用JM Ramirez和jdeus评分评价阑尾切除术阴性的频率

Haider Kamran, Enas Nawaz Khan, S. Ghaffar, Uzma Shabbir, Muhammad Bilal Akbar, Valeeja Zafar
{"title":"用JM Ramirez和jdeus评分评价阑尾切除术阴性的频率","authors":"Haider Kamran, Enas Nawaz Khan, S. Ghaffar, Uzma Shabbir, Muhammad Bilal Akbar, Valeeja Zafar","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs22169959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute Appendicitis (AA) is the commonest surgical emergency encountered by surgeon in public & private setup in Pakistan. When it comes to diagnosis, patient seldom presents with the typical bookish picture (symptoms / signs) of the condition. Diagnosis therefore remains an enigma many a times especially for house officers and residents during their emergency duty. Various scores had been developed to aid the diagnosis, Alvarado score although gained popularity and is practiced in our setup. This study was designed to evaluate one such score designed by JM Ramirez & J Deus, for its negative appendicectomy rate calculation with the view to adopt it to our routine practice if it turns out with lesser negative appendicectomy rate compared to other scores in practice. Methods: This descriptive study was designed & carried out at the Surgical “B” Unit of Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad from November 01, 2020 to June 30, 2021. A total of 190 patients with suspected AA were included, assessed by the score and accordingly placed in three groups based upon their initial score. Group-I patients were discharged with the advice to come back to same unit / hospital if pain persists or recurs. Group-II patients were kept in observation for 24 hours and finally re-categorized either as Group-I or Group-III based upon a drop or rise in their score. Group-III patients were operated after preparation. Data collected over a special proforma was finalized at the time of discharge of patient, earlier in case of group I patients or after getting histopathology report in case of Group-III patients that was later analyzed with the help of SPSS-version 26. Results: Out of 190 patients included in study 129 were male while 61 were female patients. 49 patients presented with a score less than –15 (Group–I) & were discharged after evaluation. 53 patients had a score between –15 to 09 (Group–II), were therefore kept under observation till next 24-48 hour. Score of 30 dropped to Group-I range & were similarly discharged like Group-I patients. Score of 23 patients rose up to 10 or above (i.e. Group-III range) & were therefore operated like other 88 patients belonging to Group-III. 91 patients were having acutely inflammed, phlegmonous, gangrenous, perforated appendix or appendix with impacted faecolith / pus in the lumen, their appendicectomy specimen along with the specimen of 20 other difficult to diagnose cases on gross vision were sent for histopathology. H/P report confirmed 100 as positive & 11 as negative for appendicitis. 111 patients totally got operated, out of which 11 turned out negative appendicectomies. Frequency of negative appendicectomies overall was therefore 09.9%. It was 05.56% in male (i.e. 04/72) and 17.94 % (i.e. 07/39) in female patients. Conclusion: Score developed by JM Ramirez and J Deus proved quite helpful in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis & reduction of the frequency of Negative appendicectomies. Being simple, non-invasive & cost-effective, requiring no special equipment or investigations for its application, it ensures an instant, structured & thorough assessment of patient. The score is therefore recommended for its routine adoption / application in our setup in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis to reduce the frequency of negative appendicectomies. