{"title":"严肃的视觉:视觉体验和适应","authors":"R. Evan","doi":"10.5117/9789463722100_CH01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rather than approaching the ‘look’ of adaptation through point of view\n or the ‘vision’ of the adapter, this chapter examines the material, visible\n texture of screen adaptation. Using two adaptations of Bram Stoker’s gothic\n novel Dracula, I analyse how each uses mise en scène, cinematography, and\n editing to thicken and make tangible Stoker’s questioning of the reliability\n of vision in modernity. The first, Nosferatu (F.W Murnau, 1922) employs the\n tricks of early cinema to shock spectators, while the second—Bram Stoker’s\n Dracula (Francis Ford Coppola, 1992)—uses a neo-baroque aesthetic that\n ruptures the screen and engulfs the spectator, much like one of Dracula’s\n victims. This chapter suggests that critical insight into an adaptation\n can be found quite literally in sight, and embraces how the materiality\n of adaptation overlaps with the materiality of vision.","PeriodicalId":253689,"journal":{"name":"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grave Visions: Visual Experience and Adaptation\",\"authors\":\"R. Evan\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789463722100_CH01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rather than approaching the ‘look’ of adaptation through point of view\\n or the ‘vision’ of the adapter, this chapter examines the material, visible\\n texture of screen adaptation. Using two adaptations of Bram Stoker’s gothic\\n novel Dracula, I analyse how each uses mise en scène, cinematography, and\\n editing to thicken and make tangible Stoker’s questioning of the reliability\\n of vision in modernity. The first, Nosferatu (F.W Murnau, 1922) employs the\\n tricks of early cinema to shock spectators, while the second—Bram Stoker’s\\n Dracula (Francis Ford Coppola, 1992)—uses a neo-baroque aesthetic that\\n ruptures the screen and engulfs the spectator, much like one of Dracula’s\\n victims. This chapter suggests that critical insight into an adaptation\\n can be found quite literally in sight, and embraces how the materiality\\n of adaptation overlaps with the materiality of vision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722100_CH01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722100_CH01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本章不是通过改编者的观点或视角来探讨改编的“外观”,而是考察屏幕改编的材料和可见纹理。通过对布拉姆·斯托克的哥特小说《德古拉》的两部改编,我分析了它们是如何运用场景布置、电影技术和剪辑技术,使斯托克对现代性视觉可靠性的质疑变得更加丰富和切实。第一部《诺斯费拉图》(F.W Murnau, 1922)采用了早期电影的技巧来震撼观众,而第二部《德古拉》(bram Stoker, Francis Ford Coppola, 1992)采用了新巴洛克美学,打破了屏幕,吞没了观众,很像德古拉的受害者之一。这一章表明,对适应的批判性洞察可以在视觉中找到,并包含了适应的物质性与视觉的物质性是如何重叠的。
Rather than approaching the ‘look’ of adaptation through point of view
or the ‘vision’ of the adapter, this chapter examines the material, visible
texture of screen adaptation. Using two adaptations of Bram Stoker’s gothic
novel Dracula, I analyse how each uses mise en scène, cinematography, and
editing to thicken and make tangible Stoker’s questioning of the reliability
of vision in modernity. The first, Nosferatu (F.W Murnau, 1922) employs the
tricks of early cinema to shock spectators, while the second—Bram Stoker’s
Dracula (Francis Ford Coppola, 1992)—uses a neo-baroque aesthetic that
ruptures the screen and engulfs the spectator, much like one of Dracula’s
victims. This chapter suggests that critical insight into an adaptation
can be found quite literally in sight, and embraces how the materiality
of adaptation overlaps with the materiality of vision.