{"title":"有贸易成本和距离成本的多市场联系","authors":"Rimjhim Singh","doi":"10.48001/jbmis.2022.0901001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a critical comparison of the four major papers on territorial allocation by Bernheim and Whinston, Lommerud and Sorgard, Schroder, and Bhattacharjea and Sinha. The paper adds a new dimension to the analysis as it also studies the impact of a change in distance on collusion and establishes the distance paradox which states that collusion is facilitated with a unit fall in the distance","PeriodicalId":441226,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Management and Information Systems","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimarket contacts with trade costs and distance cost\",\"authors\":\"Rimjhim Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.48001/jbmis.2022.0901001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a critical comparison of the four major papers on territorial allocation by Bernheim and Whinston, Lommerud and Sorgard, Schroder, and Bhattacharjea and Sinha. The paper adds a new dimension to the analysis as it also studies the impact of a change in distance on collusion and establishes the distance paradox which states that collusion is facilitated with a unit fall in the distance\",\"PeriodicalId\":441226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Management and Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Management and Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48001/jbmis.2022.0901001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Management and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48001/jbmis.2022.0901001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对Bernheim and whinsta、Lommerud and Sorgard、Schroder、Bhattacharjea and Sinha四篇关于领土分配的主要论文进行了批判性比较。本文还研究了距离变化对共谋的影响,并建立了距离悖论,即单位落在距离上有利于共谋
Multimarket contacts with trade costs and distance cost
This paper presents a critical comparison of the four major papers on territorial allocation by Bernheim and Whinston, Lommerud and Sorgard, Schroder, and Bhattacharjea and Sinha. The paper adds a new dimension to the analysis as it also studies the impact of a change in distance on collusion and establishes the distance paradox which states that collusion is facilitated with a unit fall in the distance