哲学和法律话语中的术语互动“侵略性-侵略性”

Khrystyna Maksym
{"title":"哲学和法律话语中的术语互动“侵略性-侵略性”","authors":"Khrystyna Maksym","doi":"10.23939/law2023.37.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article conceptualizes the essence of aggression as a philosophical and legal phenomenon and reveals the specifics of the terminological interaction \"aggression-aggressiveness\". The distinction between the concepts of \"aggression\" and \"aggressiveness\" indicates that, on the one hand, not all aggressive actions of the subject are actually based on the aggressiveness of the person as a trait, on the other hand, the aggressiveness of a person does not always manifest itself in clearly aggressive actions. Manifestation or non-manifestation of aggressiveness as a personal trait in certain acts of behavior is always the result of a complex interaction of transsituational and situational factors. It turns out that aggression is organically connected with violence and is its natural basis, just as for human society - social matter, the basis is the natural environment, in particular, living matter, in which aggression is a mandatory attribute, but aggression as a phenomenon is not identical to violence, as living matter and social matter are not identical. It is noted that there are many scientific definitions for the category of \"aggression\", however, researchers often confuse the concepts of \"aggression\" and \"aggressiveness\" (that is, a form of behavior and a personal trait), others are too narrow and do not cover all types and forms of aggressive behavior ( direct and indirect aggression, physical and verbal, active and passive, hostile and instrumental, rational and affective, direct and displaced, constructive and destructive, proactive and reactive, socialized and antisocial, etc.), the third, on the contrary, are too broad and include such actions , which are mostly not considered as aggression. It is concluded that aggression is actions that cause damage or lead to the destruction of animate or inanimate object; direct or indirect use of armed force, attack. Aggressiveness is a relatively stable personality trait, the subject's readiness for aggressive behavior.","PeriodicalId":421282,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The terminological interaction «aggression-aggressiveness» in the philosophical and legal discourse\",\"authors\":\"Khrystyna Maksym\",\"doi\":\"10.23939/law2023.37.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article conceptualizes the essence of aggression as a philosophical and legal phenomenon and reveals the specifics of the terminological interaction \\\"aggression-aggressiveness\\\". The distinction between the concepts of \\\"aggression\\\" and \\\"aggressiveness\\\" indicates that, on the one hand, not all aggressive actions of the subject are actually based on the aggressiveness of the person as a trait, on the other hand, the aggressiveness of a person does not always manifest itself in clearly aggressive actions. Manifestation or non-manifestation of aggressiveness as a personal trait in certain acts of behavior is always the result of a complex interaction of transsituational and situational factors. It turns out that aggression is organically connected with violence and is its natural basis, just as for human society - social matter, the basis is the natural environment, in particular, living matter, in which aggression is a mandatory attribute, but aggression as a phenomenon is not identical to violence, as living matter and social matter are not identical. It is noted that there are many scientific definitions for the category of \\\"aggression\\\", however, researchers often confuse the concepts of \\\"aggression\\\" and \\\"aggressiveness\\\" (that is, a form of behavior and a personal trait), others are too narrow and do not cover all types and forms of aggressive behavior ( direct and indirect aggression, physical and verbal, active and passive, hostile and instrumental, rational and affective, direct and displaced, constructive and destructive, proactive and reactive, socialized and antisocial, etc.), the third, on the contrary, are too broad and include such actions , which are mostly not considered as aggression. It is concluded that aggression is actions that cause damage or lead to the destruction of animate or inanimate object; direct or indirect use of armed force, attack. Aggressiveness is a relatively stable personality trait, the subject's readiness for aggressive behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.37.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.37.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对侵略作为一种哲学和法律现象的本质进行了概念化,并揭示了“侵略-侵略”这一术语互动的具体特征。“攻击性”与“攻击性”概念的区别表明,一方面,并非所有主体的攻击性行为实际上都是以人的攻击性为特征的,另一方面,人的攻击性并不总是以明确的攻击性行为表现出来。攻击性作为一种个人特征在某些行为中的表现或不表现总是跨情境和情境因素复杂相互作用的结果。事实证明,攻击性与暴力是有机联系的,是暴力的自然基础,正如人类社会——社会物质,其基础是自然环境,特别是生物物质,攻击性是生物物质的强制性属性,但攻击性作为一种现象并不等同于暴力,生物物质与社会物质并不等同。需要指出的是,关于“攻击”这一范畴的科学定义有很多,但研究者经常混淆“攻击”和“攻击性”的概念(即一种行为形式和一种个人特征),其他的定义过于狭隘,没有涵盖所有类型和形式的攻击行为(直接和间接攻击、肢体和言语、主动和被动、敌对和工具、理性和情感、直接和转移、建设性和破坏性、主动的和被动的,社会化的和反社会的等),第三种,相反,太宽泛了,包括了这些行为,这些行为大多不被认为是侵略。得出的结论是,侵略是造成损害或导致有生命或无生命物体毁灭的行为;直接或间接使用武力,攻击。攻击性是一种相对稳定的人格特质,是被试对攻击行为的准备程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The terminological interaction «aggression-aggressiveness» in the philosophical and legal discourse
The article conceptualizes the essence of aggression as a philosophical and legal phenomenon and reveals the specifics of the terminological interaction "aggression-aggressiveness". The distinction between the concepts of "aggression" and "aggressiveness" indicates that, on the one hand, not all aggressive actions of the subject are actually based on the aggressiveness of the person as a trait, on the other hand, the aggressiveness of a person does not always manifest itself in clearly aggressive actions. Manifestation or non-manifestation of aggressiveness as a personal trait in certain acts of behavior is always the result of a complex interaction of transsituational and situational factors. It turns out that aggression is organically connected with violence and is its natural basis, just as for human society - social matter, the basis is the natural environment, in particular, living matter, in which aggression is a mandatory attribute, but aggression as a phenomenon is not identical to violence, as living matter and social matter are not identical. It is noted that there are many scientific definitions for the category of "aggression", however, researchers often confuse the concepts of "aggression" and "aggressiveness" (that is, a form of behavior and a personal trait), others are too narrow and do not cover all types and forms of aggressive behavior ( direct and indirect aggression, physical and verbal, active and passive, hostile and instrumental, rational and affective, direct and displaced, constructive and destructive, proactive and reactive, socialized and antisocial, etc.), the third, on the contrary, are too broad and include such actions , which are mostly not considered as aggression. It is concluded that aggression is actions that cause damage or lead to the destruction of animate or inanimate object; direct or indirect use of armed force, attack. Aggressiveness is a relatively stable personality trait, the subject's readiness for aggressive behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Canonical pedagogy in metaphysical law Peculiarities of the introduction of the joint transit procedure in Ukraine Cyber security of the banking sector of Ukraine: concepts, problems and experience of foreign countries Measures to ensure the institutional independence of the judiciary The role of higher government bodies in European integration processes of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1