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, frequency of negative appendicectomy, scoring system, Ayub Teaching Hospital","PeriodicalId":296492,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of Negative Appendicectomy after Evaluation by JM Ramirez & J Deus Score\",\"authors\":\"Haider Kamran, Enas Nawaz Khan, S. Ghaffar, Uzma Shabbir, Muhammad Bilal Akbar, Valeeja Zafar\",\"doi\":\"10.53350/pjmhs22169959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Acute Appendicitis (AA) is the commonest surgical emergency encountered by surgeon in public & private setup in Pakistan. When it comes to diagnosis, patient seldom presents with the typical bookish picture (symptoms / signs) of the condition. Diagnosis therefore remains an enigma many a times especially for house officers and residents during their emergency duty. Various scores had been developed to aid the diagnosis, Alvarado score although gained popularity and is practiced in our setup. This study was designed to evaluate one such score designed by JM Ramirez & J Deus, for its negative appendicectomy rate calculation with the view to adopt it to our routine practice if it turns out with lesser negative appendicectomy rate compared to other scores in practice. Methods: This descriptive study was designed & carried out at the Surgical “B” Unit of Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad from November 01, 2020 to June 30, 2021. A total of 190 patients with suspected AA were included, assessed by the score and accordingly placed in three groups based upon their initial score. Group-I patients were discharged with the advice to come back to same unit / hospital if pain persists or recurs. Group-II patients were kept in observation for 24 hours and finally re-categorized either as Group-I or Group-III based upon a drop or rise in their score. Group-III patients were operated after preparation. Data collected over a special proforma was finalized at the time of discharge of patient, earlier in case of group I patients or after getting histopathology report in case of Group-III patients that was later analyzed with the help of SPSS-version 26. Results: Out of 190 patients included in study 129 were male while 61 were female patients. 49 patients presented with a score less than –15 (Group–I) & were discharged after evaluation. 53 patients had a score between –15 to 09 (Group–II), were therefore kept under observation till next 24-48 hour. Score of 30 dropped to Group-I range & were similarly discharged like Group-I patients. Score of 23 patients rose up to 10 or above (i.e. Group-III range) & were therefore operated like other 88 patients belonging to Group-III. 91 patients were having acutely inflammed, phlegmonous, gangrenous, perforated appendix or appendix with impacted faecolith / pus in the lumen, their appendicectomy specimen along with the specimen of 20 other difficult to diagnose cases on gross vision were sent for histopathology. H/P report confirmed 100 as positive & 11 as negative for appendicitis. 111 patients totally got operated, out of which 11 turned out negative appendicectomies. Frequency of negative appendicectomies overall was therefore 09.9%. It was 05.56% in male (i.e. 04/72) and 17.94 % (i.e. 07/39) in female patients. Conclusion: Score developed by JM Ramirez and J Deus proved quite helpful in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis & reduction of the frequency of Negative appendicectomies. Being simple, non-invasive & cost-effective, requiring no special equipment or investigations for its application, it ensures an instant, structured & thorough assessment of patient. The score is therefore recommended for its routine adoption / application in our setup in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis to reduce the frequency of negative appendicectomies. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, frequency of negative appendicectomy, scoring system, Ayub Teaching Hospital\",\"PeriodicalId\":296492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22169959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22169959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性阑尾炎(AA)是巴基斯坦公立和私立机构的外科医生遇到的最常见的外科急诊。在诊断时,患者很少表现出典型的书本症状(症状/体征)。因此,诊断仍然是一个谜很多次,特别是对房屋官员和居民在他们的紧急职责。已经开发了各种评分来帮助诊断,阿尔瓦拉多评分虽然得到了普及,并在我们的设置实践。本研究旨在对JM Ramirez & J Deus设计的一种阑尾切除阴性率的评分进行评价,如果在实践中阑尾切除阴性率低于其他评分,则将其应用于我们的日常实践。方法:本描述性研究于2020年11月1日至2021年6月30日在阿伯塔巴德Ayub教学医院B外科设计并实施。共纳入190例疑似AA患者,根据评分进行评估,并根据初始评分分为三组。第一组患者出院时,如果疼痛持续或复发,建议他们回到同一单位/医院。ii组患者观察24小时,最后根据评分的高低重新分类为i组或iii组。iii组患者在制备后进行手术。通过特殊形式收集的数据在患者出院时完成,I组患者在出院前完成,iii组患者在获得组织病理学报告后完成,随后使用SPSS-version 26进行分析。结果:纳入研究的190例患者中男性129例,女性61例。49例患者评分低于-15分(i组),经评估出院。53例患者评分在-15至09分之间(ii组),因此要继续观察到接下来的24-48小时。30分降至i组,出院与i组相似。23例患者评分达到10分及以上(即iii组范围),与其他88例患者同属iii组。91例急性炎、痰、坏疽、阑尾穿孔或阑尾腔内阻生粪/脓液,将其阑尾切除标本与另外20例肉眼难以诊断的病例标本送组织病理学检查。超声心动图证实100例阑尾炎阳性,11例阑尾炎阴性。全部手术111例,其中阑尾切除阴性11例。因此阑尾切除术阴性的总体发生率为09.9%。男性为05.56%(即04/72),女性为17.94%(即07/39)。结论:JM Ramirez和J Deus建立的评分对急性阑尾炎的诊断和减少阴性阑尾切除术的频率有很大的帮助。简单,非侵入性和成本效益,不需要特殊设备或调查其应用,它确保了即时,结构化和彻底的患者评估。因此,我们建议在急性阑尾炎的诊断中常规采用/应用该评分,以减少阑尾切除术阴性的频率。关键词:急性阑尾炎,阴性阑尾切除术频率,评分系统,Ayub教学医院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frequency of Negative Appendicectomy after Evaluation by JM Ramirez & J Deus Score
