形式与实质之间

A. Robertson, James Goudkamp
{"title":"形式与实质之间","authors":"A. Robertson, James Goudkamp","doi":"10.5040/9781509929481.ch-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":", Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Th eory, and Legal Institutions ( Oxford , Clarendon Press , 1987 ) . 2 D Kennedy , ‘ Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication ’ ( 1976 ) 89 Harvard Law Review 1685 . 3 K Barker, ‘ Form and Substance: Th ree Observations on the State of Debate ’, this volume, ch 18 , text accompanying nn 5 – 9, identifi es no fewer than 13 diff erent kinds of distinction between form and substance. 1","PeriodicalId":387790,"journal":{"name":"Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Form and Substance\",\"authors\":\"A. Robertson, James Goudkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781509929481.ch-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\", Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Th eory, and Legal Institutions ( Oxford , Clarendon Press , 1987 ) . 2 D Kennedy , ‘ Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication ’ ( 1976 ) 89 Harvard Law Review 1685 . 3 K Barker, ‘ Form and Substance: Th ree Observations on the State of Debate ’, this volume, ch 18 , text accompanying nn 5 – 9, identifi es no fewer than 13 diff erent kinds of distinction between form and substance. 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":387790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509929481.ch-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Form and Substance in the Law of Obligations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509929481.ch-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《英美法律的形式与实质:法律推理、法律理论和法律制度的比较研究》(牛津,克拉伦登出版社,1987年)。D Kennedy,“私法裁决的形式和实质”(1976)89《哈佛法律评论》1685年。3 K Barker,“形式与实质:对辩论状态的三种看法”,本卷,第18章,附于第5 - 9条的文本,确定了形式与实质之间不少于13种不同的区别。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Between Form and Substance
, Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Th eory, and Legal Institutions ( Oxford , Clarendon Press , 1987 ) . 2 D Kennedy , ‘ Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication ’ ( 1976 ) 89 Harvard Law Review 1685 . 3 K Barker, ‘ Form and Substance: Th ree Observations on the State of Debate ’, this volume, ch 18 , text accompanying nn 5 – 9, identifi es no fewer than 13 diff erent kinds of distinction between form and substance. 1
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misrepresentation, Misleading Conduct and Statute through the Lens of Form and Substance Two Forms of Formalism Form and Substance in Equity Statute Law in the Law of Obligations: Dimensions of Form and Substance ‘Substance Over Form’: Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1