{"title":"中国法律对信用信息主体权益法律保护的案例研究与探索","authors":"Chen Jiandong, Jiang Zhengxiong, Wang Deling","doi":"10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit investigation report is an important social name card for individuals, enterprises and other information subjects. All kinds of wrong information in the credit investigation report will cause negative evaluation and actual losses to the information subject. Through the relevant cases analyzed by the people's court, the rights and interests protection of the subject of credit information involves the subject of credit information as a civil subject, the agency of credit information and the provider of credit information including civil and administrative subjects. It is still unclear how does the information subjects choose civil and administrative proceedings to safeguard their rights and interests. This is not only due to the imperfect legal provisions on the protection of credit information subjects in China, but also due to the uncertain boundary between the government's disclosure of personal information and personal privacy. For this, the author suggested to improve the legislation to Enhance the Responsibility of Regulatory Authorities to Protect the Rights and Interests of Information Subjects, set up the individual credit dispute arbitration mechanism host by the credit supervision authority, and participated by the information subject, credit agency, credit center or the information provider, processing the credit objections through the form of administrative arbitration.","PeriodicalId":375311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Study and Exploration for Legal Protection of the Rights and Interests of Credit Information Subjects Under Chinese Law\",\"authors\":\"Chen Jiandong, Jiang Zhengxiong, Wang Deling\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Credit investigation report is an important social name card for individuals, enterprises and other information subjects. All kinds of wrong information in the credit investigation report will cause negative evaluation and actual losses to the information subject. Through the relevant cases analyzed by the people's court, the rights and interests protection of the subject of credit information involves the subject of credit information as a civil subject, the agency of credit information and the provider of credit information including civil and administrative subjects. It is still unclear how does the information subjects choose civil and administrative proceedings to safeguard their rights and interests. This is not only due to the imperfect legal provisions on the protection of credit information subjects in China, but also due to the uncertain boundary between the government's disclosure of personal information and personal privacy. For this, the author suggested to improve the legislation to Enhance the Responsibility of Regulatory Authorities to Protect the Rights and Interests of Information Subjects, set up the individual credit dispute arbitration mechanism host by the credit supervision authority, and participated by the information subject, credit agency, credit center or the information provider, processing the credit objections through the form of administrative arbitration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Case Study and Exploration for Legal Protection of the Rights and Interests of Credit Information Subjects Under Chinese Law
Credit investigation report is an important social name card for individuals, enterprises and other information subjects. All kinds of wrong information in the credit investigation report will cause negative evaluation and actual losses to the information subject. Through the relevant cases analyzed by the people's court, the rights and interests protection of the subject of credit information involves the subject of credit information as a civil subject, the agency of credit information and the provider of credit information including civil and administrative subjects. It is still unclear how does the information subjects choose civil and administrative proceedings to safeguard their rights and interests. This is not only due to the imperfect legal provisions on the protection of credit information subjects in China, but also due to the uncertain boundary between the government's disclosure of personal information and personal privacy. For this, the author suggested to improve the legislation to Enhance the Responsibility of Regulatory Authorities to Protect the Rights and Interests of Information Subjects, set up the individual credit dispute arbitration mechanism host by the credit supervision authority, and participated by the information subject, credit agency, credit center or the information provider, processing the credit objections through the form of administrative arbitration.