{"title":"规格中的默认值","authors":"M. Ryan","doi":"10.1109/ISRE.1993.324823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A formalism is motivated and described for representing defaults in specifications. The formalism is called ordered theory presentations. The ability to represent defaults narrows the gap between a customer's initial requirements and a formal specification, and supports reuse on both a small and a large scale. Issues are illustrated throughout reference to the lift example. The application of the formalism to specification revision is considered.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":375368,"journal":{"name":"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defaults in specifications\",\"authors\":\"M. Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISRE.1993.324823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A formalism is motivated and described for representing defaults in specifications. The formalism is called ordered theory presentations. The ability to represent defaults narrows the gap between a customer's initial requirements and a formal specification, and supports reuse on both a small and a large scale. Issues are illustrated throughout reference to the lift example. The application of the formalism to specification revision is considered.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":375368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1993.324823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1993.324823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A formalism is motivated and described for representing defaults in specifications. The formalism is called ordered theory presentations. The ability to represent defaults narrows the gap between a customer's initial requirements and a formal specification, and supports reuse on both a small and a large scale. Issues are illustrated throughout reference to the lift example. The application of the formalism to specification revision is considered.<>
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
![[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering](/Content/css/sci/img/zetp.jpg)
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
