基准多目标回归方法

Saulo Martiello Mastelini, Everton José Santana, Victor Guilherme Turrisi da Costa, Sylvio Barbon Junior
{"title":"基准多目标回归方法","authors":"Saulo Martiello Mastelini, Everton José Santana, Victor Guilherme Turrisi da Costa, Sylvio Barbon Junior","doi":"10.1109/bracis.2018.00075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning methods for multi-target regression (MTR) rely on the hypothesis that an inter-target correlation can improve predictive performance. In the last years, many MTR methods were developed, but there are still questions about how their performances are influenced by the datasets characteristics such as linearity, number of targets, and inter-correlation complexity. Aiming at contributing to the understanding of the relationship between the dataset properties and MTR methods, we generated 33 synthetic datasets with controlled characteristics and tested their performance with single-target and six MTR methods. The results showed that MTR methods were able to improve performance even in datasets whose targets were not linearly correlated among them, but the predictive improvement differed among the combinations of method/regressor according to the dataset composition.","PeriodicalId":405190,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Multi-target Regression Methods\",\"authors\":\"Saulo Martiello Mastelini, Everton José Santana, Victor Guilherme Turrisi da Costa, Sylvio Barbon Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/bracis.2018.00075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine learning methods for multi-target regression (MTR) rely on the hypothesis that an inter-target correlation can improve predictive performance. In the last years, many MTR methods were developed, but there are still questions about how their performances are influenced by the datasets characteristics such as linearity, number of targets, and inter-correlation complexity. Aiming at contributing to the understanding of the relationship between the dataset properties and MTR methods, we generated 33 synthetic datasets with controlled characteristics and tested their performance with single-target and six MTR methods. The results showed that MTR methods were able to improve performance even in datasets whose targets were not linearly correlated among them, but the predictive improvement differed among the combinations of method/regressor according to the dataset composition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/bracis.2018.00075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/bracis.2018.00075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

多目标回归(MTR)的机器学习方法依赖于目标间相关性可以提高预测性能的假设。近年来,人们开发了许多MTR方法,但它们的性能如何受到数据集特征(如线性度、目标数量和相互关联复杂性)的影响仍然存在疑问。为了更好地理解数据集属性与MTR方法之间的关系,我们生成了33个具有受控特征的合成数据集,并使用单目标和6种MTR方法测试了它们的性能。结果表明,即使在目标不线性相关的数据集上,MTR方法也能提高预测性能,但根据数据集组成的不同,方法/回归量组合的预测提高程度有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking Multi-target Regression Methods
Machine learning methods for multi-target regression (MTR) rely on the hypothesis that an inter-target correlation can improve predictive performance. In the last years, many MTR methods were developed, but there are still questions about how their performances are influenced by the datasets characteristics such as linearity, number of targets, and inter-correlation complexity. Aiming at contributing to the understanding of the relationship between the dataset properties and MTR methods, we generated 33 synthetic datasets with controlled characteristics and tested their performance with single-target and six MTR methods. The results showed that MTR methods were able to improve performance even in datasets whose targets were not linearly correlated among them, but the predictive improvement differed among the combinations of method/regressor according to the dataset composition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Data Using Extended Association Rule Network SPt: A Text Mining Process to Extract Relevant Areas from SW Documents to Exploratory Tests Gene Essentiality Prediction Using Topological Features From Metabolic Networks Bio-Inspired and Heuristic Methods Applied to a Benchmark of the Task Scheduling Problem A New Genetic Algorithm-Based Pruning Approach for Optimum-Path Forest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1