19世纪欧洲歌剧经典的创作

C. Charle
{"title":"19世纪欧洲歌剧经典的创作","authors":"C. Charle","doi":"10.4000/bssg.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The numerous monographs centred on the evolution of the repertoires of nineteenth–and twentieth–century opera houses make possible a statistical measure of the increasing ageing process of the most frequently performed operas. The canonisation of early successes takes place mainly from the second half of the 19th century onwards and becomes more pronounced in the 20th century. This refusal of novelty is due to the rising costs of performance, to the emergence of a pantheon of composers that has been little renewed over the generations, and to the growing influence of show organisers, singing stars and theatre directors. The dissemination of the most famous arias, which made certain composers particularly popular, notably in Italy (Verdi), France (Gounod, Bizet), Germany (Wagner), and later in Russia and Central Europe, also encouraged the repeated performances, for the widest possible audiences at festivals or in the media, of works gradually selected by posterity. This process is reminiscent of the emergence of the great masters of classical music or painting before the advent of modernity, but it has its own specific features due to the weight of a show mobilising several arts (theatre, set, costume, music, dance) and the early internationalisation of the most frequently performed works. A few reference scenes serve as test beds for the future canonisation process, which is rarely called into question, as can be the case for other arts that are less dependent on the major European cultural capitals’ institutions. However, this canon is never definitively stabilised: discontinuation may still happen, particularly when the conditions of production make it impossible to revive works that were once central. This marginal renewal implies a very strong selectivity for new works and significantly slows down the recognition of the most innovative ones.","PeriodicalId":300699,"journal":{"name":"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods","volume":"382 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Creation of an Operatic Canon in Nineteenth-Century Europe\",\"authors\":\"C. Charle\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/bssg.655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The numerous monographs centred on the evolution of the repertoires of nineteenth–and twentieth–century opera houses make possible a statistical measure of the increasing ageing process of the most frequently performed operas. The canonisation of early successes takes place mainly from the second half of the 19th century onwards and becomes more pronounced in the 20th century. This refusal of novelty is due to the rising costs of performance, to the emergence of a pantheon of composers that has been little renewed over the generations, and to the growing influence of show organisers, singing stars and theatre directors. The dissemination of the most famous arias, which made certain composers particularly popular, notably in Italy (Verdi), France (Gounod, Bizet), Germany (Wagner), and later in Russia and Central Europe, also encouraged the repeated performances, for the widest possible audiences at festivals or in the media, of works gradually selected by posterity. This process is reminiscent of the emergence of the great masters of classical music or painting before the advent of modernity, but it has its own specific features due to the weight of a show mobilising several arts (theatre, set, costume, music, dance) and the early internationalisation of the most frequently performed works. A few reference scenes serve as test beds for the future canonisation process, which is rarely called into question, as can be the case for other arts that are less dependent on the major European cultural capitals’ institutions. However, this canon is never definitively stabilised: discontinuation may still happen, particularly when the conditions of production make it impossible to revive works that were once central. This marginal renewal implies a very strong selectivity for new works and significantly slows down the recognition of the most innovative ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods\",\"volume\":\"382 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/bssg.655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/bssg.655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量的专著集中于19世纪和20世纪歌剧院剧目的演变,这使得对最常演出的歌剧日益老化的过程进行统计测量成为可能。早期成功的封圣主要发生在19世纪下半叶以后,在20世纪变得更加明显。这种对新奇事物的拒绝是由于演出成本的不断上升,由于几代人以来几乎没有更新的作曲家的万神殿的出现,以及演出组织者、歌星和剧院导演日益增长的影响力。最著名的咏叹调的传播,使某些作曲家特别受欢迎,特别是在意大利(威尔第),法国(古诺,比才),德国(瓦格纳),后来在俄罗斯和中欧,也鼓励了反复演出,在节日或媒体上尽可能广泛的观众,由后人逐渐选择的作品。这一过程让人想起现代到来之前古典音乐或绘画大师的出现,但由于一场演出调动了多种艺术(戏剧、布景、服装、音乐、舞蹈)的重要性,以及最常演出的作品的早期国际化,它有自己的特点。一些参考场景作为未来册封过程的试验台,这很少受到质疑,就像其他不太依赖欧洲主要文化首都机构的艺术一样。然而,这一经典从未得到明确的稳定:停产仍有可能发生,特别是当生产条件使曾经的核心作品无法恢复时。这种边缘更新意味着对新作品有很强的选择性,并显著减缓了对最具创新性作品的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Creation of an Operatic Canon in Nineteenth-Century Europe
The numerous monographs centred on the evolution of the repertoires of nineteenth–and twentieth–century opera houses make possible a statistical measure of the increasing ageing process of the most frequently performed operas. The canonisation of early successes takes place mainly from the second half of the 19th century onwards and becomes more pronounced in the 20th century. This refusal of novelty is due to the rising costs of performance, to the emergence of a pantheon of composers that has been little renewed over the generations, and to the growing influence of show organisers, singing stars and theatre directors. The dissemination of the most famous arias, which made certain composers particularly popular, notably in Italy (Verdi), France (Gounod, Bizet), Germany (Wagner), and later in Russia and Central Europe, also encouraged the repeated performances, for the widest possible audiences at festivals or in the media, of works gradually selected by posterity. This process is reminiscent of the emergence of the great masters of classical music or painting before the advent of modernity, but it has its own specific features due to the weight of a show mobilising several arts (theatre, set, costume, music, dance) and the early internationalisation of the most frequently performed works. A few reference scenes serve as test beds for the future canonisation process, which is rarely called into question, as can be the case for other arts that are less dependent on the major European cultural capitals’ institutions. However, this canon is never definitively stabilised: discontinuation may still happen, particularly when the conditions of production make it impossible to revive works that were once central. This marginal renewal implies a very strong selectivity for new works and significantly slows down the recognition of the most innovative ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Talks in the Bookshop: A Social Science Cultural Programme on the Margins of the University From Campaigns to Improve the Moral Standards of Children’s Books to their Literary Consecration: The Emergence of an International Sub-Field Comedic Tastes as Social Relations of Class: The Example of Youth from Cultured Class Fractions Avant-gardes and Postmodernism: The Reception of Peter Bürger’s Theory of the Avant-Garde in American Art Criticism “12,000 euros is not a lot to pay for a dream”: The Structured “Heteronomization” of Assessment in a Theatre Grants Committee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1