医学影像中健康信息技术相关事件的识别与分类——改进实践的基础

M. S. Jabin, F. Magrabi, P. Hibbert, T. Schultz, W. Runciman
{"title":"医学影像中健康信息技术相关事件的识别与分类——改进实践的基础","authors":"M. S. Jabin, F. Magrabi, P. Hibbert, T. Schultz, W. Runciman","doi":"10.1109/IST48021.2019.9010109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Joint Commission in the United States disseminated a Sentinel Event Alert because of the number of adverse outcomes from problems with health information technology (HIT). The HITs were trading off safety and quality against throughput or efficiency. The Alert urged healthcare providers to improve process measurement and provide leadership in mitigating the risks. In order to understand what problems compromise safety and efficiency, this study has accessed, deconstructed, categorized and analyzed Australian patient safety incident reports of the things that go wrong in medical imaging, and their impact on both patients and the medical imaging acquisition and processing systems. Data Sources comprised two sets of voluntary incident reports and convenience samples of interviews with radiology staff. A special targeted search was undertaken for identifying HIT related incidents so that they could be deconstructed with the health information technology classification system. This resulted in 436 HIT related incidents. Within these incidents, 623 HIT related issues were found. These included use or human factor related issues (40%), software and hardware related issues (30%) and machine related issues (30%). Although many technical problems and deficiencies were detected in the reports identified, we did not anticipate that more than half of the incidents would have involved failures of human performance. Identifying and characterizing the things that are going wrong, related to HIT through the lens of medical imaging incident reports can provide a basis for preventing issues and improving clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":117219,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying and Classifying Incidents Related to Health Information Technology in Medical Imaging as a Basis for Improvements in Practice\",\"authors\":\"M. S. Jabin, F. Magrabi, P. Hibbert, T. Schultz, W. Runciman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IST48021.2019.9010109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Joint Commission in the United States disseminated a Sentinel Event Alert because of the number of adverse outcomes from problems with health information technology (HIT). The HITs were trading off safety and quality against throughput or efficiency. The Alert urged healthcare providers to improve process measurement and provide leadership in mitigating the risks. In order to understand what problems compromise safety and efficiency, this study has accessed, deconstructed, categorized and analyzed Australian patient safety incident reports of the things that go wrong in medical imaging, and their impact on both patients and the medical imaging acquisition and processing systems. Data Sources comprised two sets of voluntary incident reports and convenience samples of interviews with radiology staff. A special targeted search was undertaken for identifying HIT related incidents so that they could be deconstructed with the health information technology classification system. This resulted in 436 HIT related incidents. Within these incidents, 623 HIT related issues were found. These included use or human factor related issues (40%), software and hardware related issues (30%) and machine related issues (30%). Although many technical problems and deficiencies were detected in the reports identified, we did not anticipate that more than half of the incidents would have involved failures of human performance. Identifying and characterizing the things that are going wrong, related to HIT through the lens of medical imaging incident reports can provide a basis for preventing issues and improving clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IST48021.2019.9010109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IST48021.2019.9010109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

美国联合委员会分发了一份前哨事件警报,因为卫生信息技术问题造成了许多不良后果。hit在安全性和质量与吞吐量或效率之间进行权衡。警报敦促医疗保健提供者改进过程测量,并在降低风险方面发挥领导作用。为了了解危害安全和效率的问题是什么,本研究访问、解构、分类和分析了澳大利亚医疗成像中出错的患者安全事件报告,以及它们对患者和医疗成像采集和处理系统的影响。数据来源包括两套自愿事件报告和与放射科工作人员面谈的方便样本。进行了一项特别的有针对性的搜索,以确定与卫生信息技术有关的事件,以便它们可以用卫生信息技术分类系统进行解构。这导致了436起HIT相关事件。在这些事件中,发现了623个与HIT相关的问题。这些问题包括使用或人为因素相关问题(40%),软件和硬件相关问题(30%)和机器相关问题(30%)。虽然在报告中发现了许多技术问题和缺陷,但我们没有预料到超过一半的事故涉及人为操作的失败。通过医学影像事件报告的视角来识别和描述与HIT相关的问题,可以为预防问题和改善临床实践提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying and Classifying Incidents Related to Health Information Technology in Medical Imaging as a Basis for Improvements in Practice
The Joint Commission in the United States disseminated a Sentinel Event Alert because of the number of adverse outcomes from problems with health information technology (HIT). The HITs were trading off safety and quality against throughput or efficiency. The Alert urged healthcare providers to improve process measurement and provide leadership in mitigating the risks. In order to understand what problems compromise safety and efficiency, this study has accessed, deconstructed, categorized and analyzed Australian patient safety incident reports of the things that go wrong in medical imaging, and their impact on both patients and the medical imaging acquisition and processing systems. Data Sources comprised two sets of voluntary incident reports and convenience samples of interviews with radiology staff. A special targeted search was undertaken for identifying HIT related incidents so that they could be deconstructed with the health information technology classification system. This resulted in 436 HIT related incidents. Within these incidents, 623 HIT related issues were found. These included use or human factor related issues (40%), software and hardware related issues (30%) and machine related issues (30%). Although many technical problems and deficiencies were detected in the reports identified, we did not anticipate that more than half of the incidents would have involved failures of human performance. Identifying and characterizing the things that are going wrong, related to HIT through the lens of medical imaging incident reports can provide a basis for preventing issues and improving clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning Adversarially Enhanced Heatmaps for Aorta Segmentation in CTA Millimeter Wave Imaging of Surface Defects and Corrosion under Paint using V-band Reflectometer An Efficient Human Activity Recognition Framework Based on Wearable IMU Wrist Sensors Retinal Layers OCT Scans 3-D Segmentation Identifying Asthma genetic signature patterns by mining Gene Expression BIG Datasets using Image Filtering Algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1