{"title":"形式与实质之间","authors":"A. Robertson, James Goudkamp","doi":"10.5040/9781509929481.ch-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":", Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Th eory, and Legal Institutions ( Oxford , Clarendon Press , 1987 ) . 2 D Kennedy , ‘ Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication ’ ( 1976 ) 89 Harvard Law Review 1685 . 3 K Barker, ‘ Form and Substance: Th ree Observations on the State of Debate ’, this volume, ch 18 , text accompanying nn 5 – 9, identifi es no fewer than 13 diff erent kinds of distinction between form and substance. 1","PeriodicalId":387790,"journal":{"name":"Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Form and Substance\",\"authors\":\"A. Robertson, James Goudkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781509929481.ch-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\", Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Th eory, and Legal Institutions ( Oxford , Clarendon Press , 1987 ) . 2 D Kennedy , ‘ Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication ’ ( 1976 ) 89 Harvard Law Review 1685 . 3 K Barker, ‘ Form and Substance: Th ree Observations on the State of Debate ’, this volume, ch 18 , text accompanying nn 5 – 9, identifi es no fewer than 13 diff erent kinds of distinction between form and substance. 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":387790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509929481.ch-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509929481.ch-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
《英美法律的形式与实质:法律推理、法律理论和法律制度的比较研究》(牛津,克拉伦登出版社,1987年)。D Kennedy,“私法裁决的形式和实质”(1976)89《哈佛法律评论》1685年。3 K Barker,“形式与实质:对辩论状态的三种看法”,本卷,第18章,附于第5 - 9条的文本,确定了形式与实质之间不少于13种不同的区别。1
, Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Th eory, and Legal Institutions ( Oxford , Clarendon Press , 1987 ) . 2 D Kennedy , ‘ Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication ’ ( 1976 ) 89 Harvard Law Review 1685 . 3 K Barker, ‘ Form and Substance: Th ree Observations on the State of Debate ’, this volume, ch 18 , text accompanying nn 5 – 9, identifi es no fewer than 13 diff erent kinds of distinction between form and substance. 1