执行和回顾当代模块化方法的评估:什么构成了合理的期望?

R. Walker
{"title":"执行和回顾当代模块化方法的评估:什么构成了合理的期望?","authors":"R. Walker","doi":"10.1109/ACOM.2007.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inherent difficulties in assessing contemporary modularization (CoM) approaches are considered. The motivation is provided for a model relating assessment methodologies to the maturity of the CoM approach.","PeriodicalId":377207,"journal":{"name":"First International Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques (ACoM '07)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performing and Reviewing Assessments of Contemporary Modularization Approaches: What Constitutes Reasonable Expectations?\",\"authors\":\"R. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACOM.2007.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The inherent difficulties in assessing contemporary modularization (CoM) approaches are considered. The motivation is provided for a model relating assessment methodologies to the maturity of the CoM approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First International Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques (ACoM '07)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First International Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques (ACoM '07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACOM.2007.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques (ACoM '07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACOM.2007.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑了评估当代模块化(CoM)方法的固有困难。该动机提供了一个将评估方法与CoM方法的成熟度联系起来的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performing and Reviewing Assessments of Contemporary Modularization Approaches: What Constitutes Reasonable Expectations?
The inherent difficulties in assessing contemporary modularization (CoM) approaches are considered. The motivation is provided for a model relating assessment methodologies to the maturity of the CoM approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performing and Reviewing Assessments of Contemporary Modularization Approaches: What Constitutes Reasonable Expectations? An Evolutionary Approach to Software Modularity Analysis Semantic Dependencies and Modularity of Aspect-Oriented Software Using Design Structure Matrices to Assess Modularity in Aspect-Oriented Software Product Lines On the Necessity of Empirical Studies in the Assessment of Modularization Mechanisms for Crosscutting Concerns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1