贝叶斯对数秩检验

Jiaqi Gu, Y. Zhang, G. Yin
{"title":"贝叶斯对数秩检验","authors":"Jiaqi Gu, Y. Zhang, G. Yin","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2022.2161637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Comparison of two survival curves is a fundamental problem in survival analysis. Although abundant frequentist methods have been developed for comparing survival functions, inference procedures from the Bayesian perspective are rather limited. In this article, we extract the quantity of interest from the classic log-rank test and propose its Bayesian counterpart. Monte Carlo methods, including a Gibbs sampler and a sequential importance sampling procedure, are developed to draw posterior samples of survival functions and a decision rule of hypothesis testing is constructed for making inference. Via simulations and real data analysis, the proposed Bayesian log-rank test is shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the classic one when noninformative prior distributions are used, which provides a Bayesian interpretation of the log-rank test. When using the correct prior information from historical data, the Bayesian log-rank test is shown to outperform the classic one in terms of power. R codes to implement the Bayesian log-rank test are also provided with step-by-step instructions.","PeriodicalId":342642,"journal":{"name":"The American Statistician","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian Log-Rank Test\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqi Gu, Y. Zhang, G. Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00031305.2022.2161637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Comparison of two survival curves is a fundamental problem in survival analysis. Although abundant frequentist methods have been developed for comparing survival functions, inference procedures from the Bayesian perspective are rather limited. In this article, we extract the quantity of interest from the classic log-rank test and propose its Bayesian counterpart. Monte Carlo methods, including a Gibbs sampler and a sequential importance sampling procedure, are developed to draw posterior samples of survival functions and a decision rule of hypothesis testing is constructed for making inference. Via simulations and real data analysis, the proposed Bayesian log-rank test is shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the classic one when noninformative prior distributions are used, which provides a Bayesian interpretation of the log-rank test. When using the correct prior information from historical data, the Bayesian log-rank test is shown to outperform the classic one in terms of power. R codes to implement the Bayesian log-rank test are also provided with step-by-step instructions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Statistician\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Statistician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2022.2161637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2022.2161637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两种生存曲线的比较是生存分析中的一个基本问题。虽然已经开发了大量的频率论方法来比较生存函数,但从贝叶斯的角度进行推理的程序相当有限。在本文中,我们从经典的log-rank检验中提取感兴趣的数量,并提出它的贝叶斯对应物。提出了利用Gibbs采样器和顺序重要抽样法提取生存函数后验样本的蒙特卡罗方法,并构造了假设检验的决策规则进行推理。通过仿真和实际数据分析,表明当使用非信息先验分布时,所提出的贝叶斯对数秩检验与经典的贝叶斯对数秩检验是渐近等价的,从而提供了对数秩检验的贝叶斯解释。当使用来自历史数据的正确先验信息时,贝叶斯对数秩检验在功率方面优于经典检验。R代码实现贝叶斯对数秩测试也提供了一步一步的说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bayesian Log-Rank Test
Abstract Comparison of two survival curves is a fundamental problem in survival analysis. Although abundant frequentist methods have been developed for comparing survival functions, inference procedures from the Bayesian perspective are rather limited. In this article, we extract the quantity of interest from the classic log-rank test and propose its Bayesian counterpart. Monte Carlo methods, including a Gibbs sampler and a sequential importance sampling procedure, are developed to draw posterior samples of survival functions and a decision rule of hypothesis testing is constructed for making inference. Via simulations and real data analysis, the proposed Bayesian log-rank test is shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the classic one when noninformative prior distributions are used, which provides a Bayesian interpretation of the log-rank test. When using the correct prior information from historical data, the Bayesian log-rank test is shown to outperform the classic one in terms of power. R codes to implement the Bayesian log-rank test are also provided with step-by-step instructions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review of Design of Experiments courses offered to undergraduate students at American universities On Misuses of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for One-Sample Goodness-of-Fit Sequential Selection for Minimizing the Variance with Application to Crystallization Experiments Sequential Selection for Minimizing the Variance with Application to Crystallization Experiments Introduction to Stochastic Finance with Market Examples, 2nd ed Introduction to Stochastic Finance with Market Examples, 2nd ed . Nicolas Privault, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2023, x + 652 pp., $120.00(H), ISBN 978-1-032-28826-0.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1