跨主题跨体裁文献写作风格特征的作者身份鉴定实证评价

Simisani Ndaba, E. Thuma, G. Mosweunyane
{"title":"跨主题跨体裁文献写作风格特征的作者身份鉴定实证评价","authors":"Simisani Ndaba, E. Thuma, G. Mosweunyane","doi":"10.5121/ijaia.2023.14101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, an investigation was done to identify writing style features that can be used for cross-topic and cross-genre documents in the Authorship Identification task from 2003 to 2015. Different writing style features were empirically evaluated that were previously used in single topic and single genre documents for Authorship Identification to determine whether they can be used effectively for cross-topic and crossgenre Authorship Identification using an ablation process. The dataset used was taken from the 2015 PAN CLEF Forum English collection consisting of 100 sets. Furthermore, it was investigated whether combining some of these feature sets can help improve the authorship identification task. Three different classifiers were used: Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest. The results suggest that a combination of a lexical, syntactical, structural, and content feature set can be used effectively for cross topic and cross genre authorship identification, as it achieved an AUC result of 0.837.","PeriodicalId":391502,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Authorship Identification Empirical Evaluation of Writing Style Features in Cross-Topic and Cross-genre Documents\",\"authors\":\"Simisani Ndaba, E. Thuma, G. Mosweunyane\",\"doi\":\"10.5121/ijaia.2023.14101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, an investigation was done to identify writing style features that can be used for cross-topic and cross-genre documents in the Authorship Identification task from 2003 to 2015. Different writing style features were empirically evaluated that were previously used in single topic and single genre documents for Authorship Identification to determine whether they can be used effectively for cross-topic and crossgenre Authorship Identification using an ablation process. The dataset used was taken from the 2015 PAN CLEF Forum English collection consisting of 100 sets. Furthermore, it was investigated whether combining some of these feature sets can help improve the authorship identification task. Three different classifiers were used: Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest. The results suggest that a combination of a lexical, syntactical, structural, and content feature set can be used effectively for cross topic and cross genre authorship identification, as it achieved an AUC result of 0.837.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5121/ijaia.2023.14101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5121/ijaia.2023.14101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对2003 - 2015年作者身份识别任务中可用于跨主题和跨体裁文件的写作风格特征进行了调查。本文对以往用于作者身份识别的单一主题和单一体裁文献的不同写作风格特征进行了实证评估,以确定它们是否可以通过消融过程有效地用于跨主题和跨体裁的作者身份识别。使用的数据集来自2015年PAN CLEF论坛英语集,共100组。此外,还研究了结合这些特征集是否有助于改进作者身份识别任务。使用了三种不同的分类器:Naïve贝叶斯,支持向量机和随机森林。结果表明,结合词法、句法、结构和内容特征集可以有效地用于跨主题、跨体裁作者身份识别,AUC结果为0.837。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Authorship Identification Empirical Evaluation of Writing Style Features in Cross-Topic and Cross-genre Documents
In this paper, an investigation was done to identify writing style features that can be used for cross-topic and cross-genre documents in the Authorship Identification task from 2003 to 2015. Different writing style features were empirically evaluated that were previously used in single topic and single genre documents for Authorship Identification to determine whether they can be used effectively for cross-topic and crossgenre Authorship Identification using an ablation process. The dataset used was taken from the 2015 PAN CLEF Forum English collection consisting of 100 sets. Furthermore, it was investigated whether combining some of these feature sets can help improve the authorship identification task. Three different classifiers were used: Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest. The results suggest that a combination of a lexical, syntactical, structural, and content feature set can be used effectively for cross topic and cross genre authorship identification, as it achieved an AUC result of 0.837.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Passive Sonar Detection and Classification Based on Demon-Lofar Analysis and Neural Network Algorithms Ensemble Learning Approach for Digital Communication Modulation’s Classification Imbalanced Dataset Effect on CNN-Based Classifier Performance for Face Recognition Foundations of ANNs: Tolstoy’s Genius Explored using Transformer Architecture Review of AI Maturity Models in Automotive SME Manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1