“谁是我的孩子?”“-司法拒绝社区文化家庭概念对尼日利亚儿童福利的影响

Michael Attah, Elizabeth Iyamu-Ojo
{"title":"“谁是我的孩子?”“-司法拒绝社区文化家庭概念对尼日利亚儿童福利的影响","authors":"Michael Attah, Elizabeth Iyamu-Ojo","doi":"10.4236/BLR.2021.122026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of family composition remains a subjective jurisprudence in various jurisdictions. In Nigeria, legislative and judicial responses to different family forms are generally broadening under the general law in cases where there is a biological link between family members. Yet, the findings of this article indicate that family formulation under certain commune-cultural models is rejected by the courts. This article appraised judicial responses to five of such frameworks and drew attention to the negative implications of the dismissive judicial attitude to the realization of children’s rights and protection of their socio-economic welfare. Its thesis is that it is antithetic to the expansive national legislative direction on family conception, international socio-legal thoughts on family relations and directly questions the sincerity of the state’s proclaimed constitutional policy/goal of catering to the welfare of all children.","PeriodicalId":300394,"journal":{"name":"Beijing Law Review","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Who Is My Child?”—Implications of Judicial Rejection of Commune-Cultural Conceptions of the Family for Children’s Welfare in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Michael Attah, Elizabeth Iyamu-Ojo\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/BLR.2021.122026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The question of family composition remains a subjective jurisprudence in various jurisdictions. In Nigeria, legislative and judicial responses to different family forms are generally broadening under the general law in cases where there is a biological link between family members. Yet, the findings of this article indicate that family formulation under certain commune-cultural models is rejected by the courts. This article appraised judicial responses to five of such frameworks and drew attention to the negative implications of the dismissive judicial attitude to the realization of children’s rights and protection of their socio-economic welfare. Its thesis is that it is antithetic to the expansive national legislative direction on family conception, international socio-legal thoughts on family relations and directly questions the sincerity of the state’s proclaimed constitutional policy/goal of catering to the welfare of all children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beijing Law Review\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beijing Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/BLR.2021.122026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beijing Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/BLR.2021.122026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭构成问题在各个司法管辖区仍然是一个主观的法理学问题。在尼日利亚,根据一般法律,在家庭成员之间有血缘关系的情况下,对不同家庭形式的立法和司法反应一般都在扩大。然而,本文的研究结果表明,某些社区文化模式下的家庭形成被法院拒绝。本文评价了对其中五个框架的司法反应,并提请注意对实现儿童权利和保护其社会经济福利不屑一顾的司法态度所产生的消极影响。它的论点是,它与关于家庭概念的广泛的国家立法方向、关于家庭关系的国际社会法律思想背道而驰,并直接质疑国家宣布的照顾所有儿童福利的宪法政策/目标的诚意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Who Is My Child?”—Implications of Judicial Rejection of Commune-Cultural Conceptions of the Family for Children’s Welfare in Nigeria
The question of family composition remains a subjective jurisprudence in various jurisdictions. In Nigeria, legislative and judicial responses to different family forms are generally broadening under the general law in cases where there is a biological link between family members. Yet, the findings of this article indicate that family formulation under certain commune-cultural models is rejected by the courts. This article appraised judicial responses to five of such frameworks and drew attention to the negative implications of the dismissive judicial attitude to the realization of children’s rights and protection of their socio-economic welfare. Its thesis is that it is antithetic to the expansive national legislative direction on family conception, international socio-legal thoughts on family relations and directly questions the sincerity of the state’s proclaimed constitutional policy/goal of catering to the welfare of all children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Law in Wildlife Management The Incredible Shrinking Fourth Amendment —The Ongoing Erosion of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America The Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research: Ethics Guardians or Keystone Cops? Research on the Development Direction of International Commercial Arbitration Network Institutionalizing Social Norms and Legal Culture: Social Dynamics under Legal Awareness Policy in Contemporary China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1