil, which functions as a condenser. From the results of the study, the large receivers have specifications CR g =8 and a volume of 2 litres of water. Whereas, the small receiver is CR g =30 and 0.25 L. The large receivers can produce steam latent heat energy Q s =1.37 MJ per cycle with useful efficiency (utilization efficiency) η Th =31.81 %. Whereas the small receiver can produce steam energy, Q s =579.17 kJ per cycle with useful efficiency, η Th =33.31 %. Hence, from the two types of conical cavity receivers, small receivers have that higher effectiveness than large ones can be recommended\",\"PeriodicalId\":301695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EnergyRN: Concentrating Solar Power (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EnergyRN: Concentrating Solar Power (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.209778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EnergyRN: Concentrating Solar Power (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.209778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文讨论了采用菲涅耳透镜聚光器的大型和小型接收器中蒸汽发生器的性能比较。目标是在大型和小型接收器之间从蒸汽发生器的效率中获得最佳值,其任务细节如下:a)设计具有最有效几何浓度比的锥形腔接收器;B)比较不同几何浓度比下锥形腔体接收机的热效率;c)根据直接在研究现场的平均辐射量,分析PMMA菲涅耳透镜聚光器产生的锥形腔接收器产生的蒸汽能量的势能。本研究采用野外实验研究方法,在室外进行。该研究于2019年9月在布拉维贾亚大学(纬度:7.9553°S,经度:112.6145°W)的能量转换实验室进行。聚光器采用PMMA菲涅耳透镜。所比较的两个带有锥形腔的接收器由铜制成,体积分别为2升和0.25升。外涂10mm厚的玻璃棉绝缘子。直接正常辐照度(ib)由太阳能功率计测量。杯形风速计用于测量接收器周围的风速(v w)。连接到笔记本电脑的Digi-Sense 12通道扫描台式温度计用于测量温度。四种k型热电偶的位置如下:1)环境温度(T a);2)焦点温度(T f);3)接收器壁温度(T r);4)蒸汽/水温度(T w)。使用压力表来测量进入量杯的蒸汽的压力。在达到饱和压力(P sat)后,将通过充当冷凝器的铜盘管从冷凝过程中得知。从研究结果来看,大型接收器的规格CR g =8,体积为2升水。小型集热管的CR =30, CR = 0.25 l,大型集热管每循环产生的蒸汽潜热Q =1.37 MJ,有效效率η Th = 31.81%。而小集热器能产生蒸汽能量,每循环Q s =579.17 kJ,有效效率η Th = 33.31%。因此,从两种类型的锥形腔接收器来看,可以推荐小型接收器比大型接收器具有更高的效率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of Steam Generation Performance on Conical Cavity Receiver by Different Geometric Concentration Ratios for Fresnel Lens Solar Concentrator
The paper discusses the comparison of the performance of steam generators in large and small receivers, using a Fresnel lens concentrator. The goal is to get the best value from the efficiency of a steam generator between large and small receivers, with the following task details: a) design a conical cavity receiver that has the most efficient geometric concentration ratio; b) compare the thermal efficiency of conical cavity receivers that have different geometric concentration ratios; c) analyze the potential of the steam energy from the conical cavity receiver produced by the PMMA Fresnel lens concentrator based on the amount of average radiation directly at the study site. The study uses an experimental field research method, which is conducted outdoors. This research was conducted in the energy conversion laboratory, Universitas Brawijaya (Latitude: 7.9553° S and Longitude: 112.6145° W), in September 2019. The PMMA Fresnel lens is used for the solar thermal concentrators. The two receivers with a conical cavity that were compared were made of copper with a volume of 2 litres and 0.25 litres, respectively. They are coated with a glass wool insulator with a thickness of 10 mm. Direct Normal Irradiance (I b ) is measured by a solar power meter. The cup anemometer is used to measure wind speed (v w ) around the receiver. Digi-Sense 12 Channel Scanning Benchtop Thermometer connected to the laptop is used to measure temperature. The positions of the four K-type thermocouples are as follows: 1) ambient temperature (T a ); 2) focal point temperature (T f ); 3) receiver wall temperature (T r ); 4) steam/water temperature (T w ). A pressure gauge to measure the pressure of the steam that goes to the measuring cup was used. After saturation pressure (P sat ) has been reached, it will be known from the condensation process through the copper coil, which functions as a condenser. From the results of the study, the large receivers have specifications CR g =8 and a volume of 2 litres of water. Whereas, the small receiver is CR g =30 and 0.25 L. The large receivers can produce steam latent heat energy Q s =1.37 MJ per cycle with useful efficiency (utilization efficiency) η Th =31.81 %. Whereas the small receiver can produce steam energy, Q s =579.17 kJ per cycle with useful efficiency, η Th =33.31 %. Hence, from the two types of conical cavity receivers, small receivers have that higher effectiveness than large ones can be recommended
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Steam Generation Performance on Conical Cavity Receiver by Different Geometric Concentration Ratios for Fresnel Lens Solar Concentrator CFD Analysis on Heat Loss from Solar Cavity Receiver of Parabolic Dish Receiver System Selling Wind
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1