重定向图像的质量评估:综述

Maryam Karimi, Erfan Entezami
{"title":"重定向图像的质量评估:综述","authors":"Maryam Karimi, Erfan Entezami","doi":"10.1109/MVIP49855.2020.9116899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transmission, saving and many processing methods cause different damage in images. Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is necessary to benchmark processing algorithms, to optimize them, and to monitor the quality of images in quality control systems. Traditional quality metrics have low correlations with subjective perception. The key problem is to evaluate the distorted images as human do. Subjective quality assessment is more reliable but is cumbersome and time-consuming, so it is impossible to embed it in online applications. Therefore, many objective perceptual IQA models have been developed until now. Content-aware retargeting methods aim to adapt source images to target display devices with different sizes and aspect ratios so that salient areas will be less distorted. The size mismatch and the completely different distortions caused by retargeting have made common IQA methods useless in this area. Therefore, retargeted Image Quality Assessment (RIQA) methods are designed for this purpose. The quality of retargeted images is different depending to image content and retargeting algorithm. This paper provides a literature review and a new categorization of the current subjective and objective retargeted image quality measures. Also, we intend to compare and analyze the performance of these measures. It is demonstrated that the performance of RIQA methods can be further improved by using high-level descriptors in addition to low-level ones.","PeriodicalId":255375,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing (MVIP)","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Assessment for Retargeted Images: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Karimi, Erfan Entezami\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MVIP49855.2020.9116899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transmission, saving and many processing methods cause different damage in images. Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is necessary to benchmark processing algorithms, to optimize them, and to monitor the quality of images in quality control systems. Traditional quality metrics have low correlations with subjective perception. The key problem is to evaluate the distorted images as human do. Subjective quality assessment is more reliable but is cumbersome and time-consuming, so it is impossible to embed it in online applications. Therefore, many objective perceptual IQA models have been developed until now. Content-aware retargeting methods aim to adapt source images to target display devices with different sizes and aspect ratios so that salient areas will be less distorted. The size mismatch and the completely different distortions caused by retargeting have made common IQA methods useless in this area. Therefore, retargeted Image Quality Assessment (RIQA) methods are designed for this purpose. The quality of retargeted images is different depending to image content and retargeting algorithm. This paper provides a literature review and a new categorization of the current subjective and objective retargeted image quality measures. Also, we intend to compare and analyze the performance of these measures. It is demonstrated that the performance of RIQA methods can be further improved by using high-level descriptors in addition to low-level ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing (MVIP)\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing (MVIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MVIP49855.2020.9116899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing (MVIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MVIP49855.2020.9116899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

传输、保存和许多处理方法都会对图像造成不同程度的损害。在质量控制系统中,图像质量评估(IQA)是对处理算法进行基准测试、优化和监控图像质量的必要手段。传统的质量指标与主观感知的相关性较低。关键问题是如何像人一样对失真图像进行评估。主观质量评估更可靠,但繁琐且耗时,因此无法将其嵌入在线应用程序。因此,到目前为止,已经开发了许多客观的感知IQA模型。内容感知重定向方法旨在使源图像适应具有不同尺寸和宽高比的目标显示设备,从而减少显著区域的失真。由于重定向引起的大小不匹配和完全不同的扭曲,使得常见的IQA方法在这一领域毫无用处。因此,重定向图像质量评估(RIQA)方法是为此目的而设计的。根据图像内容和重定向算法的不同,重定向图像的质量也不同。本文对现有的主观和客观重定向图像质量测量方法进行了综述和分类。此外,我们打算比较和分析这些措施的表现。结果表明,除了使用低级描述符外,还使用高级描述符可以进一步提高RIQA方法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality Assessment for Retargeted Images: A Review
Transmission, saving and many processing methods cause different damage in images. Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is necessary to benchmark processing algorithms, to optimize them, and to monitor the quality of images in quality control systems. Traditional quality metrics have low correlations with subjective perception. The key problem is to evaluate the distorted images as human do. Subjective quality assessment is more reliable but is cumbersome and time-consuming, so it is impossible to embed it in online applications. Therefore, many objective perceptual IQA models have been developed until now. Content-aware retargeting methods aim to adapt source images to target display devices with different sizes and aspect ratios so that salient areas will be less distorted. The size mismatch and the completely different distortions caused by retargeting have made common IQA methods useless in this area. Therefore, retargeted Image Quality Assessment (RIQA) methods are designed for this purpose. The quality of retargeted images is different depending to image content and retargeting algorithm. This paper provides a literature review and a new categorization of the current subjective and objective retargeted image quality measures. Also, we intend to compare and analyze the performance of these measures. It is demonstrated that the performance of RIQA methods can be further improved by using high-level descriptors in addition to low-level ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Offline Handwritten Signature Verification and Recognition Based on Deep Transfer Learning A High-Accuracy, Cost-Effective People Counting Solution Based on Visual Depth Data Source Camera Identification Using WLBP Descriptor Convolutional Neural Network for Building Extraction from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images PCB Defect Detection Using Denoising Convolutional Autoencoders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1