随机匹配滤波器在跟踪多个抹香鲸方面优于Teager-Kaiser-Mallat

F. Caudal, H. Glotin
{"title":"随机匹配滤波器在跟踪多个抹香鲸方面优于Teager-Kaiser-Mallat","authors":"F. Caudal, H. Glotin","doi":"10.1109/PASSIVE.2008.4786976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compare two real-time passive underwater acoustic methods to track multiple emitting whales using four or more omni-directional widely-spaced bottom-mounted hydrophones. The Stochastic Matched Filter (SMF) is first used in the whale tracking. The SMF with an echo removal is compared to the Teager-Kaiser-Mallat (TKM) filter method. We briefly review the SMF and TKM theory, rough time delays of arrival are calculated, selected and filtered, and used to estimate the positions of whales for a constant or linear sound speed profile. The complete algorithm is tested on real data from the NUWC and the AUTEC. We evaluate the a priori performance of the system via the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) and Monte Carlo simulations. The CRLB and Monte Carlo simulations are computed and compared with the tracking results. SMF shows higher performance than TKM with more position estimated. Results is validated by similar results from the US Navy and Hawaii univ labs in the case of one whale, and by similar whales counting from the Columbia univ. ROSA lab in the case of multiple whales. The model is validated with good performances with the theoric CRLB and the computed confidence ellipses. At this time, our tracking method is the only one giving typical speed and depth estimations for multiple (4) emitting whales located at 1 to 5 km from the hydrophones.","PeriodicalId":153349,"journal":{"name":"2008 New Trends for Environmental Monitoring Using Passive Systems","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stochastic Matched Filter outperforms Teager-Kaiser-Mallat for tracking a plurality of sperm whales\",\"authors\":\"F. Caudal, H. Glotin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PASSIVE.2008.4786976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compare two real-time passive underwater acoustic methods to track multiple emitting whales using four or more omni-directional widely-spaced bottom-mounted hydrophones. The Stochastic Matched Filter (SMF) is first used in the whale tracking. The SMF with an echo removal is compared to the Teager-Kaiser-Mallat (TKM) filter method. We briefly review the SMF and TKM theory, rough time delays of arrival are calculated, selected and filtered, and used to estimate the positions of whales for a constant or linear sound speed profile. The complete algorithm is tested on real data from the NUWC and the AUTEC. We evaluate the a priori performance of the system via the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) and Monte Carlo simulations. The CRLB and Monte Carlo simulations are computed and compared with the tracking results. SMF shows higher performance than TKM with more position estimated. Results is validated by similar results from the US Navy and Hawaii univ labs in the case of one whale, and by similar whales counting from the Columbia univ. ROSA lab in the case of multiple whales. The model is validated with good performances with the theoric CRLB and the computed confidence ellipses. At this time, our tracking method is the only one giving typical speed and depth estimations for multiple (4) emitting whales located at 1 to 5 km from the hydrophones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 New Trends for Environmental Monitoring Using Passive Systems\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 New Trends for Environmental Monitoring Using Passive Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSIVE.2008.4786976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 New Trends for Environmental Monitoring Using Passive Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSIVE.2008.4786976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文比较了两种实时被动水声方法,利用四个或更多的全向宽间距底置水听器跟踪多发射鲸鱼。随机匹配滤波器(SMF)首次用于鲸鱼跟踪。将带回波去除的SMF与Teager-Kaiser-Mallat (TKM)滤波方法进行了比较。我们简要回顾了SMF和TKM理论,计算、选择和过滤了粗略的到达时间延迟,并用于估计恒定或线性声速剖面下鲸鱼的位置。完整的算法在NUWC和AUTEC的实际数据上进行了测试。我们通过Cramer-Rao下界(CRLB)和蒙特卡罗模拟来评估系统的先验性能。对CRLB和蒙特卡罗仿真进行了计算,并与跟踪结果进行了比较。SMF在位置估计较多的情况下表现出比TKM更高的性能。美国海军和夏威夷大学实验室对一头鲸鱼的类似结果,以及哥伦比亚大学罗莎实验室对多头鲸鱼的类似计数,都证实了这些结果。通过理论CRLB和计算置信椭圆验证了该模型具有良好的性能。目前,我们的跟踪方法是唯一一种给出距离水听器1至5公里处多(4)只发射鲸鱼的典型速度和深度估计的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stochastic Matched Filter outperforms Teager-Kaiser-Mallat for tracking a plurality of sperm whales
This paper compare two real-time passive underwater acoustic methods to track multiple emitting whales using four or more omni-directional widely-spaced bottom-mounted hydrophones. The Stochastic Matched Filter (SMF) is first used in the whale tracking. The SMF with an echo removal is compared to the Teager-Kaiser-Mallat (TKM) filter method. We briefly review the SMF and TKM theory, rough time delays of arrival are calculated, selected and filtered, and used to estimate the positions of whales for a constant or linear sound speed profile. The complete algorithm is tested on real data from the NUWC and the AUTEC. We evaluate the a priori performance of the system via the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) and Monte Carlo simulations. The CRLB and Monte Carlo simulations are computed and compared with the tracking results. SMF shows higher performance than TKM with more position estimated. Results is validated by similar results from the US Navy and Hawaii univ labs in the case of one whale, and by similar whales counting from the Columbia univ. ROSA lab in the case of multiple whales. The model is validated with good performances with the theoric CRLB and the computed confidence ellipses. At this time, our tracking method is the only one giving typical speed and depth estimations for multiple (4) emitting whales located at 1 to 5 km from the hydrophones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GPS ISAR passive system characterization using Point Spread Function A comparison of interpolation processes: Applications to across-track scanning radiometers Acoustic detection of ice cracking events FFT-based sonar array beamforming without corner turning Flood-fill algorithms used for passive acoustic detection and tracking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1