网格环境下移动机器人路径规划快速行军法与A* SEARCH的比较研究:地图分辨率的影响

C. H. Chiang, Po Jui Chiang, J.C.-C. Fei, J. Liu
{"title":"网格环境下移动机器人路径规划快速行军法与A* SEARCH的比较研究:地图分辨率的影响","authors":"C. H. Chiang, Po Jui Chiang, J.C.-C. Fei, J. Liu","doi":"10.1109/ARSO.2007.4531429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretically both of fast marching method (FMM) and A* SEARCH have the same time complexity of O(N log N) , where N is the number of grid points in a map, and guarantee to find an optimal solution if this path exists. This paper examines the effect of alteration of resolution of map on the performance of path planning by A* and FMM on 2D rectangular grid environments. Our observations on the basis of comparative simulations in three test environments at different resolutions are that: A* is more focused and thus faster to generate a polygonal line (continuous but not smooth) path, while FMM generates a better curvature-control, generally smoother and shorter path that is a numerically consistent approximation to the true shortest continuous path as the resolution of map is finer and finer. The difference of path quality for these two methods is more significant as the resolution is finer.","PeriodicalId":344670,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts","volume":"326 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of implementing Fast Marching Method and A* SEARCH for mobile robot path planning in grid environment: Effect of map resolution\",\"authors\":\"C. H. Chiang, Po Jui Chiang, J.C.-C. Fei, J. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARSO.2007.4531429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theoretically both of fast marching method (FMM) and A* SEARCH have the same time complexity of O(N log N) , where N is the number of grid points in a map, and guarantee to find an optimal solution if this path exists. This paper examines the effect of alteration of resolution of map on the performance of path planning by A* and FMM on 2D rectangular grid environments. Our observations on the basis of comparative simulations in three test environments at different resolutions are that: A* is more focused and thus faster to generate a polygonal line (continuous but not smooth) path, while FMM generates a better curvature-control, generally smoother and shorter path that is a numerically consistent approximation to the true shortest continuous path as the resolution of map is finer and finer. The difference of path quality for these two methods is more significant as the resolution is finer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts\",\"volume\":\"326 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2007.4531429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2007.4531429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

从理论上讲,快速行军法(FMM)和A* SEARCH都具有相同的时间复杂度O(N log N),其中N为地图中网格点的个数,并且保证在该路径存在的情况下找到最优解。本文研究了在二维矩形网格环境下,地图分辨率的改变对A*和FMM路径规划性能的影响。在三种不同分辨率的测试环境下对比模拟的基础上,我们的观察结果是:A*更集中,从而更快地生成多边形线(连续但不光滑)路径,而FMM生成的曲率控制更好,通常更平滑,更短的路径,随着地图分辨率越来越精细,它是与真正的最短连续路径的数值一致的近似。两种方法的路径质量差异随着分辨率的增大而增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of implementing Fast Marching Method and A* SEARCH for mobile robot path planning in grid environment: Effect of map resolution
Theoretically both of fast marching method (FMM) and A* SEARCH have the same time complexity of O(N log N) , where N is the number of grid points in a map, and guarantee to find an optimal solution if this path exists. This paper examines the effect of alteration of resolution of map on the performance of path planning by A* and FMM on 2D rectangular grid environments. Our observations on the basis of comparative simulations in three test environments at different resolutions are that: A* is more focused and thus faster to generate a polygonal line (continuous but not smooth) path, while FMM generates a better curvature-control, generally smoother and shorter path that is a numerically consistent approximation to the true shortest continuous path as the resolution of map is finer and finer. The difference of path quality for these two methods is more significant as the resolution is finer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mobile sensor node localization based on sensor fusion using covariance intersection approach Path planning and dynamic simulation of weightlifting robot manipulator Design and application of a new 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator Mobile robot based human detection and tracking using range and intensity data fusion Intelligent battery management system with parallel-connected cell-balance algorithm on the humanoid robot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1