“一个历史学家的日记”:自传,生活写作和尼尔·布卢维特的内阁日记重访

Joshua Black
{"title":"“一个历史学家的日记”:自传,生活写作和尼尔·布卢维特的内阁日记重访","authors":"Joshua Black","doi":"10.22459/ajbh.05.2021.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Are you, in fact, a historian?’ I have been confronted with that question more than once with respect to studies of political biography and memoir. Experts in fields ranging from English literature and memory studies to cultural studies have suggested to me, almost casually, that a sophisticated analysis of the political memoir or diary can only take place within the framework of autobiographical or memory theory.1 One cultural studies specialist proposed that these texts belonged within the remit of New Historicism, a branch of literary analysis that assumes that ‘literary texts can in fact tell us something about the world outside of the text’.2 In another instance, a conference attendee mused that this kind of research could not constitute the work of a historian, but was instead a facet of the broader field of life writing. The relationship between history and biography—including political biography— remains complex and contested, with the former both shunning and occasionally embracing the latter.3 Studies of the political memoir and diary genres are, I would suggest, even more fraught with intellectual uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":143131,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Biography and History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘A historian’s diary’: Autobiography, life writing and Neal Blewett’s A Cabinet Diary revisited\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Black\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/ajbh.05.2021.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘Are you, in fact, a historian?’ I have been confronted with that question more than once with respect to studies of political biography and memoir. Experts in fields ranging from English literature and memory studies to cultural studies have suggested to me, almost casually, that a sophisticated analysis of the political memoir or diary can only take place within the framework of autobiographical or memory theory.1 One cultural studies specialist proposed that these texts belonged within the remit of New Historicism, a branch of literary analysis that assumes that ‘literary texts can in fact tell us something about the world outside of the text’.2 In another instance, a conference attendee mused that this kind of research could not constitute the work of a historian, but was instead a facet of the broader field of life writing. The relationship between history and biography—including political biography— remains complex and contested, with the former both shunning and occasionally embracing the latter.3 Studies of the political memoir and diary genres are, I would suggest, even more fraught with intellectual uncertainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Biography and History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Biography and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/ajbh.05.2021.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Biography and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/ajbh.05.2021.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“你真的是个历史学家吗?”在研究政治传记和回忆录的过程中,我不止一次遇到过这个问题。从英国文学、记忆研究到文化研究等领域的专家们几乎是随便地向我建议,对政治回忆录或日记的复杂分析只能在自传或记忆理论的框架内进行一位文化研究专家提出,这些文本属于新历史主义的范畴,新历史主义是文学分析的一个分支,它假设“文学文本实际上可以告诉我们一些关于文本之外的世界的事情”在另一个例子中,一位与会者沉思着说,这种研究不能构成历史学家的工作,而是更广泛的生活写作领域的一个方面。历史与传记(包括政治传记)之间的关系仍然是复杂而有争议的,前者既回避后者,也偶尔拥抱后者我认为,对政治回忆录和日记类型的研究更充满了知识上的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘A historian’s diary’: Autobiography, life writing and Neal Blewett’s A Cabinet Diary revisited
‘Are you, in fact, a historian?’ I have been confronted with that question more than once with respect to studies of political biography and memoir. Experts in fields ranging from English literature and memory studies to cultural studies have suggested to me, almost casually, that a sophisticated analysis of the political memoir or diary can only take place within the framework of autobiographical or memory theory.1 One cultural studies specialist proposed that these texts belonged within the remit of New Historicism, a branch of literary analysis that assumes that ‘literary texts can in fact tell us something about the world outside of the text’.2 In another instance, a conference attendee mused that this kind of research could not constitute the work of a historian, but was instead a facet of the broader field of life writing. The relationship between history and biography—including political biography— remains complex and contested, with the former both shunning and occasionally embracing the latter.3 Studies of the political memoir and diary genres are, I would suggest, even more fraught with intellectual uncertainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patrick White and the path to Sarsaparilla: How a great novelist became a great unread Autobiography as publicity: The case of Jenny Howard Sport, race and African-Caribbean migrants in Australia: Evaluating Jack Dowridge, the ‘Black Diamond’ boxer Beyond the red shoe: Searching for Mrs Petrov Beyond the limits: Australian anti‑communism and the unforgiving 1950s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1