Background: Acute Appendicitis (AA) is the commonest surgical emergency encountered by surgeon in public & private setup in Pakistan. When it comes to diagnosis, patient seldom presents with the typical bookish picture (symptoms / signs) of the condition. Diagnosis therefore remains an enigma many a times especially for house officers and residents during their emergency duty. Various scores had been developed to aid the diagnosis, Alvarado score although gained popularity and is practiced in our setup. This study was designed to evaluate one such score designed by JM Ramirez & J Deus, for its negative appendicectomy rate calculation with the view to adopt it to our routine practice if it turns out with lesser negative appendicectomy rate compared to other scores in practice. Methods: This descriptive study was designed & carried out at the Surgical “B” Unit of Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad from November 01, 2020 to June 30, 2021. A total of 190 patients with suspected AA were included, assessed by the score and accordingly placed in three groups based upon their initial score. Group-I patients were discharged with the advice to come back to same unit / hospital if pain persists or recurs. Group-II patients were kept in observation for 24 hours and finally re-categorized either as Group-I or Group-III based upon a drop or rise in their score. Group-III patients were operated after preparation. Data collected over a special proforma was finalized at the time of discharge of patient, earlier in case of group I patients or after getting histopathology report in case of Group-III patients that was later analyzed with the help of SPSS-version 26. Results: Out of 190 patients included in study 129 were male while 61 were female patients. 49 patients presented with a score less than –15 (Group–I) & were discharged after evaluation. 53 patients had a score between –15 to 09 (Group–II), were therefore kept under observation till next 24-48 hour. Score of 30 dropped to Group-I range & were similarly discharged like Group-I patients. Score of 23 patients rose up to 10 or above (i.e. Group-III range) & were therefore operated like other 88 patients belonging to Group-III. 91 patients were having acutely inflammed, phlegmonous, gangrenous, perforated appendix or appendix with impacted faecolith / pus in the lumen, their appendicectomy specimen along with the specimen of 20 other difficult to diagnose cases on gross vision were sent for histopathology. H/P report confirmed 100 as positive & 11 as negative for appendicitis. 111 patients totally got operated, out of which 11 turned out negative appendicectomies. Frequency of negative appendicectomies overall was therefore 09.9%. It was 05.56% in male (i.e. 04/72) and 17.94 % (i.e. 07/39) in female patients. Conclusion: Score developed by JM Ramirez and J Deus proved quite helpful in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis & reduction of the frequency of Negative appendicectomies. Being simple, non-invasive & cost-effective, requiring no special equipment or investigations for its application, it ensures an instant, structured & thorough assessment of patient. The score is therefore recommended for its routine adoption / application in our setup in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis to reduce the frequency of negative appendicectomies. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, frequency of negative appendicectomy, scoring system, Ayub Teaching Hospital
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Audit of Injuries Sustained in Two–Wheeler Accidents in the Metropolitan City of Karachi, Pakistan Real World Data about the Characteristics of Adult Diabetes Mellitus Patients Visiting Outpatient Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy of Oral Midazolam in Post Operative Pain Reduction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Effect of Low Dose (100mg/kg) of Zinc Telluride (ZnTe) on Hematology of Male Albino Mice (Mus musculus) Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Typhidot Test Against Blood Culture in Diagnosis of Enteric Fever
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1