金融科技、普惠金融与家庭投资组合选择:来自中国家庭金融调查的证据

Lihui Tian, Hanyu Zheng, Dekai Tan
{"title":"金融科技、普惠金融与家庭投资组合选择:来自中国家庭金融调查的证据","authors":"Lihui Tian, Hanyu Zheng, Dekai Tan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3909717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the China Household Finance Survey in 2017, using different measurements of FinTech, this paper finds that FinTech can promote the ratio of household risky asset holdings significantly. However, this positive effect is not financially inclusive, since it is more obvious among urban households, high-income households and households headed by younger. In terms of mechanism analysis, this paper finds that FinTech increases the ratio of household risky asset holdings through three ways: improving financial literacy, lowering the investment threshold, and promoting social interaction. Further, this paper finds that the reason why FinTech is not financial inclusive is that rural households, low-income households, and households headed by older are not good at using FinTech to improve financial literacy and lower their investment threshold. Our conclusion is still robust after using the average residential electricity consumption as the instrumental variable. This paper enriches the research on household portfolio choice and provides policy suggestions for the future promotion of financial inclusion with FinTech.","PeriodicalId":428959,"journal":{"name":"Household Finance eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FinTech, Financial Inclusion, and Household Portfolio Choice: Evidence from China Household Finance Survey\",\"authors\":\"Lihui Tian, Hanyu Zheng, Dekai Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3909717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the China Household Finance Survey in 2017, using different measurements of FinTech, this paper finds that FinTech can promote the ratio of household risky asset holdings significantly. However, this positive effect is not financially inclusive, since it is more obvious among urban households, high-income households and households headed by younger. In terms of mechanism analysis, this paper finds that FinTech increases the ratio of household risky asset holdings through three ways: improving financial literacy, lowering the investment threshold, and promoting social interaction. Further, this paper finds that the reason why FinTech is not financial inclusive is that rural households, low-income households, and households headed by older are not good at using FinTech to improve financial literacy and lower their investment threshold. Our conclusion is still robust after using the average residential electricity consumption as the instrumental variable. This paper enriches the research on household portfolio choice and provides policy suggestions for the future promotion of financial inclusion with FinTech.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Household Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Household Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3909717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Household Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3909717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于2017年《中国家庭金融调查》,采用不同的金融科技测度,本文发现金融科技可以显著提升家庭风险资产持有比例。然而,这种积极影响在经济上并不具有包容性,因为在城市家庭、高收入家庭和年轻户主家庭中更为明显。在机制分析方面,本文发现金融科技通过提高金融素养、降低投资门槛和促进社会互动三种途径提高家庭风险资产持有比例。进一步,本文发现FinTech不具有金融普惠性的原因在于农村家庭、低收入家庭和户主年龄较大的家庭不善于利用FinTech提高金融素养和降低投资门槛。将居民平均用电量作为工具变量后,我们的结论仍然是稳健的。本文丰富了家庭投资组合选择的研究内容,并为未来利用金融科技促进普惠金融提供政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FinTech, Financial Inclusion, and Household Portfolio Choice: Evidence from China Household Finance Survey
Based on the China Household Finance Survey in 2017, using different measurements of FinTech, this paper finds that FinTech can promote the ratio of household risky asset holdings significantly. However, this positive effect is not financially inclusive, since it is more obvious among urban households, high-income households and households headed by younger. In terms of mechanism analysis, this paper finds that FinTech increases the ratio of household risky asset holdings through three ways: improving financial literacy, lowering the investment threshold, and promoting social interaction. Further, this paper finds that the reason why FinTech is not financial inclusive is that rural households, low-income households, and households headed by older are not good at using FinTech to improve financial literacy and lower their investment threshold. Our conclusion is still robust after using the average residential electricity consumption as the instrumental variable. This paper enriches the research on household portfolio choice and provides policy suggestions for the future promotion of financial inclusion with FinTech.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial Expectations and Household Consumption: Does Middle Inflation Matter? Dynamic Incentives in Retirement Earnings-Replacement Benefits Consumers and Guaranteed Asset Protection (“GAP Protection”) on Vehicle Loans and Sales-Financing Contracts: A First Look Redtape, Greenleaf: Creditor Behavior Under Costly Collateral Enforcement Benchmarking Forecast Approaches for Mortgage Credit Risk for Forward Periods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1