Sirajganj地区不同水稻的生产成本和成本效益分析

S. Chanda, M. A. Ali, M. Haque, M. Abdullah, A. Sarwar
{"title":"Sirajganj地区不同水稻的生产成本和成本效益分析","authors":"S. Chanda, M. A. Ali, M. Haque, M. Abdullah, A. Sarwar","doi":"10.18801/ajcsp.010119.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Appropriate agricultural practices have positive and sustainable impacts on rural farmers’ livelihood possessions and strategies to overcome the climate vulnerabilities. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) is a relative measure which is used to determine benefit per unit cost and helps farmers in decision making activities. A study was carried out in the Sirajganj district during 2017, to compare the cost and revenue of Aus, Aman and Boro rice, using benefit cost ratio technique. The Sirajganj district consists of nine upzilas. Ten farmers of each upzila were randomly selected and primary data were personally collected from the respondents through structural questionnaire. The data about Aus, Aman and Boro rice and their cost as well as returns were collected in farmers’ field. The collected data were then sorted, scrutinized and analyzed to achieve the goal set for the study. Results revealed that the total cost of production in Aus rice varied 40856-71353 Tk./ha, gross returns 90651-123889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87 – 15.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.61-2.22. The total cost of Aman (Local) rice varied 43031-69067 Tk./ha, gross returns 57651-86889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 14.98 21.40 Tk./kg and BCR 1.25-1.65. The total cost of Aman (HYV) rice varied 66111-78724 Tk./ha, gross returns 123321-164439 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87-14.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.70-2.22. The total cost of Boro (HYV) rice varied 89129-96886 Tk./ha, gross returns 164439208956 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.31-13.84 Tk./kg and BCR 1.90-2.31. The total cost of Boro (Hybrid) rice varied 92868-99684 Tk./ha, gross returns 205524-226083 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production 8.99-10.74 Tk./kg and BCR 2.10-2.36. Aus/Aman rice cultivation is eco-friendly i.e., needs less ground water, lower risk of early floods and hailstorms, etc.","PeriodicalId":186401,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district\",\"authors\":\"S. Chanda, M. A. Ali, M. Haque, M. Abdullah, A. Sarwar\",\"doi\":\"10.18801/ajcsp.010119.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Appropriate agricultural practices have positive and sustainable impacts on rural farmers’ livelihood possessions and strategies to overcome the climate vulnerabilities. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) is a relative measure which is used to determine benefit per unit cost and helps farmers in decision making activities. A study was carried out in the Sirajganj district during 2017, to compare the cost and revenue of Aus, Aman and Boro rice, using benefit cost ratio technique. The Sirajganj district consists of nine upzilas. Ten farmers of each upzila were randomly selected and primary data were personally collected from the respondents through structural questionnaire. The data about Aus, Aman and Boro rice and their cost as well as returns were collected in farmers’ field. The collected data were then sorted, scrutinized and analyzed to achieve the goal set for the study. Results revealed that the total cost of production in Aus rice varied 40856-71353 Tk./ha, gross returns 90651-123889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87 – 15.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.61-2.22. The total cost of Aman (Local) rice varied 43031-69067 Tk./ha, gross returns 57651-86889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 14.98 21.40 Tk./kg and BCR 1.25-1.65. The total cost of Aman (HYV) rice varied 66111-78724 Tk./ha, gross returns 123321-164439 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87-14.