{"title":"欧洲史学传统中时空结构概念的演变","authors":"V. Chekanov","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-108-7/185-204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The historical science of modern times functions over 80 years already in the shade of French “Ècole des Annales”. Since 1929 it was considered an avant-garde of the most progressive trends in it, and never lost this status. This school is highly appreciated and regarded not only for its groundbreaking penetration into the research fields previously neglected by historians but also for its creation of generalizing conceptions of the past helping mankind to orientate itself in the space and time of the past 1 . The philosophical approach of the school wasn’t anything totally unpredictable but mainly continuing and developing the way of research outlined by Dutch historian Johann Huizinga in his work “The Autumn of the Middle Ages” (1919) 2 . From the very start it was threw in the field of cultural history and historiosophy never tied with historical science so tightly as from that time. In the period before history dared seldom to speak so freely about common trends of European civilization. Previously patriotically motivated and only partly belonging to the human race on whole, the historical science gradually moves since then up to the phase where just general history (“world history”) exists. The starting point was the ambitious attempt to prove the truly scientific character of history in the times when positivistic approach dominated and natural sciences were appreciated the highest. They provided the most important advancements during the period of arms race, and, of course, there was no idea that new ways of mankind’s self-identification towards the past would ever be of the same meaning. However the things have changed dramatically after the world wars’ period was over in the mid XX century. Since that time the significance of","PeriodicalId":426343,"journal":{"name":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN HISTORICAL SCIENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE","volume":"337 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF SPACE AND TIME STRUCTURES’ REFLECTION IN THE EUROPEAN TRADITION OF HISTORIOGRAPHY\",\"authors\":\"V. Chekanov\",\"doi\":\"10.36059/978-966-397-108-7/185-204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION The historical science of modern times functions over 80 years already in the shade of French “Ècole des Annales”. Since 1929 it was considered an avant-garde of the most progressive trends in it, and never lost this status. This school is highly appreciated and regarded not only for its groundbreaking penetration into the research fields previously neglected by historians but also for its creation of generalizing conceptions of the past helping mankind to orientate itself in the space and time of the past 1 . The philosophical approach of the school wasn’t anything totally unpredictable but mainly continuing and developing the way of research outlined by Dutch historian Johann Huizinga in his work “The Autumn of the Middle Ages” (1919) 2 . From the very start it was threw in the field of cultural history and historiosophy never tied with historical science so tightly as from that time. In the period before history dared seldom to speak so freely about common trends of European civilization. Previously patriotically motivated and only partly belonging to the human race on whole, the historical science gradually moves since then up to the phase where just general history (“world history”) exists. The starting point was the ambitious attempt to prove the truly scientific character of history in the times when positivistic approach dominated and natural sciences were appreciated the highest. They provided the most important advancements during the period of arms race, and, of course, there was no idea that new ways of mankind’s self-identification towards the past would ever be of the same meaning. However the things have changed dramatically after the world wars’ period was over in the mid XX century. Since that time the significance of\",\"PeriodicalId\":426343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN HISTORICAL SCIENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE\",\"volume\":\"337 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN HISTORICAL SCIENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-108-7/185-204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN HISTORICAL SCIENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-108-7/185-204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
近代历史科学已经在法国“Ècole des Annales”的阴影下运行了80多年。自1929年以来,它被认为是其中最进步的趋势的先锋,并且从未失去这种地位。这一学派之所以受到高度赞赏和重视,不仅是因为它开创性地进入了历史学家以前所忽视的研究领域,而且还因为它创造了概括过去的概念,帮助人类在过去的空间和时间中定位自己。该学派的哲学方法并不是完全不可预测的,而是主要延续和发展了荷兰历史学家约翰·赫伊津加在他的著作《中世纪的秋天》(1919)中概述的研究方法。从一开始,它就被投入到文化史领域,历史哲学从没有像那时那样与历史科学紧密地联系在一起。在此之前,历史很少敢如此自由地谈论欧洲文明的共同趋势。历史科学以前是出于爱国主义的动机,只是部分地属于整个人类,从那时起,历史科学逐渐发展到只有通史(“世界史”)存在的阶段。出发点是在实证主义方法占主导地位、自然科学受到最高赞赏的时代,雄心勃勃地试图证明历史的真正科学性质。它们在军备竞赛时期提供了最重要的进步,当然,没有人知道人类对过去的自我认同的新方式会有同样的意义。然而,在20世纪中期世界大战结束后,情况发生了巨大变化。自那时起的意义
EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF SPACE AND TIME STRUCTURES’ REFLECTION IN THE EUROPEAN TRADITION OF HISTORIOGRAPHY
INTRODUCTION The historical science of modern times functions over 80 years already in the shade of French “Ècole des Annales”. Since 1929 it was considered an avant-garde of the most progressive trends in it, and never lost this status. This school is highly appreciated and regarded not only for its groundbreaking penetration into the research fields previously neglected by historians but also for its creation of generalizing conceptions of the past helping mankind to orientate itself in the space and time of the past 1 . The philosophical approach of the school wasn’t anything totally unpredictable but mainly continuing and developing the way of research outlined by Dutch historian Johann Huizinga in his work “The Autumn of the Middle Ages” (1919) 2 . From the very start it was threw in the field of cultural history and historiosophy never tied with historical science so tightly as from that time. In the period before history dared seldom to speak so freely about common trends of European civilization. Previously patriotically motivated and only partly belonging to the human race on whole, the historical science gradually moves since then up to the phase where just general history (“world history”) exists. The starting point was the ambitious attempt to prove the truly scientific character of history in the times when positivistic approach dominated and natural sciences were appreciated the highest. They provided the most important advancements during the period of arms race, and, of course, there was no idea that new ways of mankind’s self-identification towards the past would ever be of the same meaning. However the things have changed dramatically after the world wars’ period was over in the mid XX century. Since that time the significance of