{"title":"蒙古札玛尔矿区土壤细菌多样性","authors":"Damdinsuren Narantuya, Choidash Battsetseg, Sodbaatar Naranjargal","doi":"10.5564/pib.v38i1.2542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bacterial diversity of the sample BM from the non-interacted mining area was significantly abundant compared to mining interacted samples. Nine phyla were dominant in the bacterial community structure. But in samples from the mining operation area sample VBKB-b and abandoned mining sample are VBKB-b, 3 phyla Firmicutes (59-66%), Actinobacteria (17.4-26.8%), Proteobacteria (11-14%) were dominant in the bacterial community.","PeriodicalId":186137,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institute of Biology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil bacterial diversity in the Zaamar mining area, Mongolia\",\"authors\":\"Damdinsuren Narantuya, Choidash Battsetseg, Sodbaatar Naranjargal\",\"doi\":\"10.5564/pib.v38i1.2542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The bacterial diversity of the sample BM from the non-interacted mining area was significantly abundant compared to mining interacted samples. Nine phyla were dominant in the bacterial community structure. But in samples from the mining operation area sample VBKB-b and abandoned mining sample are VBKB-b, 3 phyla Firmicutes (59-66%), Actinobacteria (17.4-26.8%), Proteobacteria (11-14%) were dominant in the bacterial community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institute of Biology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institute of Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5564/pib.v38i1.2542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institute of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5564/pib.v38i1.2542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Soil bacterial diversity in the Zaamar mining area, Mongolia
The bacterial diversity of the sample BM from the non-interacted mining area was significantly abundant compared to mining interacted samples. Nine phyla were dominant in the bacterial community structure. But in samples from the mining operation area sample VBKB-b and abandoned mining sample are VBKB-b, 3 phyla Firmicutes (59-66%), Actinobacteria (17.4-26.8%), Proteobacteria (11-14%) were dominant in the bacterial community.