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.70-2.22. The total cost of Boro (HYV) rice varied 89129-96886 Tk./ha, gross returns 164439208956 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.31-13.84 Tk./kg and BCR 1.90-2.31. The total cost of Boro (Hybrid) rice varied 92868-99684 Tk./ha, gross returns 205524-226083 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production 8.99-10.74 Tk./kg and BCR 2.10-2.36. Aus/Aman rice cultivation is eco-friendly i.e., needs less ground water, lower risk of early floods and hailstorms, etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18801/ajcsp.010119.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18801/ajcsp.010119.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

适当的农业实践对农村农民的生计财产和克服气候脆弱性的战略具有积极和可持续的影响。效益成本比(BCR)是一种确定单位成本效益的相对值,可以帮助农民进行决策活动。2017年在Sirajganj地区进行了一项研究,使用效益成本比技术比较了Aus, Aman和Boro大米的成本和收入。Sirajganj区由9个乌齐拉组成。随机抽取每个乌齐拉10名农民,通过结构性问卷的方式从被调查者中亲自收集原始数据。在农民田间收集Aus、Aman和Boro水稻及其成本和收益的数据。然后对收集到的数据进行分类,仔细检查和分析,以实现为研究设定的目标。结果表明,水稻的总生产成本为40856 ~ 71353 Tk。/公顷,总收益90651-123889美元。每公斤水稻生产成本为9.87 ~ 15.45塔卡/公顷。BCR为1.61 ~ 2.22。阿曼(本地)大米的总成本为43031-69067 Tk。/公顷,总收益57651-86889美元。每公顷,每公斤稻米生产成本为14.98 21.40塔卡。BCR 1.25 ~ 1.65。Aman (HYV)水稻的总成本为66111 ~ 78724 Tk。/ha,总收益123321-164439 Tk。每公斤水稻生产成本为9.87 ~ 14.45塔卡/公顷。BCR为1.70 ~ 2.22。Boro (HYV)水稻的总成本为89129 ~ 96886 Tk。/ha,总收益164439208956 Tk。/公顷,每公斤稻米生产成本为9.31-13.84塔卡。BCR为1.90-2.31。杂交水稻的总成本为92868 ~ 99684 Tk。/公顷,总收益205524-226083美元。/公顷,每公斤稻米生产成本8.99-10.74塔卡。BCR为2.10 ~ 2.36。澳大利亚/阿曼水稻种植是生态友好型的,即需要较少的地下水,早期洪水和冰雹的风险较低等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district
Appropriate agricultural practices have positive and sustainable impacts on rural farmers’ livelihood possessions and strategies to overcome the climate vulnerabilities. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) is a relative measure which is used to determine benefit per unit cost and helps farmers in decision making activities. A study was carried out in the Sirajganj district during 2017, to compare the cost and revenue of Aus, Aman and Boro rice, using benefit cost ratio technique. The Sirajganj district consists of nine upzilas. Ten farmers of each upzila were randomly selected and primary data were personally collected from the respondents through structural questionnaire. The data about Aus, Aman and Boro rice and their cost as well as returns were collected in farmers’ field. The collected data were then sorted, scrutinized and analyzed to achieve the goal set for the study. Results revealed that the total cost of production in Aus rice varied 40856-71353 Tk./ha, gross returns 90651-123889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87 – 15.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.61-2.22. The total cost of Aman (Local) rice varied 43031-69067 Tk./ha, gross returns 57651-86889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 14.98 21.40 Tk./kg and BCR 1.25-1.65. The total cost of Aman (HYV) rice varied 66111-78724 Tk./ha, gross returns 123321-164439 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87-14.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.70-2.22. The total cost of Boro (HYV) rice varied 89129-96886 Tk./ha, gross returns 164439208956 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.31-13.84 Tk./kg and BCR 1.90-2.31. The total cost of Boro (Hybrid) rice varied 92868-99684 Tk./ha, gross returns 205524-226083 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production 8.99-10.74 Tk./kg and BCR 2.10-2.36. Aus/Aman rice cultivation is eco-friendly i.e., needs less ground water, lower risk of early floods and hailstorms, etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study on the effects of six pesticides on soil bacteria in laboratory Improvement of yield of salt tolerant rice genotypes/varieties through gypsum application Effects of seedling age and potassium fertilizer on growth and yield of summer onion Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district Potassium and Weed Control Methods affected on Yield of Mungbean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1