左旋肉碱与辅酶Q10辅助治疗克罗米芬耐药多囊卵巢综合征提高妊娠率和预防早期妊娠丢失的比较研究

S. Ibrahim
{"title":"左旋肉碱与辅酶Q10辅助治疗克罗米芬耐药多囊卵巢综合征提高妊娠率和预防早期妊娠丢失的比较研究","authors":"S. Ibrahim","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2020.22384.1072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the work: Compare the effectiveness of L-carnitine versus Co-enzyme Q10 on improving pregnancy rates and decraese the rate of early pregnancy loss in patients with PCO resistant to clomiphene citrate.Setting and Design: A prospective randomized controlled study conducted in infertility clinic of a tertiary care center from June 2017 to June 2019.Patients and Methods: A total of 225 subjects presenting with infertility and diagnosed with PCOS (based on Rotterdam criteria 2003) and resistant to clomiphene citrate were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A: received clomiphene citrate (CC) only, Group B: received clomiphene citrate plus L-carnitine (2gm). Group C: received clomiphene citrate plus co- enzyme Q10 (200 mg). Main outcome measures include the ovulation rate, cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) are the primary outcome measures.Results: The ovulation rate was significantly higher among the groups B,C compared to group A (62.5%, 66.6% vs 18.3% respectively). Total number of cases who get pregnant were higher in Group B 35(47.3%), Group C 33(44.6%) compared to Group A 6(8.1%). Cumulative Clinical pregnancy rate was 3%, 49.3%, and 47.8% for Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively. The abortion rate was low in Group B 4 % and significantly lower in Group C 2.7% compared to Group A 6.7%.  Conclusion: Adding either L-carnitine or Co-enzyme Q10 to clomiphene citrate in patients with clomiphene-resistant PCOS were beneficial in increasing the quality of ovulation, the clinical pregnancy rate ،also in decreasing the rate of early pregnancy loss.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between L-carnitine versus co-enzyme Q10 as an adjuvant therapy to clomiphene resistant pcos women on improving pregnancy rate and prevention of early pregnancy loss\",\"authors\":\"S. Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ebwhj.2020.22384.1072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim of the work: Compare the effectiveness of L-carnitine versus Co-enzyme Q10 on improving pregnancy rates and decraese the rate of early pregnancy loss in patients with PCO resistant to clomiphene citrate.Setting and Design: A prospective randomized controlled study conducted in infertility clinic of a tertiary care center from June 2017 to June 2019.Patients and Methods: A total of 225 subjects presenting with infertility and diagnosed with PCOS (based on Rotterdam criteria 2003) and resistant to clomiphene citrate were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A: received clomiphene citrate (CC) only, Group B: received clomiphene citrate plus L-carnitine (2gm). Group C: received clomiphene citrate plus co- enzyme Q10 (200 mg). Main outcome measures include the ovulation rate, cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) are the primary outcome measures.Results: The ovulation rate was significantly higher among the groups B,C compared to group A (62.5%, 66.6% vs 18.3% respectively). Total number of cases who get pregnant were higher in Group B 35(47.3%), Group C 33(44.6%) compared to Group A 6(8.1%). Cumulative Clinical pregnancy rate was 3%, 49.3%, and 47.8% for Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively. The abortion rate was low in Group B 4 % and significantly lower in Group C 2.7% compared to Group A 6.7%.  Conclusion: Adding either L-carnitine or Co-enzyme Q10 to clomiphene citrate in patients with clomiphene-resistant PCOS were beneficial in increasing the quality of ovulation, the clinical pregnancy rate ،also in decreasing the rate of early pregnancy loss.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2020.22384.1072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2020.22384.1072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作目的:比较左旋肉碱与辅酶Q10对克罗米芬耐药PCO患者提高妊娠率和降低早期妊娠损失率的效果。设置与设计:于2017年6月至2019年6月在某三级保健中心不孕症门诊进行前瞻性随机对照研究。患者和方法:共有225名不孕症和诊断为多囊卵巢综合征(基于2003年鹿特丹标准)且对枸橼酸克罗米芬耐药的患者入组研究。受试者被随机分为三组。A组:仅给予枸橼酸克罗米芬(CC), B组:给予枸橼酸克罗米芬加左旋肉碱(2gm)。C组:给予枸橼酸克罗米芬加辅酶Q10 (200 mg)。主要观察指标包括排卵率,临床累计妊娠率(CPR)为主要观察指标。结果:B、C组的排卵率明显高于A组(分别为62.5%、66.6%和18.3%)。总怀孕例数B组35例(47.3%),C组33例(44.6%)高于A组6例(8.1%)。A、B、C组累计临床妊娠率分别为3%、49.3%、47.8%。流产率B组较低,为4%;C组较A组低,为2.7%;结论:克罗米芬耐药PCOS患者在枸橼酸克罗米芬中加入左旋肉碱或辅酶Q10均有利于提高排卵质量,临床妊娠率،also,降低早期妊娠丢失率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study between L-carnitine versus co-enzyme Q10 as an adjuvant therapy to clomiphene resistant pcos women on improving pregnancy rate and prevention of early pregnancy loss
Aim of the work: Compare the effectiveness of L-carnitine versus Co-enzyme Q10 on improving pregnancy rates and decraese the rate of early pregnancy loss in patients with PCO resistant to clomiphene citrate.Setting and Design: A prospective randomized controlled study conducted in infertility clinic of a tertiary care center from June 2017 to June 2019.Patients and Methods: A total of 225 subjects presenting with infertility and diagnosed with PCOS (based on Rotterdam criteria 2003) and resistant to clomiphene citrate were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A: received clomiphene citrate (CC) only, Group B: received clomiphene citrate plus L-carnitine (2gm). Group C: received clomiphene citrate plus co- enzyme Q10 (200 mg). Main outcome measures include the ovulation rate, cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) are the primary outcome measures.Results: The ovulation rate was significantly higher among the groups B,C compared to group A (62.5%, 66.6% vs 18.3% respectively). Total number of cases who get pregnant were higher in Group B 35(47.3%), Group C 33(44.6%) compared to Group A 6(8.1%). Cumulative Clinical pregnancy rate was 3%, 49.3%, and 47.8% for Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively. The abortion rate was low in Group B 4 % and significantly lower in Group C 2.7% compared to Group A 6.7%.  Conclusion: Adding either L-carnitine or Co-enzyme Q10 to clomiphene citrate in patients with clomiphene-resistant PCOS were beneficial in increasing the quality of ovulation, the clinical pregnancy rate ،also in decreasing the rate of early pregnancy loss.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, a prospective randomized controlled study Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia Cervical cerclage for Pregnant Women at High-risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth can act beyond its Mechanical Action New ultrasound signs for prediction of early placental Insufficiency Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss During and After Elective Lower‐Segment Cesarean Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1