{"title":"提升司法审查水平:英国行政法院区域化","authors":"Lee Marsons, Gabriel Tan","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2165776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"They provide a reasoned record of the outcome for parties to the dispute, they facilitate transparency around the exercise of judicial power, they inform potential litigants of how their potential claim might fare, they structure the operation of government, and … they provide an important part of an evidence base that allows the system of judicial review itself to be understood and evaluated. 41","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"313 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levelling Up Judicial Review: Regionalising the Administrative Court in England\",\"authors\":\"Lee Marsons, Gabriel Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2165776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"They provide a reasoned record of the outcome for parties to the dispute, they facilitate transparency around the exercise of judicial power, they inform potential litigants of how their potential claim might fare, they structure the operation of government, and … they provide an important part of an evidence base that allows the system of judicial review itself to be understood and evaluated. 41\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"313 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2165776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2165776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Levelling Up Judicial Review: Regionalising the Administrative Court in England
They provide a reasoned record of the outcome for parties to the dispute, they facilitate transparency around the exercise of judicial power, they inform potential litigants of how their potential claim might fare, they structure the operation of government, and … they provide an important part of an evidence base that allows the system of judicial review itself to be understood and evaluated. 41
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
